Bergman Louise E, Bernhard-Oettel Claudia, Bujacz Aleksandra, Leineweber Constanze, Toivanen Susanna
Section for Work and Organizational Psychology, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 2;11:598303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.598303. eCollection 2020.
Studies investigating differences in mental health problems between self-employed and employed workers have provided contradictory results. Many of the studies utilized scales validated for employed workers, without collecting validity evidence for making comparisons with self-employed. The aim of this study was (1) to collect validity evidence for three different scales assessing depressive symptoms, emotional exhaustion, and sleep disturbances for employed workers, and combinators; and (2) to test if these groups differed. We first conducted approximate measurement invariance analysis and found that all scales were invariant at the scalar level. Self-employed workers had least mental health problems and employed workers had most, but differences were small. Though we found the scales invariant, we do not find them optimal for comparison of means. To be more precise in describing differences between groups, we recommend using clinical cut-offs or scales developed with the specific purpose of assessing mental health problems at work.
调查个体经营者和受雇员工心理健康问题差异的研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。许多研究使用了针对受雇员工验证过的量表,却未收集用于与个体经营者进行比较的效度证据。本研究的目的是:(1)为评估受雇员工、个体经营者的抑郁症状、情绪耗竭和睡眠障碍的三种不同量表收集效度证据;(2)检验这些群体之间是否存在差异。我们首先进行了近似测量不变性分析,发现所有量表在标量水平上都是不变的。个体经营者的心理健康问题最少,受雇员工的最多,但差异很小。虽然我们发现量表是不变的,但我们并不认为它们最适合用于均值比较。为了更精确地描述群体之间的差异,我们建议使用临床临界值或专门为评估工作中的心理健康问题而开发的量表。