Richardson C L, Wright M S, Pinto C N
Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, 500, University Drive, 17033 Hershey, PA, United States.
Penn State Law, University Park, PA and Departments of Public Health Sciences and Humanities, Hershey, PA, United States.
Ethics Med Public Health. 2022 Oct;24:100815. doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2022.100815. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
The novel COVID-19 pandemic afforded public health leaders an opportunity to expedite vaccine development and dissemination. The United States found itself faced with the arduous task of ensuring swift and equitable distribution of limited resources, in the midst of often-competing priorities, including public health ethics, medical ethics, economic demands, and societal strains.
Using the American Public Health Association's (APHA) newly revised public health code of ethics, which provides a decision-making framework and guidance for ethical analysis, we analyzed how Pennsylvania's COVID-19 vaccine dissemination plan aligned with the four core functions of public health ethics inquiry.
RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Upon investigation, the state's plan evidenced use of public health ethics in goal setting and design. However, the core public health value given the highest priority, promoting health and safety, competed with the other core public health values of inclusivity and engagement, health justice and equity, and professionalism and trust. Despite known social disparities and risk factors, the state plan for COVID-19 vaccine dissemination aligned closely with federal guidance and prioritized all healthcare personnel and long-term care facility populations over high-risk individuals residing in the community.
CONCLUSION/PERSPECTIVES: Should another pandemic necessitate allocation of scarce resources, especially preventative measures such as vaccines, decision-making agencies must consider disparate populations in planning and dissemination of material to the public. Any anticipated limitations in the ability to fulfill public health ethical principles should be clearly communicated to the public prior to implementation, thereby increasing trust.
新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行使公共卫生领导人有机会加快疫苗的研发和推广。美国发现自己面临着一项艰巨任务,即在公共卫生伦理、医学伦理、经济需求和社会压力等诸多相互竞争的优先事项中,确保有限资源的迅速和公平分配。
我们利用美国公共卫生协会(APHA)新修订的公共卫生伦理准则,该准则为伦理分析提供了决策框架和指导,分析了宾夕法尼亚州的新冠疫苗推广计划如何与公共卫生伦理调查的四项核心功能保持一致。
结果/讨论:经调查,该州的计划在目标设定和设计中体现了对公共卫生伦理的运用。然而,给予最高优先级的核心公共卫生价值,即促进健康和安全,与包容性和参与、健康公正和平等以及专业性和信任等其他核心公共卫生价值相互竞争。尽管存在已知的社会差异和风险因素,但该州的新冠疫苗推广计划与联邦指导方针密切一致,并且将所有医护人员和长期护理机构人群置于社区高危个体之前的优先位置。
结论/观点:如果再次发生大流行需要分配稀缺资源,尤其是像疫苗这样的预防措施,决策机构在规划和向公众分发物资时必须考虑不同人群。在实施之前,应将履行公共卫生伦理原则能力方面的任何预期限制明确告知公众,从而增强信任。