British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
JACC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;10(8):543-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
The Heart Failure Collaboratory (HFC) has developed a score integrating classes and doses of guideline-directed medical therapies prescribed for patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction. One potential use of this score is to test whether new treatments demonstrate incremental benefits, even in patients receiving comprehensive guideline-directed medical therapy.
The authors investigated the efficacy of dapagliflozin according to a modified HFC score in the DAPA-HF (Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse outcomes in Heart Failure) trial.
In DAPA-HF, 4,744 patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction were randomized to dapagliflozin or placebo. The modified HFC score accounted for race and electrocardiogram rhythm and rate, with a maximum possible score of 100%. The primary outcome was the composite of worsening HF or cardiovascular death.
The median modified HFC score was 50% (IQR: 27.5%-62.5%; range 0%-100%). Compared with the lowest tertile, the highest tertile of the treatment score was associated with a lower risk of worsening HF or cardiovascular death (tertile 1, reference; tertile 2, HR: 0.97 [95% CI: 0.82-1.14]; tertile 3, HR: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.70-0.99]). Dapagliflozin reduced the risk of worsening HF or cardiovascular death, irrespective of treatment score (the HRs for dapagliflozin vs placebo from tertile 1 to 3 were: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.61-0.94], 0.76 [95% CI: 0.60-0.97], and 0.71 [95% CI: 0.55-0.90]), respectively; P = 0.89). Consistent benefits were observed for HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and improvement in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score (KCCQ-TTS).
Dapagliflozin, compared with placebo, improved all outcomes examined, regardless of the modified HFC score. This score can be easily calculated in clinical trials and used to evaluate the incremental effects of new treatments. (Study to Evaluate the Effect of Dapagliflozin on the Incidence of Worsening Heart Failure or Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure [DAPA-HF]; NCT03036124).
心力衰竭协作组(HFC)开发了一种评分系统,该系统综合了指南指导的医学治疗方法的类别和剂量,用于治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HF)患者。该评分系统的一个潜在用途是测试新疗法是否具有增量效益,即使在接受全面指南指导的医学治疗的患者中也是如此。
作者在 DAPA-HF(达格列净和预防心力衰竭不良结局)试验中,根据改良的 HFC 评分研究了达格列净的疗效。
在 DAPA-HF 中,4744 名射血分数降低的 HF 患者被随机分配至达格列净或安慰剂组。改良的 HFC 评分考虑了种族和心电图节律和速率,最高得分为 100 分。主要结局为 HF 恶化或心血管死亡的复合终点。
改良 HFC 评分的中位数为 50%(IQR:27.5%-62.5%;范围 0%-100%)。与最低三分位数相比,治疗评分的最高三分位数与 HF 恶化或心血管死亡的风险降低相关(三分位数 1,参考;三分位数 2,HR:0.97 [95%CI:0.82-1.14];三分位数 3,HR:0.83 [95%CI:0.70-0.99])。达格列净降低了 HF 恶化或心血管死亡的风险,与治疗评分无关(从三分位数 1 到 3,达格列净与安慰剂相比的 HR 分别为:0.76 [95%CI:0.61-0.94]、0.76 [95%CI:0.60-0.97]和 0.71 [95%CI:0.55-0.90]);P=0.89)。HF 住院、心血管死亡、全因死亡率和堪萨斯城心肌病问卷总症状评分(KCCQ-TSS)改善的获益一致。
与安慰剂相比,达格列净改善了所有检查结果,与改良的 HFC 评分无关。该评分可在临床试验中轻松计算,并用于评估新疗法的增量效果。(评价达格列净对慢性心力衰竭患者心力衰竭恶化或心血管死亡发生率影响的研究 [DAPA-HF];NCT03036124)。