Department of Breast Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Department of Emergency and Organ Transplants, School of Medicine, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Cytopathology. 2021 May;32(3):312-317. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12959. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
Air-dried slide preparation for fine needle aspiration cytology procedures is currently considered unsafe because of the risk of infectious aerosols of coronavirus 19. This study compares the safety and accuracy of two different protocols, one with and one without air-dried slides.
Starting from 3 March 2020, we discontinued the use of air-dried slides during breast fine needle aspiration procedures. We selected cases collected during two periods: 2 months before and 2 months after 3 March. In both groups, the number of procedures was recorded together with the distribution of the diagnostic categories and the concordance between cytological and histological results on surgical specimens for lesions suggestive of malignancy, using the chi-squared test.
Of the 100 procedures performed during the pre-COVID-19 period, 55% were negative (C2), 3% were non-diagnostic (C1) and 40% were positive (C4 or C5). Of the 75 procedures obtained during the COVID-19 period, 44% were negative (C2), 2.7% were non-diagnostic (C1) and 52% were positive (C4 or C5). Despite the use of a new protocol during the COVID-19 period, we observed concordance between cytological and histological results for lesions suggestive of malignancy. There was no statistically significant difference concerning the distribution of the diagnostic categories in the two groups.
Taking into account the slightly lower number of procedures being analysed during the COVID-19 period, the introduction of a new protocol that does not include air-dried slides is safe and reliable.
由于新冠病毒 19 传染性气溶胶的风险,目前认为空气干燥的幻灯片准备用于细针抽吸细胞学程序是不安全的。本研究比较了两种不同方案的安全性和准确性,一种方案包含空气干燥的幻灯片,另一种方案不包含空气干燥的幻灯片。
从 2020 年 3 月 3 日起,我们停止在乳腺细针抽吸程序中使用空气干燥的幻灯片。我们选择了在两个时期收集的病例:在 3 月 3 日之前的 2 个月和之后的 2 个月。在两组中,记录了程序的数量,以及诊断类别分布和对疑似恶性病变的手术标本的细胞学和组织学结果的一致性,使用卡方检验。
在 COVID-19 前期间进行的 100 例手术中,55%为阴性(C2),3%为非诊断性(C1),40%为阳性(C4 或 C5)。在 COVID-19 期间获得的 75 例手术中,44%为阴性(C2),2.7%为非诊断性(C1),52%为阳性(C4 或 C5)。尽管在 COVID-19 期间使用了新方案,但我们观察到疑似恶性病变的细胞学和组织学结果之间的一致性。两组之间诊断类别的分布没有统计学上的显著差异。
考虑到 COVID-19 期间分析的程序数量略少,引入不包括空气干燥幻灯片的新方案是安全可靠的。