• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简化对多个背景变量测量不变性的评估:使用正则化调节非线性因子分析检测项目功能差异

Simplifying the Assessment of Measurement Invariance over Multiple Background Variables: Using Regularized Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis to Detect Differential Item Functioning.

作者信息

Bauer Daniel J, Belzak William C M, Cole Veronica

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Center for Developmental Science, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

Struct Equ Modeling. 2020;27(1):43-55. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2019.1642754. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1080/10705511.2019.1642754
PMID:33132679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7596881/
Abstract

Determining whether measures are equally valid for all individuals is a core component of psychometric analysis. Traditionally, the evaluation of measurement invariance (MI) involves comparing independent groups defined by a single categorical covariate (e.g., men and women) to determine if there are any items that display differential item functioning (DIF). More recently, Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis (MNLFA) has been advanced as an approach for evaluating MI/DIF simultaneously over multiple background variables, categorical and continuous. Unfortunately, conventional procedures for detecting DIF do not scale well to the more complex MNLFA. The current manuscript therefore proposes a regularization approach to MNLFA estimation that penalizes the likelihood for DIF parameters (i.e., rewarding sparse DIF). This procedure avoids the pitfalls of sequential inference tests, is automated for end users, and is shown to perform well in both a small-scale simulation and an empirical validation study.

摘要

确定测量方法对所有个体是否同样有效是心理测量分析的核心组成部分。传统上,测量不变性(MI)的评估涉及比较由单个分类协变量定义的独立组(例如,男性和女性),以确定是否存在显示差异项目功能(DIF)的项目。最近,调节非线性因子分析(MNLFA)已被提出作为一种同时在多个分类和连续背景变量上评估MI/DIF的方法。不幸的是,检测DIF的传统程序在更复杂的MNLFA上扩展性不佳。因此,当前的手稿提出了一种用于MNLFA估计的正则化方法,该方法对DIF参数的似然性进行惩罚(即奖励稀疏DIF)。此程序避免了顺序推断检验的陷阱,为最终用户实现了自动化,并且在小规模模拟和实证验证研究中均表现良好。

相似文献

1
Simplifying the Assessment of Measurement Invariance over Multiple Background Variables: Using Regularized Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis to Detect Differential Item Functioning.简化对多个背景变量测量不变性的评估:使用正则化调节非线性因子分析检测项目功能差异
Struct Equ Modeling. 2020;27(1):43-55. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2019.1642754. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
2
Comprehensive measurement invariance of alcohol outcome expectancies among adolescents using regularized moderated nonlinear factor analysis.采用正则化调节非线性因子分析对青少年酒精预期结果进行全面测量不变性评估。
Addict Behav. 2022 Jan;124:107088. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107088. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
3
DIF Statistical Inference Without Knowing Anchoring Items.不知晓锚定项目的 DIF 统计推断。
Psychometrika. 2023 Dec;88(4):1097-1122. doi: 10.1007/s11336-023-09930-9. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
4
A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning.更一般的测量不变性和项目区分功能检验模型。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):507-526. doi: 10.1037/met0000077. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
5
Improving the assessment of measurement invariance: Using regularization to select anchor items and identify differential item functioning.改进测量不变性评估:使用正则化选择锚定项目并识别差异项目功能。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Dec;25(6):673-690. doi: 10.1037/met0000253. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
6
Bayesian penalty methods for evaluating measurement invariance in moderated nonlinear factor analysis.用于在调节非线性因子分析中评估测量不变性的贝叶斯惩罚方法。
Psychol Methods. 2025 Jun;30(3):482-512. doi: 10.1037/met0000552. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
7
Identification of sources of DIF using covariates in patient-reported outcome measures: a simulation study comparing two approaches based on Rasch family models.在患者报告结局测量中使用协变量识别差异项目功能的来源:一项基于Rasch族模型比较两种方法的模拟研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1191107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191107. eCollection 2023.
8
Simplifying the implementation of modern scale scoring methods with an automated R package: Automated moderated nonlinear factor analysis (aMNLFA).使用自动化 R 包简化现代量表评分方法的实施:自动化适度非线性因子分析 (aMNLFA)。
Addict Behav. 2019 Jul;94:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.031. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
9
The Impact and Detection of Uniform Differential Item Functioning for Continuous Item Response Models.连续项目反应模型中均匀差异项目功能的影响与检测
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Oct;83(5):929-952. doi: 10.1177/00131644221111993. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
10
Assessing measurement invariance with moderated nonlinear factor analysis using the R package OpenMx.使用 R 包 OpenMx 进行有调节的非线性因子分析评估测量不变性。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Apr;29(2):388-406. doi: 10.1037/met0000501. Epub 2022 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement of Connectedness with Nature: Evidence of Validity and Reliability for Use in Colombian Urban and Rural Sustainability Contexts.与自然的连通性测量:在哥伦比亚城乡可持续发展背景下使用的有效性和可靠性证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jul 29;22(8):1185. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081185.
2
Evaluating the Performance of a Regularized Differential Item Functioning Method for Testlet-Based Polytomous Items.评估基于测验题组的多值项目的正则化差异项目功能方法的性能。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 May 31:00131644251342512. doi: 10.1177/00131644251342512.
3
Construct Validity and Reliability of the 'Lifestyle (PAHO) in the Adult Population' Questionnaire.

