Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Instituto do Coracao (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;23(4):601-613. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2124. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
We examined the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin, compared with placebo, according to aetiology in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) enrolled in the Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse-outcomes in Heart Failure trial (DAPA-HF).
Aetiology was investigator-reported and categorized as ischaemic or non-ischaemic. The primary outcome was the composite of an episode of worsening HF or cardiovascular death. A total of 4744 patients were randomized in DAPA-HF, of whom 2674 (56.4%) patients had an ischaemic aetiology. Participants with an ischaemic aetiology had a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.63], but lower risk of HF hospitalization (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.98) than non-ischaemic patients. Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin reduced the risk of worsening HF or cardiovascular death to a similar extent in both patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic aetiology (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.92, and HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.87, respectively; P for interaction = 0.55). Consistent benefits were observed for the components of the primary outcome and all-cause mortality. Dapagliflozin, as compared with placebo, increased the proportion of patients with an improvement of Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score (KCCQ-TSS) of ≥5 points (P for interaction = 0.32) and decreased the proportion with a deterioration in KCCQ-TSS of ≥5 points (P for interaction = 0.76), irrespective of aetiology. Study drug discontinuation and serious adverse events were similar according to treatment groups, irrespective of aetiology.
Dapagliflozin reduced the risk of worsening HF and death, and improved symptoms, similarly in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic aetiology. In addition, dapagliflozin was safe and well-tolerated, irrespective of aetiology.
我们根据射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的病因,评估达格列净与安慰剂相比的疗效和安全性,这些患者来自 Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse-outcomes in Heart Failure 试验(DAPA-HF)。
病因由研究者报告,并分为缺血性或非缺血性。主要结局是恶化的心力衰竭或心血管死亡的复合事件。共有 4744 名患者在 DAPA-HF 中随机分组,其中 2674 名(56.4%)患者存在缺血性病因。具有缺血性病因的患者发生心血管死亡率的风险更高[风险比(HR)1.35,95%置信区间(CI)1.13-1.63],但心力衰竭住院风险更低[HR 0.83,95%CI 0.70-0.98]。与安慰剂相比,达格列净降低恶化的心力衰竭或心血管死亡风险的程度在缺血性和非缺血性病因患者中相似(HR 0.77,95%CI 0.65-0.92 和 HR 0.71,95%CI 0.58-0.87,分别;P 交互=0.55)。主要结局和全因死亡率的各个组成部分都观察到了一致的益处。与安慰剂相比,达格列净增加了堪萨斯城心肌病问卷总症状评分(KCCQ-TSS)改善≥5 分的患者比例(P 交互=0.32),减少了 KCCQ-TSS 恶化≥5 分的患者比例(P 交互=0.76),无论病因如何。根据治疗组,不论病因如何,停药率和严重不良事件均相似。
达格列净降低了缺血性和非缺血性病因患者恶化的心力衰竭和死亡风险,并改善了症状。此外,达格列净是安全且耐受良好的,与病因无关。