• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫苗伦理:新冠疫苗全球分配的伦理框架

Vaccine ethics: an ethical framework for global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.

作者信息

Jecker Nancy S, Wightman Aaron G, Diekema Douglas S

机构信息

University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Bioethics and Humanities, Seattle, Washington, USA

Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric BIoethics, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 16. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107036.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2020-107036
PMID:33593876
Abstract

This paper addresses the just distribution of vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus and sets forth an ethical framework that prioritises frontline and essential workers, people at high risk of severe disease or death, and people at high risk of infection. Section I makes the case that vaccine distribution should occur at a global level in order to accelerate development and fair, efficient vaccine allocation. Section II puts forth ethical values to guide vaccine distribution including helping people with the greatest need, reducing health disparity, saving the most lives and promoting narrow social utility. It also responds to objections which claim that earlier years have more value than later years. Section III puts forth a practical ethical framework to aid decision-makers and compares it with alternatives.

摘要

本文探讨了针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒疫苗的公正分配问题,并提出了一个伦理框架,该框架优先考虑一线和关键岗位工作者、重症或死亡高风险人群以及高感染风险人群。第一部分阐述了疫苗分配应在全球层面进行,以加速疫苗研发以及公平、高效地分配疫苗。第二部分提出了指导疫苗分配的伦理价值观,包括帮助最有需求的人群、减少健康差距、挽救更多生命以及促进狭义的社会效用。它还回应了认为早年比晚年更有价值的反对意见。第三部分提出了一个实用的伦理框架,以帮助决策者,并将其与其他方案进行比较。

相似文献

1
Vaccine ethics: an ethical framework for global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.疫苗伦理:新冠疫苗全球分配的伦理框架
J Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 16. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107036.
2
Multivalue ethical framework for fair global allocation of a COVID-19 vaccine.多值伦理框架公平分配 COVID-19 疫苗。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Aug;46(8):499-501. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106516. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
Out of Africa: A Solidarity-Based Approach to Vaccine Allocation.走出非洲:基于团结的疫苗分配方法。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 May;51(3):27-36. doi: 10.1002/hast.1250. Epub 2021 May 3.
4
Ethical values and principles to guide the fair allocation of resources in response to a pandemic: a rapid systematic review.指导应对大流行病公平分配资源的伦理价值和原则:快速系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jul 7;23(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00806-8.
5
In-Depth Ethical Analysis of the COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout for Migrant Workers in the Gulf Countries.深入分析海湾国家为外来务工人员推出的 COVID-19 疫苗接种计划。
Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2023 Oct;53(4):488-493. doi: 10.1177/27551938231177845. Epub 2023 May 22.
6
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
7
What's yours is ours: waiving intellectual property protections for COVID-19 vaccines.将知识产权保护让渡给 COVID-19 疫苗。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Sep;47(9):595-598. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107555. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
8
Covid-19 vaccine dissemination: A public health ethical evaluation of Pennsylvania's plan during Phase 1A.新冠疫苗的分发:对宾夕法尼亚州1A阶段计划的公共卫生伦理评估
Ethics Med Public Health. 2022 Oct;24:100815. doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2022.100815. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
9
COVID-19 vaccines: ethical framework concerning human challenge studies.COVID-19 疫苗:人体挑战研究的伦理框架。
Daru. 2020 Dec;28(2):807-812. doi: 10.1007/s40199-020-00371-8. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
10
WHO's allocation framework for COVAX: is it fair?世卫组织的新冠疫苗实施计划(COVAX)分配框架:公平吗?
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jul;48(7):434-438. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107152. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
On value compatibility: reflections on the ethical framework for pandemic healthcare distribution.论价值兼容性:关于大流行期间医疗资源分配伦理框架的思考
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Jun;28(2):303-313. doi: 10.1007/s11019-025-10261-y. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
2
Vaccine equity implementation: exploring factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine delivery in the Philippines from an equity lens.疫苗公平性实施:从公平视角探讨菲律宾 COVID-19 疫苗接种的影响因素。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):3058. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20578-7.
3
Racial disparities in Phase 1 COVID-19 vaccine shipments to Neighborhood sites in Pennsylvania by the Federal Retail Pharmacy Program.
宾夕法尼亚州邻里站点的联邦零售药房计划的第一阶段 COVID-19 疫苗配送中的种族差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 10;14(1):23591. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73116-1.
4
Mechanism design for a fair and equitable approach to global vaccine distribution: The case of COVID-19.全球疫苗公平分配的机制设计:以新冠疫情为例
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 28;3(12):e0001711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001711. eCollection 2023.
5
Ethical issues in Nipah virus control and research: addressing a neglected disease.控制尼帕病毒和研究中的伦理问题:应对被忽视的疾病。
J Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 21;50(9):612-617. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109469.
6
Application of Traditional Vaccine Development Strategies to SARS-CoV-2.传统疫苗开发策略在 SARS-CoV-2 中的应用。
mSystems. 2023 Apr 27;8(2):e0092722. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00927-22. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
7
COVID-19 vaccine equity in doldrums: Good governance deficits.新冠疫苗公平性陷入困境:治理不善
Public Adm Dev. 2022 Dec;42(5):293-304. doi: 10.1002/pad.1999. Epub 2022 Dec 4.
8
Ethical implications for children's exclusion in the initial COVID-19 vaccination in Ghana.加纳儿童在新冠疫苗接种初期被排除在外的伦理影响。
Glob Bioeth. 2023 Jan 23;34(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2023.2168170. eCollection 2023.
9
The effect of altruism on COVID-19 vaccination rates.利他主义对新冠疫苗接种率的影响。
Health Econ Rev. 2023 Jan 3;13(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00415-6.
10
Ethical allocation of scarce vaccine doses: The Priority-Equality protocol.稀缺疫苗剂量的伦理分配:优先平等方案。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 13;10:986776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.986776. eCollection 2022.