Suppr超能文献

通用粘结系统不同应用技术对大块充填复合树脂与乳牙和恒牙牙本质微拉伸粘结强度的影响。

Effect of Different Application Techniques of Universal Bonding System on Microtensile Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill Composites to Primary and Permanent Dentin.

作者信息

Ghajari Masoud Fallahinejad, Sheikholeslamian Mahsa, Ghasemi Amir, Simaei Leila

机构信息

Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Front Dent. 2020 Jan;17(2):1-8. doi: 10.18502/fid.v17i1.3962. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a bulk-fill composite to permanent and primary coronal dentin using a universal adhesive in self-etch and total-etch modes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This in-vitro study was performed on 52 occlusal dentinal surfaces of human primary and permanent teeth. The crowns were cut to the gingival level. The 48 prepared dentin sections were randomly assigned to the following groups (n=13): A: Primary/Total-etch, B: Primary/Self-etch, C: Permanent/Total-etch, and D: Permanent/Self-etch. In groups A and C, after etching for 15 seconds, two layers of a universal bonding (Futurabond U) were applied and cured for 10 seconds. All samples were filled with a bulk-fill composite (x-trafil; VOCO) and cured for 40 seconds. The samples were cut to a bar-shaped dentin block with the dimensions of 1×1×1 mm, and after 10,000 thermocycles, the μTBS test was accomplished at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of μTBS were calculated, and the data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The mean μTBS was as follows: A: 15.03±2.0279, B: 11.11±2.4423, C: 23.50±4.8165, and D: 16.26±6.3200 MPa. Futurabond U showed a higher μTBS in the total-etch mode (P<0.001). The permanent teeth had greater μTBS than the primary teeth (P<0.001). Similar percentages of failure modes were observed in the total-etch groups but in the self-etch groups, most failures were in the form of adhesive and mixed.

CONCLUSION

Greater μTBS was observed in the permanent teeth with the total-etch technique.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用通用型粘结剂,在自酸蚀和全酸蚀模式下,测定大块充填复合树脂与恒牙和乳牙牙冠牙本质之间的微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)。

材料与方法

本体外研究在52颗人恒牙和乳牙的咬合面牙本质表面上进行。将牙冠切割至牙龈水平。将48个制备好的牙本质切片随机分为以下几组(n = 13):A组:乳牙/全酸蚀,B组:乳牙/自酸蚀,C组:恒牙/全酸蚀,D组:恒牙/自酸蚀。在A组和C组中,酸蚀15秒后,涂抹两层通用型粘结剂(Futurabond U)并固化10秒。所有样本均用大块充填复合树脂(x-trafil;VOCO)充填并固化40秒。将样本切割成尺寸为1×1×1 mm的棒状牙本质块,经过10000次热循环后,以1 mm/分钟的十字头速度进行μTBS测试。计算μTBS的平均值和标准差(SD),并使用双向方差分析(ANOVA)和Fisher精确检验对数据进行分析。

结果

μTBS的平均值如下:A组:15.03±2.0279,B组:11.11±2.4423,C组:23.50±4.8165,D组:16.26±6.3200 MPa。Futurabond U在全酸蚀模式下显示出更高的μTBS(P<0.001)。恒牙的μTBS高于乳牙(P<0.001)。在全酸蚀组中观察到相似的失败模式百分比,但在自酸蚀组中,大多数失败表现为粘结性和混合型。

结论

在恒牙中,全酸蚀技术观察到更高的μTBS。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验