Estreder Yolanda, Martínez-Tur Vicente, Tomás Inés, Maniezki Alice, Ramos José, Pătraş Luminiţa
IDOCAL-University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
IDOCAL-University of Valencia and IVIE, Valencia, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 4;11:617622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.617622. eCollection 2020.
To achieve their goals, organizations for individuals with intellectual disability have to stimulate high-quality relationships between professionals and family members. Therefore, achieving professionals' trust in family members has become a challenge. One relevant factor in explaining professional's trust in families is the degree to which family members use the "problem-solving" conflict management strategy (high concern for oneself but also for the other party) in their disputes-disagreements with professionals. It is reasonable to argue that when family members use problem-solving conflict management, professionals' trust increases. Professionals' trust, in turn, stimulates the use of problem-solving strategies by family members. However, it is also plausible that professionals are the initiators of this positive spiral (professionals' trust-problem-solving conflict management by family members-professionals' trust). To examine this relationship between problem solving and trust over time, we conducted a longitudinal survey study in which 329 professionals reported on these two constructs three times (with 4 weeks between the measurements). Using structural equation modeling, we compared four nested models: (a) stability, (b) causality (where the problem-solving strategy by familiar members is the initiator of the spiral), (c) reversed causation (where the professional's trust is the initiator of the spiral), and (d) reciprocal (where problem-solving conflict management and trust reinforce each other). The results of the χ difference tests, regarding the comparison of the models, showed that the reciprocal model was significantly superior to the alternative proposals. Our findings supported a complex view of the relationships between problem-solving conflict management and trust, based on dynamic reciprocal relationships over time.
为实现其目标,为智障人士服务的组织必须促进专业人员与家庭成员之间建立高质量的关系。因此,赢得专业人员对家庭成员的信任已成为一项挑战。解释专业人员对家庭信任的一个相关因素是家庭成员在与专业人员发生争执分歧时使用“解决问题”冲突管理策略(高度关注自身同时也关注对方)的程度。有理由认为,当家庭成员采用解决问题的冲突管理方式时,专业人员的信任会增加。反过来,专业人员的信任又会促使家庭成员采用解决问题的策略。然而,也有可能专业人员是这种积极循环(专业人员的信任 - 家庭成员的解决问题冲突管理 - 专业人员的信任)的发起者。为了研究解决问题与信任之间随时间变化的这种关系,我们进行了一项纵向调查研究,329名专业人员三次报告这两个构念(测量之间间隔4周)。使用结构方程模型,我们比较了四个嵌套模型:(a)稳定性模型,(b)因果关系模型(家庭成员的解决问题策略是循环的发起者),(c)反向因果关系模型(专业人员的信任是循环的发起者),以及(d)相互作用模型(解决问题的冲突管理和信任相互强化)。关于模型比较的χ差异检验结果表明,相互作用模型明显优于其他模型。我们的研究结果支持了一种基于随时间动态相互关系的解决问题冲突管理与信任之间关系的复杂观点。