• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Peer-to-Peer Sharing of Social Media Messages on Sexual Health in a School-Based Intervention: Opportunities and Challenges Identified in the STASH Feasibility Trial.基于学校的性健康干预中社交媒体信息的点对点分享:STASH可行性试验中发现的机遇与挑战
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 16;23(2):e20898. doi: 10.2196/20898.
2
3
A peer-led, school-based social network intervention for young people in the UK, promoting sexual health via social media and conversations with friends: intervention development and optimisation of STASH.一种基于同伴引导、以学校为基础的社交网络干预措施,通过社交媒体和与朋友的对话在英国年轻人中促进性健康:STASH 干预措施的制定和优化。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 11;23(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15541-x.
4
Peer-led intervention to prevent and reduce STI transmission and improve sexual health in secondary schools (STASH): protocol for a feasibility study.同伴主导的干预措施以预防和减少性传播感染在中学的传播并改善性健康(STASH):一项可行性研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Nov 29;4:180. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0354-9. eCollection 2018.
5
Feasibility study of peer-led and school-based social network Intervention (STASH) to promote adolescent sexual health.由同伴主导的校内社交网络干预措施(STASH)促进青少年性健康的可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jun 14;7(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00835-x.
6
Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention.社会网络研究对同伴主导和基于学校的性健康干预可行性研究中评估过程的贡献。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 10;11(1):12244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90852-w.
7
The Positive Choices trial: study protocol for a Phase-III RCT trial of a whole-school social marketing intervention to promote sexual health and reduce health inequalities.《积极选择试验》:一项针对全校范围社会营销干预措施的 III 期 RCT 试验的研究方案,旨在促进性健康和减少健康不平等。
Trials. 2021 Nov 17;22(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05793-6.
8
Understanding how young African adults interact with peer-generated sexual health information on Facebook and uncovering strategies for successful organic engagement.理解年轻非洲成年人如何在 Facebook 上与同伴生成的性健康信息互动,并揭示成功进行有机参与的策略。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 24;21(1):2153. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12165-x.
9
Expert Opinions on Web-Based Peer Education Interventions for Youth Sexual Health Promotion: Qualitative Study.基于网络的同伴教育干预促进青年性健康的专家意见:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 24;22(11):e18650. doi: 10.2196/18650.
10
Sharing "Sex Secrets" on Facebook: A Content Analysis of Youth Peer Communication and Advice Exchange on Social Media about Sexual Health and Intimate Relations.在脸书上分享“性秘密”:对青少年在社交媒体上关于性健康和亲密关系的同伴交流与建议交换的内容分析
J Health Commun. 2017 Sep;22(9):753-762. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1347217. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventing gambling-related harm among adolescents (PRoGRAM-A): an embedded multi-modal process evaluation in a pilot cluster random control trial.预防青少年赌博相关危害(PRoGRAM - A):一项试点整群随机对照试验中的嵌入式多模式过程评估
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):2327. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23565-8.
2
Effectiveness of an online sexual and reproductive health educational program on knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours among senior primary school students: a cluster randomized controlled trial.一项在线性与生殖健康教育项目对小学生高年级学生知识、态度和行为的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
Reprod Health. 2025 Jul 3;22(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02071-5.
3
Social media in school health promotion: the need for institutional and professional development.学校健康促进中的社交媒体:机构与专业发展的必要性。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Mar 5;40(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae181.
4
Identifying Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Sexual and Relationship Health Intervention within the Child Welfare System: A Mixed Methods Study.识别儿童福利系统中实施性与关系健康干预措施的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究
J Sex Res. 2025 Feb 20:1-15. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2025.2457445.
5
Sexual health services for adolescents on Reunion Island: results from a descriptive interview-based study.留尼汪岛青少年性健康服务:基于描述性访谈的研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 25;14(6):e086952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086952.
6
Using social media for male sexual health: what do we miss? A perspective article on good practices and missing evidence.利用社交媒体促进男性性健康:我们错过了什么?一篇关于良好实践和缺失证据的观点文章。
Int J Impot Res. 2024 Nov;36(7):679-683. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00854-1. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
7
Adolescents and Young Adults Evaluating a Website for Affective-Sexual Information and Education: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.青少年和青年评估情感-性信息和教育网站:多中心横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 26;25:e49962. doi: 10.2196/49962.
8
Promoting sexual health in schools: a systematic review of the European evidence.促进学校中的性健康:欧洲证据的系统回顾。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 4;11:1193422. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1193422. eCollection 2023.
9
A peer-led, school-based social network intervention for young people in the UK, promoting sexual health via social media and conversations with friends: intervention development and optimisation of STASH.一种基于同伴引导、以学校为基础的社交网络干预措施,通过社交媒体和与朋友的对话在英国年轻人中促进性健康:STASH 干预措施的制定和优化。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 11;23(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15541-x.
10
Adolescents and Young Adults Evaluating a Website for Affective-Sexual Information and Education: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol.青少年和年轻人评估情感-性信息和教育网站:一项混合方法研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16586. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416586.

