Zhao Xinli, Xiao Zhihong, Li Bin, Li Hongwei, Yang Bo, Li Tian, Mei Zubing
Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
Department of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Jan 31;13:1758835920987650. doi: 10.1177/1758835920987650. eCollection 2021.
Although various serum and tissue biomarkers have been investigated for glioma diagnosis, no gold standard has been identified. miRNA-21 was demonstrated to be a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of various brain tumors, whereas there remains uncertainty concerning whether miRNA-21 could be used as a good clinical diagnostic biomarker for glioma. The current meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of miRNA-21 as a potent biomarker in adults with suspected glioma.
The Pubmed and Embase databases were searched systematically from inception to January 2020 to identify relevant research reports. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to determine the source of heterogeneity and test the robustness of the results.
From 5394 citations with 997 subjects that met the inclusion criteria, 11 studies were selected. Summary estimates of the diagnostic performance of miRNA-21 were as follows: sensitivity, 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.89]; specificity, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85-0.96); PLR, 10.20 (95% CI: 5.10-20.30); NLR, 0.19 (95% CI: 0.12-0.31); and DOR, 54 (95% CI: 19-155). The area under the SROC curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96). Deeks's funnel plot revealed no evidence of publication bias ( = 0.59). Meta-regression analysis suggested that study publication year could attribute to the heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis found miRNA-21 had a constant high diagnostic accuracy across different ethnicity, glioma grade, sample source, and study region.
This meta-analysis demonstrated that miRNA-21 has high diagnostic performance and could serve as a promising noninvasive diagnostic marker for glioma. Further large prospective studies are needed to validate its diagnostic value and its prognostic significance and therapeutic effects.
尽管已对多种血清和组织生物标志物进行了胶质瘤诊断研究,但尚未确定金标准。miRNA - 21被证明是诊断多种脑肿瘤的有前景的生物标志物,然而miRNA - 21是否可作为胶质瘤良好的临床诊断生物标志物仍存在不确定性。当前的荟萃分析旨在评估miRNA - 21作为疑似胶质瘤成人患者有效生物标志物的诊断准确性。
系统检索了从数据库建库至2020年1月的Pubmed和Embase数据库,以识别相关研究报告。计算合并敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和诊断比值比(DOR)。采用汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线评估总体诊断性能。进行Meta回归和亚组分析以确定异质性来源并检验结果的稳健性。
从5394篇文献中的997名符合纳入标准的受试者中,选取了11项研究。miRNA - 21诊断性能的汇总估计如下:敏感度为0.83[95%置信区间(CI):0.73 - 0.89];特异度为0.92(95%CI:0.85 - 0.96);PLR为10.20(95%CI:5.10 - 20.30);NLR为0.19(95%CI:0.12 - 0.31);DOR为54(95%CI:19 - 155)。SROC曲线下面积为0.94(95%CI:0.92 - 0.96)。Deeks漏斗图显示无发表偏倚证据(=0.59)。Meta回归分析表明研究发表年份可能是异质性的原因。亚组分析发现miRNA - 21在不同种族、胶质瘤分级、样本来源和研究地区均具有持续较高的诊断准确性。
本荟萃分析表明,miRNA - 21具有较高的诊断性能,可作为胶质瘤有前景的非侵入性诊断标志物。需要进一步开展大型前瞻性研究以验证其诊断价值、预后意义和治疗效果。