Dawson Shoba, Bierce Angel, Feder Gene, Macleod John, Turner Katrina M, Zammit Stan, Lewis Natalia V
Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 18;11(2):e042112. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042112.
Exposure to different types of psychological trauma may lead to a range of adverse effects on trauma survivors, including poor mental and physical health, economic, social and cognitive functioning outcomes. Trauma-informed (TI) approaches to care are defined as a service system grounded in and directed by an understanding of how trauma affects the survivors' neurological, biological, physiological and social development. TI service system involves training of all staff, service improvements and sometimes screening for trauma experiences. The UK started incorporating TI approaches into the National Health Service. While policies recommend it, the evidence base for TI approaches to healthcare is not well established. We aim to conduct a systematic review to synthesise evidence on TI approaches in primary and community mental healthcare globally.
We will undertake a systematic search for primary studies in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane library, websites of organisations involved in the development and implementation of TI approaches in healthcare, and databases of thesis and dissertation. Included studies will be in English published between 1990 and February 2020. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection with data extraction and quality appraisal undertaken by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. A results-based convergent synthesis will be conducted where quantitative (narratively) and qualitative (thematically) evidence will be analysed separately and then integrated using another method of synthesis. We set up a trauma survivor group and a professional group to consult throughout this review.
There is no requirement for ethical approval for this systematic review as no empirical data will be collected. The findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, scientific and practitioner conferences, and policy briefings targeted at local and national policy makers.
CRD42020164752.
接触不同类型的心理创伤可能会给创伤幸存者带来一系列不良影响,包括身心健康不佳、经济、社会和认知功能方面的后果。创伤知情(TI)护理方法被定义为一种服务体系,该体系基于对创伤如何影响幸存者神经、生物、生理和社会发展的理解,并以此为导向。TI服务体系包括对所有工作人员的培训、服务改进,有时还包括对创伤经历的筛查。英国已开始将TI方法纳入国民医疗服务体系。虽然政策上推荐这种方法,但TI医疗保健方法的证据基础并不完善。我们旨在进行一项系统综述,以综合全球初级和社区精神卫生保健中TI方法的证据。
我们将在Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、Cochrane图书馆、参与医疗保健中TI方法开发和实施的组织网站以及论文和学位论文数据库中系统检索原始研究。纳入的研究将是1990年至2020年2月期间发表的英文研究。两名评审员将独立进行研究选择,由一名评审员进行数据提取和质量评估,并由另一名评审员检查准确性。将进行基于结果的收敛性综合分析,定量(叙述性)和定性(主题性)证据将分别进行分析,然后使用另一种综合方法进行整合。我们设立了一个创伤幸存者小组和一个专业小组,在整个综述过程中进行咨询。
由于不会收集实证数据,因此本系统综述无需伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物、科学和从业者会议以及针对地方和国家政策制定者的政策简报进行传播。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD4202J164752 。