• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“感觉优越是一个两党共同关注的问题:政治观点的极端程度(而不是方向)预测了感知的信念优越性”的预先注册复制。

Preregistered Replication of "Feeling Superior Is a Bipartisan Issue: Extremity (Not Direction) of Political Views Predicts Perceived Belief Superiority".

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University.

Center for Neural Science, New York University.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;32(3):451-458. doi: 10.1177/0956797620968792. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1177/0956797620968792
PMID:33593174
Abstract

There is currently a debate in political psychology about whether dogmatism and belief superiority are symmetric or asymmetric across the ideological spectrum. Toner, Leary, Asher, and Jongman-Sereno (2013) found that dogmatism was higher among conservatives than liberals, but both conservatives and liberals with extreme attitudes reported higher perceived superiority of beliefs. In the current study, we conducted a preregistered direct and conceptual replication of this previous research using a large nationally representative sample. Consistent with Toner et al.'s findings, our results showed that conservatives had higher dogmatism scores than liberals, whereas both conservative and liberal extreme attitudes were associated with higher belief superiority compared with more moderate attitudes. As in their study, we also found that whether conservative or liberal attitudes were associated with higher belief superiority was topic dependent. Contrasting Toner et al.'s findings, our results also showed that ideologically extreme individuals had higher dogmatism. We discuss implications of these results for theoretical debates in political psychology.

摘要

目前,政治心理学界正在争论教条主义和信仰优越性在意识形态光谱上是对称的还是不对称的。Toner、Leary、Asher 和 Jongman-Sereno(2013 年)发现,保守派比自由派更教条,但态度极端的保守派和自由派都报告称,他们的信仰优越性更高。在当前的研究中,我们使用一个大型全国代表性样本对这项先前的研究进行了预先注册的直接和概念复制。与 Toner 等人的研究结果一致,我们的结果表明,保守派的教条主义得分高于自由派,而与更温和的态度相比,保守派和自由派的极端态度都与更高的信仰优越性相关。与他们的研究一样,我们还发现,无论是保守派还是自由派的态度与更高的信仰优越性相关,这取决于话题。与 Toner 等人的研究结果相反,我们的研究结果还表明,意识形态极端的个体具有更高的教条主义。我们讨论了这些结果对政治心理学理论争论的影响。

相似文献

1
Preregistered Replication of "Feeling Superior Is a Bipartisan Issue: Extremity (Not Direction) of Political Views Predicts Perceived Belief Superiority".“感觉优越是一个两党共同关注的问题:政治观点的极端程度(而不是方向)预测了感知的信念优越性”的预先注册复制。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;32(3):451-458. doi: 10.1177/0956797620968792. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority.优越感是一个两党共同关注的问题:政治观点的极端程度(而不是方向)预测了感知到的信仰优越性。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Dec;24(12):2454-62. doi: 10.1177/0956797613494848. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
3
Partisan ideological attitudes: Liberals are tolerant; the intelligent are intolerant.党派意识形态态度:自由派宽容;聪明人不宽容。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Jun;120(6):1551-1566. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000324. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives.至少偏见是两党都有的:对自由派和保守派党派偏见的元分析比较。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;14(2):273-291. doi: 10.1177/1745691617746796. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
Social and economic ideologies differentially predict prejudice across the political spectrum, but social issues are most divisive.社会和经济意识形态在整个政治光谱中对偏见的预测存在差异,但社会问题最具分裂性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Mar;112(3):383-412. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000074.
6
The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum.自由派和保守派的道德刻板印象:政治光谱上差异的夸大。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050092. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
7
Ideology and prejudice: the role of value conflicts.意识形态与偏见:价值冲突的作用。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Feb 1;24(2):140-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797612447820. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
8
Purity, politics, and polarization: Political ideology moderates threat-induced shifts in moral purity beliefs.纯洁性、政治与两极分化:政治意识形态缓和威胁引发的道德纯洁性信念转变。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Apr;62(2):806-824. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12596. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
9
Is the Political Slant of Psychology Research Related to Scientific Replicability?心理学研究的政治倾向与科学可重复性有关吗?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;15(6):1310-1328. doi: 10.1177/1745691620924463. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
10
Who would mourn democracy? Liberals might, but it depends on who's in charge.谁会哀悼民主?自由派人士可能会,但这取决于谁掌权。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 May;122(5):779-805. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000291. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between political orientation and political knowledge in 45 nations.45个国家中政治倾向与政治知识之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 31;14(1):2590. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53114-z.
2
Truth and Bias, Left and Right: Testing Ideological Asymmetries with a Realistic News Supply.真相与偏见,左派与右派:用现实的新闻供应来检验意识形态不对称性。
Public Opin Q. 2023 Apr 29;87(2):267-292. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfad013. eCollection 2023 Summer.
3
Hedonism as a motive for information search: biased information-seeking leads to biased beliefs.
享乐主义作为信息搜索的动机:有偏差的信息寻求会导致有偏差的信念。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 6;13(1):2086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29429-8.