文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Prediction of Pathological Upgrading at Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Texture Features and Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps.

作者信息

Xie Jinke, Li Basen, Min Xiangde, Zhang Peipei, Fan Chanyuan, Li Qiubai, Wang Liang

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, United States.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 4;10:604266. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.604266. eCollection 2020.


DOI:10.3389/fonc.2020.604266
PMID:33614487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7890009/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a combination of texture features and machine learning-based analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for the prediction of Grade Group (GG) upgrading in Gleason score (GS) ≤6 prostate cancer (PCa) (GG1) and GS 3 + 4 PCa (GG2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients who were biopsy-proven to have GG1 or GG2 and underwent MRI examination with the same MRI scanner prior to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systemic biopsy were included. All these patients received radical prostatectomy to confirm the final GG. Patients were divided into training cohort and test cohort. 94 texture features were extracted from ADC maps for each patient. The independent sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to identify the texture features with statistically significant differences between GG upgrading group and GG non-upgrading group. Texture features of GG1 and GG2 were compared based on the final pathology of radical prostatectomy. We used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm to filter features. Four supervised machine learning methods were employed. The prediction performance of each model was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The statistical comparison between AUCs was performed. RESULTS: Six texture features were selected for the machine learning models building. These texture features were significantly different between GG upgrading group and GG non-upgrading group ( < 0.05). The six features had no significant difference between GG1 and GG2 based on the final pathology of radical prostatectomy. All machine learning methods had satisfactory predictive efficacy. The diagnostic performance of nearest neighbor algorithm (NNA) and support vector machine (SVM) was better than random forests (RF) in the training cohort. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of NNA were 0.872 (95% CI: 0.750-0.994), 0.967, and 0.778, respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of SVM were 0.861 (95%CI: 0.732-0.991), 1.000, and 0.722, respectively. There had no significant difference between AUCs in the test cohort. CONCLUSION: A combination of texture features and machine learning-based analysis of ADC maps could predict PCa GG upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy non-invasively with satisfactory predictive efficacy.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/7890009/2522d74dd3dd/fonc-10-604266-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/7890009/fe7a9c14029f/fonc-10-604266-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/7890009/2e982915ba92/fonc-10-604266-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/7890009/2c2ef4ef3795/fonc-10-604266-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/7890009/01922ed5e8c0/fonc-10-604266-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/7890009/2522d74dd3dd/fonc-10-604266-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/7890009/fe7a9c14029f/fonc-10-604266-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/7890009/2e982915ba92/fonc-10-604266-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/7890009/2c2ef4ef3795/fonc-10-604266-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/7890009/01922ed5e8c0/fonc-10-604266-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b0f/7890009/2522d74dd3dd/fonc-10-604266-g005.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Prediction of Pathological Upgrading at Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Texture Features and Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps.

Front Oncol. 2021-2-4

[2]
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Pathological Upgrade From Combined Transperineal Systematic and MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy to Final Pathology: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Front Oncol. 2022-4-7

[3]
Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016-4

[4]
Radiomics Models Based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps for the Prediction of High-Grade Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison With Preoperative Biopsy.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021-12

[5]
Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models.

Cancer Manag Res. 2020-12-22

[6]
A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.

BJU Int. 2020-4-1

[7]
Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern.

World J Urol. 2022-11

[8]
Radiomics Based on MRI as a Biomarker to Guide Therapy by Predicting Upgrading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020-10

[9]
ADC Metrics From Multiparametric MRI: Histologic Downgrading of Gleason Score 9 or 10 Prostate Cancers Diagnosed at Nontargeted Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018-7-11

[10]
Downgrading of grade group 2 intermediate-risk prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: Comparison of outcomes and predictors to identify potential candidates for active surveillance.

Cancer. 2020-2-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Multiparametric MRI to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading and Downgrading at Radical Prostatectomy Compared to Presurgical Biopsy.

Korean J Radiol. 2025-5

[2]
Machine learning prediction of Gleason grade group upgrade between in-bore biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.

Sci Rep. 2024-3-11

[3]
A nomogram based on ultrasound radiomics for predicting the invasiveness of cN0 single papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Gland Surg. 2023-12-26

[4]
MRI Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Models for Ki67 Expression and Gleason Grade Group Prediction in Prostate Cancer.

Cancers (Basel). 2023-9-13

[5]
Delta radiomic patterns on serial bi-parametric MRI are associated with pathologic upgrading in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: preliminary findings.

Front Oncol. 2023-9-5

[6]
What benefit can be obtained from magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis with artificial intelligence in prostate cancer compared with clinical assessments?

Mil Med Res. 2023-6-26

[7]
Beyond diagnosis: is there a role for radiomics in prostate cancer management?

Eur Radiol Exp. 2023-3-13

[8]
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Pathological Upgrade From Combined Transperineal Systematic and MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy to Final Pathology: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Front Oncol. 2022-4-7

[9]
The Dilemma of Misclassification Rates in Senior Patients With Prostate Cancer, Who Were Treated With Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Patient Counseling and Diagnostics.

Front Surg. 2022-2-16

[10]
Quality in MR reporting of the prostate – improving acquisition, the role of AI and future perspectives.

Br J Radiol. 2022-3-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Predicting clinically significant prostate cancer from quantitative image features including compressed sensing radial MRI of prostate perfusion using machine learning: comparison with PI-RADS v2 assessment scores.

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020-4

[2]
Radiomics Based on MRI as a Biomarker to Guide Therapy by Predicting Upgrading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020-10

[3]
Active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

BJU Int. 2020-1-16

[4]
Prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness with a combination of radiomics and machine learning-based analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Clin Radiol. 2019-9-5

[5]
Machine learning methods can more efficiently predict prostate cancer compared with prostate-specific antigen density and prostate-specific antigen velocity.

Prostate Int. 2019-9

[6]
Risk stratification and avoiding overtreatment in localized prostate cancer.

Curr Opin Urol. 2019-11

[7]
Correlations between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Gleason Score in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Eur Urol Oncol. 2020-8

[8]
Machine learning applications in prostate cancer magnetic resonance imaging.

Eur Radiol Exp. 2019-8-7

[9]
Machine learning classifiers can predict Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer with greater accuracy than experienced radiologists.

Eur Radiol. 2019-6-11

[10]
Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019-5-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索