本文引用的文献

1
Recovering Predictor-Criterion Relations Using Covariate-Informed Factor Score Estimates.使用协变量信息因子得分估计来恢复预测变量与标准变量的关系。
Struct Equ Modeling. 2018;25(6):860-875. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2018.1473773. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
Anchor Selection Strategies for DIF Analysis: Review, Assessment, and New Approaches.差异项目功能分析的锚定选择策略:综述、评估及新方法
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Feb;75(1):22-56. doi: 10.1177/0013164414529792. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
3
A penalized likelihood method for multi-group structural equation modelling.
《成人人群中“生活方式(泛美卫生组织)”问卷》的结构效度和信度
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2025 May 5;14:27536130251340403. doi: 10.1177/27536130251340403. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Exploring the Evidence to Interpret Differential Item Functioning via Response Process Data.通过反应过程数据探索解释项目功能差异的证据。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Nov 29:00131644241298975. doi: 10.1177/00131644241298975.
5
Assessing Whether Negative Parenting Cognitions Bias Parent Report of Preschoolers' Externalizing Symptoms: A Regularized Moderated Non-Linear Factor Analysis Approach.评估消极育儿认知是否会使父母对学龄前儿童外化症状的报告产生偏差:一种正则化的适度非线性因素分析方法。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 Feb;53(2):207-220. doi: 10.1007/s10802-024-01257-y. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
6
Modelling nonlinear moderation effects with local structural equation modelling (LSEM): A non-technical introduction.使用局部结构方程模型(LSEM)对非线性调节效应进行建模:非技术介绍。
Int J Psychol. 2025 Feb;60(1):e13259. doi: 10.1002/ijop.13259. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
7
Bayesian Adaptive Lasso for Detecting Item-Trait Relationship and Differential Item Functioning in Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models.贝叶斯自适应套索在多维项目反应理论模型中检测项目特征关系和项目区分功能
Psychometrika. 2024 Dec;89(4):1337-1365. doi: 10.1007/s11336-024-09998-x. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
8
Empathy and Autism: Establishing the Structure and Different Manifestations of Empathy in Autistic Individuals Using the Perth Empathy Scale.同理心与自闭症:使用珀斯同理心量表确定自闭症个体同理心的结构和不同表现形式。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06491-3.
9
Using Interpretable Machine Learning for Differential Item Functioning Detection in Psychometric Tests.在心理测量测试中使用可解释机器学习进行项目功能差异检测。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2024 Jul;48(4-5):167-186. doi: 10.1177/01466216241238744. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
10
Using moderated nonlinear factor models to adjust for differential item functioning in the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale from kindergarten to Grade 6.采用有调节的非线性因子模型来调整幼儿园到 6 年级学生-教师关系量表中的差异项目功能。
J Sch Psychol. 2024 Aug;105:101324. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101324. Epub 2024 May 25.
一种用于多组结构方程建模的惩罚似然方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2018 Nov;71(3):499-522. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12130. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
4
An alternative to post hoc model modification in confirmatory factor analysis: The Bayesian lasso.在验证性因子分析中替代事后模型修正的方法:贝叶斯套索。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Dec;22(4):687-704. doi: 10.1037/met0000112.
5
Improving Factor Score Estimation Through the Use of Observed Background Characteristics.通过使用观察到的背景特征改进因子得分估计。
Struct Equ Modeling. 2016;23(6):827-844. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1220839. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
6
Latent Variable Selection for Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models via [Formula: see text] Regularization.通过[公式:见原文]正则化进行多维项目反应理论模型的潜在变量选择
Psychometrika. 2016 Dec;81(4):921-939. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9529-6. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
7
Regularized Structural Equation Modeling.正则化结构方程模型
Struct Equ Modeling. 2016;23(4):555-566. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1154793. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
8
A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning.更一般的测量不变性和项目区分功能检验模型。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):507-526. doi: 10.1037/met0000077. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
9
A Cautionary Note on Using G(2)(dif) to Assess Relative Model Fit in Categorical Data Analysis.关于在分类数据分析中使用G(2)(dif)评估相对模型拟合的警示说明。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2006 Mar 1;41(1):55-64. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_4.
10
Using Lasso for Predictor Selection and to Assuage Overfitting: A Method Long Overlooked in Behavioral Sciences.使用套索法进行预测变量选择并缓解过度拟合:行为科学中长期被忽视的一种方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(5):471-84. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1036965.