Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 3;9:623904. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.623904. eCollection 2021.
Since February 2020, when coronavirus disease began to spread in Italy, general practitioners (GPs) were called to manage a growing number of health situations. The challenges experienced by Italian GPs remained unrevealed. This study aimed at exploring Italian GPs' care experiences and practices associated with critical incidents during the first wave of the pandemic. A qualitative study design involving the critical incident technique through an online survey was applied. Sociodemographic data and open-ended responses were collected. While participants' characteristics were analyzed through descriptive statistics, qualitative data were thematically analyzed employing the framework method. 149 GPs responded to the survey and 99 participants completed the survey (dropout rate = 33%). Eight themes emerged indicating factors related to the organization of the healthcare system and factors related to the clinical management of patients, that were perceived as impacting on the GPs' care provision. The analysis revealed difficulties in communicating with other local services. This, together with the lack of coordination among services, was reported as a major challenge. Primary care was perceived as having been undervalued and criticalities in the organization of GP courses, led in a bureaucratic fashion, posed at risk some trainees to be infected. The digital technologies adopted for remote patient consultations were seen as useful tools for daily practice helping the GPs to stay emotionally connected with their patients. Besides, the improvement in the GP-patient relationship in terms of solidarity between patients and doctors and compliance to rules, had a positive impact. Moreover, many respondents addressed the importance of professional collaboration and teamwork, in terms of both support in practical issues (to find PPE, diagnostics and guidelines) and emotional support. At the same time, the lack of resources (e.g., PPE, swabs) and of specific guidelines and protocols impacted on the care provision. Our findings suggest that GPs in Italy are at risk of being left behind within the epidemic management. Communication and coordination among services are essential and should be substantially improved, and primary care research should be initiated to collect the context-specific evidence necessary to enhance the system's preparedness to public health emergencies and the quality of primary care services.
自 2020 年 2 月冠状病毒病开始在意大利传播以来,全科医生(GP)被要求管理越来越多的健康状况。意大利全科医生所面临的挑战仍未被揭示。本研究旨在探讨意大利全科医生在大流行第一波期间与危急事件相关的护理经验和做法。采用在线调查的关键性事件技术进行了定性研究设计。收集了社会人口统计学数据和开放式回答。虽然通过描述性统计分析了参与者的特征,但通过框架方法对定性数据进行了主题分析。149 名全科医生对调查做出了回应,99 名参与者完成了调查(辍学率=33%)。出现了 8 个主题,表明与医疗保健系统组织有关的因素和与患者临床管理有关的因素,这些因素被认为影响了全科医生的护理提供。分析显示,与其他当地服务部门沟通存在困难。这种情况以及服务之间缺乏协调,被认为是一个主要挑战。初级保健被认为被低估了,而 GP 课程的组织缺乏协调,以官僚主义的方式进行,使一些受训者面临感染风险。为远程患者咨询而采用的数字技术被视为日常实践的有用工具,有助于全科医生与患者保持情感联系。此外,GP-患者关系的改善,体现在患者和医生之间的团结以及对规则的遵守上,产生了积极的影响。此外,许多受访者提到了专业合作和团队合作的重要性,无论是在实际问题(寻找个人防护设备、诊断和指南)还是情感支持方面。与此同时,资源(例如,个人防护设备、拭子)和具体指南和协议的缺乏,影响了护理的提供。我们的研究结果表明,意大利的全科医生在疫情管理中面临被忽视的风险。服务之间的沟通和协调至关重要,应得到实质性改善,应启动初级保健研究,以收集特定于背景的证据,以增强系统应对公共卫生突发事件的准备和初级保健服务的质量。