Suppr超能文献

随机对照试验的更新系统评价与荟萃分析:用于自闭症谱系障碍中受限和重复行为的抗抑郁药

Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials: Antidepressants for Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

作者信息

Maneeton Prapinpatch, Maneeton Benchalak, Winichaikul Yanisa, Kawilapat Suttipong, Kienngam Nongluck, Maneeton Narong

机构信息

Chiang Mai University Demonstration School, Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 Oct 2;20:1711-1723. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S465611. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

In previously randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of antidepressants in restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRBs) in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), outcomes overwhelmingly showed no benefits of antidepressants studied in the larger multisite RCTs over placebo. However, the positive effect of antidepressants in the RRBs found in the small preliminary studies requires confirmation in larger trials. We aimed to systematically review the efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of RRBs in ASD by including RCTs from the SCOPUS, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Clinical Trials.gov, and other databases in January 2024. Analyzing data from 609 participants across nine RCTs showed no significant difference in the overall pooled mean-end score for RRBs between antidepressant- and placebo-treated groups [SMD (95% CI) of -0.25 (-0.53, 0.02), I = 54%, Tau = 0.10, prediction interval = -1.03, 0.53]. In small preliminary studies by one group, the clomipramine-treated group's pooled mean endpoint for obsessive-compulsive symptoms in ASD individuals showed a significantly better outcome than the desipramine-treated group, but in unconfirmed studies. Of the individual antidepressants investigated only clomipramine, and fluvoxamine illustrated some efficacy over placebo in small preliminary studies. These findings need confirmation in larger, multisite randomized controlled trials. There were no significant differences in the overall discontinuation rates or discontinuation due to adverse events between the antidepressant- and placebo-treated groups [RR (95% CI) of 1.30 (0.95, 1.78), I = 0%, and 1.33 (0.71, 2.47), I=0%, respectively]. Common side effects included agitation, appetite disturbance, anorexia, gastrointestinal issues, and sleep disturbance, with no significant differences between the antidepressant and placebo groups. In conclusion, the results regarding the efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of RRBs in ASD are inconsistent. Since previous evidence found a correlation between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms including overactivity and impulsivity, and RRBs, further trials including the use of non-stimulants such as atomoxetine could be conducted.

摘要

在先前关于抗抑郁药治疗自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中受限和重复行为(RRBs)疗效的随机对照试验(RCTs)中,绝大多数结果表明,在规模较大的多中心RCTs中所研究的抗抑郁药相比安慰剂并无益处。然而,小型初步研究中发现抗抑郁药对RRBs有积极作用,这需要在更大规模的试验中得到证实。我们旨在通过纳入2024年1月从SCOPUS、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验注册库、ClinicalTrials.gov及其他数据库获取的RCTs,系统评价抗抑郁药治疗ASD中RRBs的疗效。对来自9项RCTs的609名参与者的数据进行分析显示,抗抑郁药治疗组和安慰剂治疗组RRBs的总体合并平均终点得分无显著差异[标准化均数差(SMD)(95%置信区间)为-0.25(-0.53,0.02),I² = 54%,Tau² = 0.10,预测区间 = -1.03,0.53]。在一组的小型初步研究中,氯米帕明治疗组ASD个体强迫症状的合并平均终点显示比地昔帕明治疗组有显著更好的结果,但研究未经证实。在所研究的个体抗抑郁药中,只有氯米帕明和氟伏沙明在小型初步研究中显示出比安慰剂有一定疗效。这些发现需要在更大规模的多中心随机对照试验中得到证实。抗抑郁药治疗组和安慰剂治疗组的总体停药率或因不良事件导致的停药率无显著差异[相对危险度(RR)(95%置信区间)分别为1.30(0.95,1.78),I² = 0%,以及1.33(0.71,2.47),I² = 0%]。常见副作用包括激动、食欲紊乱、厌食、胃肠道问题和睡眠障碍,抗抑郁药组和安慰剂组之间无显著差异。总之,关于抗抑郁药治疗ASD中RRBs疗效的结果并不一致。由于先前证据发现注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状(包括多动和冲动)与RRBs之间存在关联,可开展进一步试验,包括使用如托莫西汀等非兴奋剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验