本文引用的文献

1
What are the barriers and challenges faced by adolescents when searching for sexual health information on the internet? Implications for policy and practice from a qualitative study.青少年在互联网上搜索性健康信息时面临哪些障碍和挑战?一项定性研究对政策和实践的启示。
Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Sep;95(6):462-467. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053710. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
2
New digital media interventions for sexual health promotion among young people: a systematic review.用于促进年轻人性健康的新型数字媒体干预措施:一项系统综述。
Sex Health. 2019 Apr;16(2):101-123. doi: 10.1071/SH18127.
3
Targeted advertisement of chlamydia screening on social media: A mixed-methods analysis.社交媒体上针对衣原体筛查的定向广告:一项混合方法分析。
Digit Health. 2019 Feb 1;5:2055207619827193. doi: 10.1177/2055207619827193. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
4
Peer-led intervention to prevent and reduce STI transmission and improve sexual health in secondary schools (STASH): protocol for a feasibility study.同伴主导的干预措施以预防和减少性传播感染在中学的传播并改善性健康(STASH):一项可行性研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Nov 29;4:180. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0354-9. eCollection 2018.
5
The role of digital interventions in sexual health.数字干预在性健康中的作用。
Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Jun;93(4):234-235. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052926. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
6
Social media as a space for support: Young adults' perspectives on producing and consuming user-generated content about diabetes and mental health.作为支持空间的社交媒体:年轻人对创作和消费关于糖尿病与心理健康的用户生成内容的看法。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Dec;170:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
7
Use of social media for sexual health promotion: a scoping review.社交媒体在促进性健康方面的应用:范围综述。
Glob Health Action. 2016 Sep 19;9:32193. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.32193. eCollection 2016.
8
It Starts With Me: Privacy concerns and stigma in the evaluation of a Facebook health promotion intervention.从我做起:脸书健康促进干预评估中的隐私问题与污名化现象。
Sex Health. 2016 Jun;13(3):228-33. doi: 10.1071/SH15231.
9
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
10
Digital media interventions for sexual health promotion-opportunities and challenges: a great way to reach people, particularly those at increased risk of sexual ill health.用于性健康促进的数字媒体干预措施——机遇与挑战:一种接触人群的好方法,尤其是那些性健康不良风险增加的人群。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 3;350:h1099. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1099.

基于学校的性健康干预中社交媒体信息的点对点分享:STASH可行性试验中发现的机遇与挑战

Peer-to-Peer Sharing of Social Media Messages on Sexual Health in a School-Based Intervention: Opportunities and Challenges Identified in the STASH Feasibility Trial.

作者信息

Hirvonen Maija, Purcell Carrie, Elliott Lawrie, Bailey Julia V, Simpson Sharon Anne, McDaid Lisa, Moore Laurence, Mitchell Kirstin Rebecca

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (see Acknowledgments), London, United Kingdom.

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 16;23(2):e20898. doi: 10.2196/20898.

DOI:10.2196/20898
PMID:33591287
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7925155/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a strong interest in the use of social media to spread positive sexual health messages through social networks of young people. However, research suggests that this potential may be limited by a reluctance to be visibly associated with sexual health content on the web or social media and by the lack of trust in the veracity of peer sources.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate opportunities and challenges of using social media to facilitate peer-to-peer sharing of sexual health messages within the context of STASH (Sexually Transmitted Infections and Sexual Health), a secondary school-based and peer-led sexual health intervention.

