Prediction of Pathological Upgrading at Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Texture Features and Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a combination of texture features and machine learning-based analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for the prediction of Grade Group (GG) upgrading in Gleason score (GS) ≤6 prostate cancer (PCa) (GG1) and GS 3 + 4 PCa (GG2).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine patients who were biopsy-proven to have GG1 or GG2 and underwent MRI examination with the same MRI scanner prior to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systemic biopsy were included. All these patients received radical prostatectomy to confirm the final GG. Patients were divided into training cohort and test cohort. 94 texture features were extracted from ADC maps for each patient. The independent sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to identify the texture features with statistically significant differences between GG upgrading group and GG non-upgrading group. Texture features of GG1 and GG2 were compared based on the final pathology of radical prostatectomy. We used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm to filter features. Four supervised machine learning methods were employed. The prediction performance of each model was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The statistical comparison between AUCs was performed.

RESULTS

Six texture features were selected for the machine learning models building. These texture features were significantly different between GG upgrading group and GG non-upgrading group ( < 0.05). The six features had no significant difference between GG1 and GG2 based on the final pathology of radical prostatectomy. All machine learning methods had satisfactory predictive efficacy. The diagnostic performance of nearest neighbor algorithm (NNA) and support vector machine (SVM) was better than random forests (RF) in the training cohort. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of NNA were 0.872 (95% CI: 0.750-0.994), 0.967, and 0.778, respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of SVM were 0.861 (95%CI: 0.732-0.991), 1.000, and 0.722, respectively. There had no significant difference between AUCs in the test cohort.

CONCLUSION

A combination of texture features and machine learning-based analysis of ADC maps could predict PCa GG upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy non-invasively with satisfactory predictive efficacy.