University of Melbourne, School of Psychological Sciences, Melbourne, 3010, Australia.
Monash University, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Melbourne, 3800, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 6;13(1):2086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29429-8.
Confirmation bias in information-search contributes to the formation of polarized echo-chambers of beliefs. However, the role of valence on information source selection remains poorly understood. In Experiment 1, participants won financial rewards depending on the outcomes of a set of lotteries. They were not shown these outcomes, but instead could choose to view a prediction of each lottery outcome made by one of two sources. Before choosing their favoured source, participants were first shown a series of example predictions made by each. The sources systematically varied in the accuracy and positivity (i.e., how often they predicted a win) of their predictions. Hierarchical Bayesian modeling indicated that both source accuracy and positivity impacted participants' choices. Importantly, those that viewed more positively-biased information believed that they had won more often and had higher confidence in those beliefs. In Experiment 2, we directly assessed the effect of positivity on the perceived credibility of a source. In each trial, participants watched a single source making a series of predictions of lottery outcomes and rated the strength of their beliefs in each source. Interestingly, positively-biased sources were not seen as more credible. Together, these findings suggest that positively-biased information is sought partly due to the desirable emotional state it induces rather than having enhanced perceived credibility. Information sought on this basis nevertheless produced consequential biased beliefs about the world-state, highlighting a potentially key role for hedonic preferences in information selection and subsequent belief formation.
信息搜索中的确认偏差导致了信仰的极化回音室的形成。然而,信息源选择的效价作用仍未得到很好的理解。在实验 1 中,参与者根据一系列彩票的结果赢得了财务奖励。他们没有看到这些结果,而是可以选择查看两个来源中的一个对每个彩票结果的预测。在选择他们喜欢的来源之前,参与者首先看到了每个来源的一系列示例预测。来源在预测的准确性和积极性(即他们预测获胜的频率)方面存在系统差异。层次贝叶斯模型表明,来源的准确性和积极性都影响了参与者的选择。重要的是,那些查看了更偏向正面信息的人认为他们赢得的次数更多,对这些信念的信心也更高。在实验 2 中,我们直接评估了积极性对来源可信度的影响。在每次试验中,参与者观看一个单一的来源对彩票结果进行一系列预测,并对每个来源的信念强度进行评分。有趣的是,偏向正面的来源并没有被认为更可信。这些发现表明,积极的信息之所以被寻求,部分是因为它所带来的令人愉悦的情绪状态,而不是因为它被认为具有更高的可信度。基于这种基础寻求的信息仍然会对世界状态产生有偏差的信念,这突显了享乐偏好在信息选择和随后的信念形成中可能具有关键作用。