METHODS

Following training, and as a part of their role, student-nominated peer supporters (aged 14-16 years) invited school friends to trainer-monitored, private Facebook groups. Peer supporters posted curated educational sex and relationship content within these groups. Data came from a feasibility study of the STASH intervention in 6 UK schools. To understand student experiences of the social media component, we used data from 11 semistructured paired and group interviews with peer supporters and their friends (collectively termed students; n=42, aged 14-16 years), a web-based postintervention questionnaire administered to peer supporters (n=88), and baseline and follow-up questionnaires administered to students in the intervention year group (n=680 and n=603, respectively). We carried out a thematic analysis of qualitative data and a descriptive analysis of quantitative data.

RESULTS

Message sharing by peer supporters was hindered by variable engagement with Facebook. The trainer-monitored and private Facebook groups were acceptable to student members (peer supporters and their friends) and reassuring to peer supporters but led to engagement that ran parallel to-rather than embedded in-their routine social media use. The offline context of a school-based intervention helped legitimate and augment Facebook posts; however, even where friends were receptive to STASH messages, they did not necessarily engage visibly on social media. Preferences for content design varied; however, humor, color, and text brevity were important. Preferences for social media versus offline message sharing varied.

CONCLUSIONS

Invitation-only social media groups formed around peer supporters' existing friendship networks hold potential for diffusing messages in peer-based sexual health interventions. Ideally, interactive opportunities should not be limited to single social media platforms and should run alongside offline conversations. There are tensions between offering young people autonomy to engage flexibly and authentically and the need for adult oversight of activities for information accuracy and safeguarding.

摘要

背景

人们对利用社交媒体通过年轻人的社交网络传播积极的性健康信息有着浓厚兴趣。然而,研究表明,这种潜力可能会受到以下因素的限制:不愿在网络或社交媒体上明显地与性健康内容相关联,以及对同龄人信息来源的真实性缺乏信任。

目的

本研究旨在调查在“性传播感染与性健康”(STASH)这一以中学为基础、由同龄人主导的性健康干预背景下,利用社交媒体促进性健康信息在同龄人之间分享的机会和挑战。

方法

经过培训后,学生提名的同龄人支持者(年龄在14 - 16岁)作为其职责的一部分,邀请学校朋友加入由培训师监控的私人Facebook群组。同龄人支持者在这些群组中发布精心策划的性教育和关系方面的内容。数据来自对英国6所学校的STASH干预可行性研究。为了解学生对社交媒体部分的体验,我们使用了来自对同龄人支持者及其朋友(统称为学生;n = 42,年龄在14 - 16岁)进行的11次半结构化配对和小组访谈的数据、向同龄人支持者发放的基于网络的干预后调查问卷(n = 88),以及向干预年级组的学生发放的基线和随访调查问卷(分别为n = 680和n = 603)。我们对定性数据进行了主题分析,对定量数据进行了描述性分析。

结果

同龄人支持者的信息分享受到对Facebook参与度不一的阻碍。由培训师监控的私人Facebook群组为学生成员(同龄人支持者及其朋友)所接受,让同龄人支持者感到安心,但导致的参与与他们日常使用社交媒体的方式并行,而非融入其中。基于学校的干预的线下背景有助于使Facebook帖子合理且更有影响力;然而,即使朋友们接受STASH信息,他们也不一定会在社交媒体上明显参与。对内容设计的偏好各不相同;然而,幽默、色彩和文本简洁很重要。对社交媒体与线下信息分享的偏好也有所不同。

结论

围绕同龄人支持者现有的友谊网络形成的仅限受邀者加入的社交媒体群组,在基于同龄人的性健康干预中具有传播信息的潜力。理想情况下,互动机会不应局限于单一社交媒体平台,而应与线下对话同时进行。在给予年轻人灵活、真实参与的自主权与为确保信息准确性和保障安全而需要成年人对活动进行监督之间存在矛盾。