• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚合酶链反应方法在艰难梭菌检测中的意义。

Significance of a polymerase chain reaction method in the detection of Clostridioides difficile.

机构信息

Jerónimo Jaqueti Aroca, Laboratorio Clínico, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino, 2. 28942 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Rev Esp Quimioter. 2021 Apr;34(2):141-144. doi: 10.37201/req/010.2020. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

DOI:10.37201/req/010.2020
PMID:33601876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8019460/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clostridioides difficile (CD) is the most common cause of nosocomial diarrhea. Detection of CD toxin in patients' faecal samples is the traditional rapid method for the diagnosis of CD infection. Various testing algorithms have been proposed: an initial screening test using a rapid test, and a confirmatory test (cytotoxicity neutralization assay, toxigenic culture, nucleic acid amplification test) for discordant results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a two-step algorithm using an immunochromatographic test followed of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

METHODS

The specimens have been tested according to the following schedule: 1) Step one: All samples were tested for detection of glutamate dehydrogenase antigen (GDH) and toxin A/B using the C. diff QUIK CHEK Complete test. All GDH and toxins positive results were considered CD positives; 2) Step two: When the results were discrepant (only GDH+ or toxins+), the samples were confirmed using the PCR test BD MAX Cdiff. All PCR positive results were considered CD positives.

RESULTS

A total of 2,138 specimens were initially tested. 139 were positive for GDH and toxins. 160 discrepant results (148 GDH+ and 12 toxins+) were tested by PCR, 117 were positive (107/148 GDH+ and 10/12 toxins+).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a PCR method showed an increase de 117 positive results (73.1% of discrepant). Considering the sensitivity of C.diff QUIK CHEK (instructions of manufacturer), the GDH discrepant results may be false negatives, y the samples PCR and toxins positives may be real positives results.

摘要

目的

艰难梭菌(CD)是医院获得性腹泻最常见的原因。检测患者粪便样本中的 CD 毒素是诊断 CD 感染的传统快速方法。已经提出了各种检测算法:使用快速检测进行初始筛选检测,以及用于不一致结果的确认检测(细胞毒性中和测定、产毒培养、核酸扩增检测)。本研究的目的是评估两步算法(免疫层析试验 followed 聚合酶链反应(PCR))的有效性。

方法

按照以下方案检测标本:1)步骤一:所有样本均使用 C. diff QUIK CHEK Complete 试验检测谷氨酸脱氢酶抗原(GDH)和毒素 A/B。所有 GDH 和毒素阳性结果均视为 CD 阳性;2)步骤二:结果不一致时(仅 GDH+或毒素+),使用 PCR 试验 BD MAX Cdiff 确认样本。所有 PCR 阳性结果均视为 CD 阳性。

结果

共检测了 2138 个标本。有 139 个标本 GDH 和毒素均阳性。160 个不一致结果(148 个 GDH+和 12 个毒素+)用 PCR 检测,117 个阳性(107/148 GDH+和 10/12 毒素+)。

