Cope Colin G, Eysenbach Sarah R, Faidiga Alexandra S, Hausman Constance E, Medeiros Juliana S, Murphy Jennifer E, Burns Jean H
Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cleveland Metroparks, Parma, OH, USA.
AoB Plants. 2020 Dec 29;13(1):plaa073. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plaa073. eCollection 2021 Feb.
We test whether the invasive earthworm and leaf litter of the invasive herbaceous plant interact to influence the native plant, , using both observational field data and a multi-year experiment. We hypothesized invader interactive effects on the native plant might result from either changes in allelochemical distribution in the soil or nutrient availability mediated by the invasive earthworm pulling leaf litter down into the soil. Within the field data we found that presence and higher soil nitrogen correlated with reduced cover, and no evidence for an invader-invader interaction. Within the factorial experiment, we found a super-additive effect of the two invaders on plant biomass only when activated carbon was present. In the absence of activated carbon, there were no differences in biomass across treatments. In the presence of activated carbon, biomass was significantly reduced by the presence of both and leaf litter. The absence of an effect of leaves without activated carbon, combined with a failure to detect arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization, suggests that indirect effects of allelochemicals on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were not the primary driver of treatment responses. Rather direct nutrient availability might influence a potential interaction between these invaders. Leaf nitrogen content was higher and leaf CO concentration was lower in the presence of , but treatment did not influence maximum photosynthetic rate. While the field data do not suggest a negative interaction between these invaders, the experiment suggests that such an interaction is possible with greater environmental stress, such as increasing nitrogen deposition. Further, even plants with rapid physiological responses to increased nitrogen availability may have other physiological limits on growth that prevent them from compensating from the harm caused by multiple invaders.
我们利用实地观测数据和一项多年实验,来测试入侵蚯蚓和入侵草本植物的落叶是否相互作用,从而影响本土植物。我们假设,入侵物种对本土植物的交互作用可能源于土壤中化感物质分布的变化,或者是入侵蚯蚓将落叶拖入土壤所介导的养分有效性变化。在实地观测数据中,我们发现本土植物的存在和较高的土壤氮含量与本土植物覆盖度降低相关,且没有证据表明入侵物种之间存在交互作用。在析因实验中,我们发现只有当活性炭存在时,这两种入侵物种对植物生物量才有超加性效应。在没有活性炭的情况下,各处理间的生物量没有差异。在有活性炭的情况下,入侵蚯蚓和入侵草本植物的落叶同时存在会使生物量显著降低。没有活性炭时入侵草本植物的落叶没有影响,再加上未检测到丛枝菌根定殖,这表明化感物质对丛枝菌根真菌的间接影响不是处理响应的主要驱动因素。相反,直接的养分有效性可能会影响这些入侵物种之间的潜在相互作用。在有入侵蚯蚓的情况下,叶片氮含量较高,叶片二氧化碳浓度较低,但处理并未影响最大光合速率。虽然实地观测数据并未表明这些入侵物种之间存在负面相互作用,但实验表明,在更大的环境压力下,如增加氮沉降,这种相互作用是可能的。此外,即使是对增加的氮有效性有快速生理响应的植物,其生长可能也存在其他生理限制,从而使其无法补偿多种入侵物种造成的危害。