Baudin Christian, Nilsson Thomas, Sturup Joakim, Wallinius Märta, Andiné Peter
Centre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, National Board of Forensic Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 2;12:625996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.625996. eCollection 2021.
'The Static-99R is one of the most commonly used risk assessment instruments for individuals convicted of sexual offenses. It has been validated for use on many populations, but few studies specifically target and describe individuals with mental disorders. Additionally, research on the discriminative properties (how well the instrument separates recidivists from non-recidivists) of the instrument over longer follow-up periods is scarce. This article evaluated the validity of the Static-99R using a cohort of individuals with mental disorders convicted of sexual offenses in Sweden ( = 146) with fixed 5-year ( = 100), 10-year ( = 91), 15-year ( = 79), and 20-year ( = 36) follow-up periods. A Static-99R cut score of 6 demonstrated the highest Youden index, maximizing sensitivity (72.7%) and specificity (74.2%), with 25.8% of recidivists correctly assumed to reoffend sexually and 95.7% of non-recidivists correctly assumed not to. The Static-99R instrument demonstrated adequate discrimination (AUC = 0.79, CI 95% = 0.70-0.87, and OR = 1.45, CI 95% = 1.14-1.84, < 0.001, 5-year fixed follow-up), with only marginal differences for 10-, 15-, and 20-year fixed follow-up (AUC = 0.73, 0.74, and 0.74 and OR = 1.31, 1.36, and 1.40, respectively). Calibration (quantifying risk and correspondence with the instrument's norms) was acceptable (Brier = 0.088, P/E = 0.70, E/O = 1.43), with the routine sample norms displaying a decisively better fit to the study cohort compared to the high-risk/high-need sample norms. The results affirm the recommendation that, when in doubt and where there is no recent local norm group large enough available, the Static-99R routine sample found in the evaluators' workbook should be used.
Static-99R是性犯罪定罪者最常用的风险评估工具之一。它已在许多人群中得到验证,但很少有研究专门针对患有精神障碍的个体并对其进行描述。此外,关于该工具在更长随访期内的判别特性(该工具区分累犯和非累犯的能力)的研究很少。本文使用瑞典146名患有精神障碍的性犯罪定罪者队列,在固定的5年(n = 100)、10年(n = 91)、15年(n = 79)和20年(n = 36)随访期内评估了Static-99R的有效性。Static-99R的临界值为6时,尤登指数最高,敏感性(72.7%)和特异性(74.2%)达到最大化,25.8%的累犯被正确预测会再次实施性犯罪,95.7%的非累犯被正确预测不会再次实施性犯罪。Static-99R工具显示出足够的判别能力(AUC = 0.79,95%CI = 0.70 - 0.87,OR = 1.45,95%CI = 1.14 - 1.84,P < 0.001,5年固定随访),10年、15年和20年固定随访时仅有微小差异(AUC分别为0.73、0.74和0.74,OR分别为1.31、1.36和1.40)。校准(量化风险以及与工具规范的对应关系)是可接受的(Brier = 0.088,P/E = 0.70,E/O = 1.43),与高风险/高需求样本规范相比,常规样本规范与研究队列的拟合度明显更好。结果证实了以下建议:当存在疑问且没有足够大的近期本地规范组时,应使用评估人员工作手册中的Static-99R常规样本。