结论

实施 PCR 方法显示阳性结果增加了 117 个(不一致结果的 73.1%)。考虑到 C.diff QUIK CHEK 的灵敏度(制造商的说明),GDH 不一致的结果可能是假阴性,而 PCR 和毒素阳性的样本可能是真正的阳性结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a87a/8019460/8292edeb80eb/revespquimioter-34-141-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a87a/8019460/8292edeb80eb/revespquimioter-34-141-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a87a/8019460/8292edeb80eb/revespquimioter-34-141-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Significance of a polymerase chain reaction method in the detection of Clostridioides difficile.聚合酶链反应方法在艰难梭菌检测中的意义。
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2021 Apr;34(2):141-144. doi: 10.37201/req/010.2020. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
2
Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.BD GeneOhm Cdiff 实时 PCR 检测法与两步法算法和毒素 A/B 酶联免疫吸附试验比较,用于诊断产毒艰难梭菌感染。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):109-14. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01630-09. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
3
Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B.用于检测艰难梭菌谷氨酸脱氢酶及毒素A/B的mariPOC检测的前瞻性评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01872-19.
4
Comparison of Simplexa universal direct PCR with cytotoxicity assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: performance, cost, and correlation with disease.Simplexa 通用直接 PCR 与细胞毒性测定法比较用于艰难梭菌感染的诊断:性能、成本以及与疾病的相关性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Jan;52(1):275-80. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02545-13. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
5
Laboratory comparison between cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and ultrasensitive single molecule counting technology for detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B, PCR, enzyme immunoassays, and multistep algorithms.实验室比较细胞毒性中和测定法与超敏单分子计数技术,用于检测艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B、PCR、酶免疫测定法和多步骤算法。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;95(1):20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
6
High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing.高敏艰难梭菌毒素检测与应用谷氨酸脱氢酶和毒素酶联免疫吸附试验及细胞毒素检测的艰难梭菌实验室算法的高度一致性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jan 28;58(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01629-19.
7
Performances of the BD MAX™ CDIFF assay for the detection of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile using Cary-Blair preserved samples.使用 Cary-Blair 保存的样本,检测产毒艰难梭菌的 BD MAX™ CDIFF 检测法的性能。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Jul;103(3):115701. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115701. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
8
Evaluation of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection Based on Immunochromatography Testing and Toxigenic Culture Assay.基于免疫胶体金渗滤法检测和产毒培养检测对艰难梭菌感染危险因素的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Nov 27;56(12). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00555-18. Print 2018 Dec.
9
Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.评价 tcdB 实时 PCR 在产毒艰难梭菌三步诊断算法中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):124-30. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00734-09. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
10
Detection of toxigenic Clostridioides [Clostridium] difficile: Usefulness of two commercially available enzyme immunoassays and a PCR assay on stool samples and stool isolates.产毒艰难梭菌的检测:两种市售酶免疫测定法及聚合酶链反应法对粪便样本和粪便分离株的应用价值
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2018 Jan-Mar;50(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ram.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a Two-Step Testing Algorithm for Reliable and Cost-Effective Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家三级护理医院中一种两步检测算法用于可靠且经济高效地检测艰难梭菌感染的有效性
Med Sci (Basel). 2019 Jan 8;7(1):6. doi: 10.3390/medsci7010006.
2
Searching for a Potential Algorithm for Clostridium difficile Testing at a Tertiary Care Hospital: Does Toxin Enzyme Immunoassay Testing Help?在一家三级保健医院寻找艰难梭菌检测的潜在算法:毒素酶免疫测定检测是否有帮助?
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jun 25;56(7). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00415-18. Print 2018 Jul.
3
Understanding Clostridium difficile Colonization.
了解艰难梭菌定植。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018 Mar 14;31(2). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00021-17. Print 2018 Apr.
4
Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Quantitation as Predictor of Toxin Presence in Clostridium difficile Infection.核酸扩增试验定量检测对艰难梭菌感染中毒素存在的预测价值。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;56(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01316-17. Print 2018 Mar.
5
in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Study.《炎症性肠病:一项回顾性研究》
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:4803262. doi: 10.1155/2017/4803262. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
6
Comparison of Diagnostic Algorithms for Detecting Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Routine Practice at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Korea.韩国一家三级转诊医院日常实践中检测产毒艰难梭菌的诊断算法比较
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0161139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161139. eCollection 2016.
7
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会:艰难梭菌感染诊断指南文件的更新。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Aug;22 Suppl 4:S63-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
8
[Changes in the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection during 2005-2014 in Salamanca, Spain].[2005年至2014年西班牙萨拉曼卡艰难梭菌感染的流行病学变化]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2016 Aug;29(4):206-13. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
9
[New methodological advances: algorithm proposal for management of Clostridium difficile infection].[新的方法学进展:艰难梭菌感染管理的算法建议]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2015 Jun;28(3):157-9.
10
Underdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile across Europe: the European, multicentre, prospective, biannual, point-prevalence study of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalised patients with diarrhoea (EUCLID).欧洲艰难梭菌诊断不足:艰难梭菌感染的欧洲、多中心、前瞻性、半年期、现患率研究,研究对象为住院腹泻患者(EUCLID)。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Dec;14(12):1208-19. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70991-0. Epub 2014 Nov 7.