Ballespí Sergi, Vives Jaume, Sharp Carla, Chanes Lorena, Barrantes-Vidal Neus
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 3;12:566254. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.566254. eCollection 2021.
Research suggests that the ability to understand one's own and others' minds, or mentalizing, is a key factor for mental health. Most studies have focused the attention on the association between global measures of mentalizing and specific disorders. In contrast, very few studies have analyzed the association between specific mentalizing polarities and global measures of mental health. This study aimed to evaluate whether self and other polarities of mentalizing are associated with a multidimensional notion of mental health, which considers symptoms, functioning, and well-being. Additionally, the level or depth of mentalizing within each polarity was also analyzed. A sample of 214 adolescents (12-18 years old, = 14.7, and SD = 1.7; 53.3% female) was evaluated on measures of self- (Trait Meta-Mood Scale or TMMS-24) and other- mentalizing (Adolescent Mentalizing Interview or AMI), multi-informed measures of psychopathology and functioning based on Achenbach's system, and measures of psychological well-being (self-esteem, happiness, and motivation to life goals). Results revealed no association between mentalizing polarities and higher-order symptom factors (internalizing, externalizing, and global symptoms or "" factor). Self-mentalizing was associated with self-esteem ( = 0.076, < 0.0005) and motivation to life goals ( = 0.209, = 0.002), and other-mentalizing was associated to general, social and role functioning ( = 0.475, < 0.0005; = 0.380, = 0.005; and = 0.364, = 0.004). This association between aspects of self-other mentalizing and self-other function has important implications for treatment and prevention. Deeper mentalizing within each polarity (i.e., comprehension beyond simple attention to one's own mental states, and mentalizing referred to attachment figures vs. mentalizing referred to the characters of a story) revealed stronger associations with functioning and well-being. Because mentalizing polarities are associated with functioning and well-being but not with symptoms, a new hypothesis is developed: mentalizing does not contribute to resiliency by preventing symptoms, but by helping to deal with them, thus improving functioning and well-being independently of psychopathology. These findings support that promoting mentalizing across development may improve mental health, even in non-clinical population.
研究表明,理解自己和他人心理的能力,即心理化能力,是心理健康的关键因素。大多数研究都将注意力集中在心理化的整体测量与特定障碍之间的关联上。相比之下,很少有研究分析特定心理化极性与心理健康整体测量之间的关联。本研究旨在评估心理化的自我和他人极性是否与心理健康的多维概念相关,该概念考虑了症状、功能和幸福感。此外,还分析了每个极性内心理化的水平或深度。对214名青少年(年龄在12至18岁之间,平均年龄 = 14.7,标准差 = 1.7;女性占53.3%)进行了评估,评估内容包括自我心理化测量(特质元情绪量表或TMMS - 24)和他人心理化测量(青少年心理化访谈或AMI)、基于阿chenbach系统的多信息心理病理学和功能测量,以及心理健康测量(自尊、幸福感和生活目标动机)。结果显示,心理化极性与高阶症状因素(内化、外化和整体症状或“p”因素)之间没有关联。自我心理化与自尊(r = 0.076,p < 0.0005)和生活目标动机(r = 0.209,p = 0.002)相关,他人心理化与总体、社会和角色功能相关(r = 0.475,p < 0.0005;r = 0.380,p = 0.005;r = 0.364,p = 0.004)。自我 - 他人心理化方面与自我 - 他人功能之间的这种关联对治疗和预防具有重要意义。每个极性内更深层次的心理化(即超越对自身心理状态的简单关注的理解,以及针对依恋对象的心理化与针对故事角色的心理化)显示出与功能和幸福感更强的关联。由于心理化极性与功能和幸福感相关,但与症状无关,因此提出了一个新的假设:心理化并非通过预防症状来促进心理韧性,而是通过帮助应对症状来实现,从而独立于心理病理学来改善功能和幸福感。这些发现支持了在整个发展过程中促进心理化可能会改善心理健康,即使在非临床人群中也是如此。