Empirical assessment of prediction intervals in Cochrane meta-analyses.
作者信息
Al Amer Fahad M, Lin Lifeng
机构信息
Department of Mathematics, College of Science and Arts, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
出版信息
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Jul;51(7):e13524. doi: 10.1111/eci.13524. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Empirical assessment of prediction intervals in Cochrane meta-analyses.Cochrane系统评价中预测区间的实证评估。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Jul;51(7):e13524. doi: 10.1111/eci.13524. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
2
Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study.运用乘法模型对荟萃分析中的异质性进行分析——一项实证研究。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):43-52. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1216. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
3
Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis.呼吁在荟萃分析中常规呈现预测区间。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 12;6(7):e010247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010247.
4
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.在医疗保健干预随机试验的系统评价中，因对结果和分析进行选择性纳入及报告而产生的偏倚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.
5
Meta-analyses in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine: comparison of fixed and random effects models.围产期医学随机对照试验系统评价中的Meta分析：固定效应模型与随机效应模型的比较
Stat Med. 2001 Dec 15;20(23):3635-47. doi: 10.1002/sim.1096.
6
Prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A confidence distribution approach.随机效应荟萃分析的预测区间：置信分布方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1689-1702. doi: 10.1177/0962280218773520. Epub 2018 May 10.
7
A simple method to estimate prediction intervals and predictive distributions: Summarizing meta-analyses beyond means and confidence intervals.一种简单的估计预测区间和预测分布的方法：超越均值和置信区间的元分析总结。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Jun;10(2):255-266. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1345. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
8
Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.利用 Cochrane 系统评价数据库中的实证数据预测荟萃分析中的异质性程度。
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;41(3):818-27. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys041. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
9
Reporting 'number needed to treat' in meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study.报告荟萃分析中的“需要治疗的人数”：一项横断面研究。
J Evid Based Med. 2012 Nov;5(4):232-7. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12002.
10
False-positive findings in Cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review.应用和未应用试验序贯分析的Cochrane系统评价中的假阳性结果：一项实证综述
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 12;6(8):e011890. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011890.
引用本文的文献
1
Efficacy of interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms induced by traumatic medical events: a systematic review.针对创伤性医疗事件所致创伤后应激障碍症状的干预措施的疗效：一项系统评价
Health Psychol Rev. 2025 Jul 16:1-19. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2025.2526666.
2
Prediction Performance of Earlier Studies for Later Studies in Cochrane Reviews.Cochrane系统评价中早期研究对后期研究的预测性能。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;31(4):e70172. doi: 10.1111/jep.70172.
3
Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials: Antidepressants for Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors in Autism Spectrum Disorder.随机对照试验的更新系统评价与荟萃分析：用于自闭症谱系障碍中受限和重复行为的抗抑郁药
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 Oct 2;20:1711-1723. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S465611. eCollection 2024.
4
Efficacy and safety of berberine plus 5-ASA for ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.小檗碱联合 5-氨基水杨酸治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性：系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0309144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309144. eCollection 2024.
本文引用的文献
1
Use of Prediction Intervals in Network Meta-analysis.使用预测区间进行网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199735. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9735.
2
Comparison of four heterogeneity measures for meta-analysis.荟萃分析中四种异质性测量方法的比较。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):376-384. doi: 10.1111/jep.13159. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
3
Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.患者和公众参与对临床试验入组和保留的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4738.
4
Sole reliance on I may mislead.
Heart. 2017 Sep;103(18):1471-1472. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311767.
5
Basics of meta-analysis: I is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity.荟萃分析基础：I 不是异质性的绝对度量。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):5-18. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1230. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
6
Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis.呼吁在荟萃分析中常规呈现预测区间。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 12;6(7):e010247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010247.
7
The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses.异质性统计量I(2)在小型荟萃分析中可能存在偏差。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Apr 14;15:35. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0024-z.
8
The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from meta-analyses.临床和统计学异质性对荟萃分析结果预测值的影响。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Feb;20(2):123-9. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12494.
9
A note on the graphical presentation of prediction intervals in random-effects meta-analyses.关于在随机效应荟萃分析中预测区间图形表示的说明。
Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 28;1:34. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-34.
10
A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis.随机效应荟萃分析的重新评估。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jan;172(1):137-159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x.
Zotero 插件