• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西版饮食失调症筛选测试(DOS)用于检测饮食强迫症:在营养师和营养专业大学生中进行跨文化调适和验证。

The Brazilian version of the DOS for the detection of orthorexia nervosa: transcultural adaptation and validation among dietitians and Nutrition college students.

机构信息

Nutrition and Health Postgraduate, School of Nursing, University Federal of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Coordination of Food and Nutrition, Ministry of Health, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

出版信息

Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Dec;26(8):2713-2725. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01143-2. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s40519-021-01143-2
PMID:33615424
Abstract

PURPOSE

Orthorexia nervosa has been receiving considerable attention and several tools have been developed to assess it, for instance, the "Düsseldorf Orthorexie Scale" (DOS). Such scale is a validated test to measure orthorexic eating behavior and it has shown good psychometric properties. Therefore, this study aimed to transculturally adapt and validate the Brazilian version of the DOS (DOS-BR).

METHODS

DOS-BR was obtained using the back-translation process after two reviews done by a focus group and after running a pilot-test (n = 64). A self-report questionnaire was administered to a sample of Brazilian dietitians and Nutrition college students (n = 486). To examine the factor structure of the DOS-BR, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted. The ordinal alpha was examined. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a sub-sample (n = 159). Convergent validity was assessed by conducting correlation analyses between the DOS-BR and other theoretically related tools (EAT-26 and OCI-R) within the sub-sample.

RESULTS

A three-factor structure was revealed for the DOS-BR properly fitted (KMO = 0.787). The test showed good internal consistency with an ordinal alpha of 0.795, and it also had excellent test-retest reliability of 0.776. DOS-BR median score was 17 (14-22) in Measurement 1 and 19 (17-22) in Measurement 2. The total score had a positive and moderate correlation with eating disorders symptoms (0.488) and a positive and weak correlation with obsessive-compulsive symptoms (0.224).

CONCLUSION

The DOS-BR was culturally and psychometrically adequate for the samples of Brazilian Nutrition-related subjects. The tool is indicated as a reliable alternative to evaluate orthorexia nervosa in Brazilian scenery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Descriptive (cross-sectional) study, Level V.

摘要

目的

神经强迫症已受到广泛关注,并且已经开发了几种工具来评估它,例如“杜塞尔多夫神经强迫症量表”(DOS)。该量表是一种经过验证的测试,可以衡量神经强迫症的饮食行为,并且具有良好的心理测量特性。因此,本研究旨在对巴西版 DOS(DOS-BR)进行跨文化适应性和验证。

方法

DOS-BR 通过由焦点小组进行的两次审查和进行试点测试(n=64)之后的回译过程获得。向巴西营养师和营养专业大学生样本(n=486)发放了一份自我报告问卷。为了检验 DOS-BR 的因子结构,进行了探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析。检验了有序 alpha 值。在子样本(n=159)中评估了重测信度。在子样本中,通过进行 DOS-BR 与其他理论相关工具(EAT-26 和 OCI-R)之间的相关分析,评估了收敛效度。

结果

DOS-BR 呈现出适当拟合的三因子结构(KMO=0.787)。该测试具有良好的内部一致性,有序 alpha 值为 0.795,重测信度也非常出色,为 0.776。DOS-BR 的中位数得分为 17(14-22)在测量 1 和 19(17-22)在测量 2。总分与饮食失调症状呈正相关(0.488),与强迫症状呈正相关(0.224)。

结论

DOS-BR 对巴西营养相关主题的样本具有文化和心理测量上的充分性。该工具可作为评估巴西神经强迫症的可靠替代方法。

证据水平

描述性(横断面)研究,等级 V。

相似文献

1
The Brazilian version of the DOS for the detection of orthorexia nervosa: transcultural adaptation and validation among dietitians and Nutrition college students.巴西版饮食失调症筛选测试(DOS)用于检测饮食强迫症:在营养师和营养专业大学生中进行跨文化调适和验证。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Dec;26(8):2713-2725. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01143-2. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
2
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale: prevalence and demographic correlates of orthorexia nervosa among Chinese university students.中文版杜塞尔多夫饮食失调量表的心理测量特性:中国大学生饮食失调症的患病率及人口统计学相关性。
Eat Weight Disord. 2019 Jun;24(3):453-463. doi: 10.1007/s40519-019-00656-1. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
3
Italian adaptation of the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (I-DOS): psychometric properties and prevalence of orthorexia nervosa among an Italian sample.意大利版杜塞尔多夫饮食强迫症量表(I-DOS):在意大利样本中饮食强迫症的心理测量学特性和患病率。
Eat Weight Disord. 2022 May;27(4):1405-1413. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01278-2. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the English version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexie Scale (DOS) and the prevalence of orthorexia nervosa among a U.S. student sample.杜塞尔多夫健康饮食强迫症量表(DOS)英文版的心理测量评估及美国学生样本中健康饮食强迫症的患病率
Eat Weight Disord. 2019 Apr;24(2):275-281. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0570-6. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the French version of the Düsseldorfer Orthorexia Skala (DOS) and prevalence of orthorexia nervosa among university students.对法语版杜塞尔多夫饮食强迫症量表(DOS)的心理测量学评估以及大学生饮食强迫症的患病率。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Dec;26(8):2589-2596. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01123-6. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
6
Any overlap between orthorexia nervosa and obsessive-compulsive disorder in Lebanese adults? Results of a cross-sectional study and validation of the 12-item and 4-item obsessive-compulsive inventory (OCI-12 and OCI-4).黎巴嫩成年人的饮食强迫症与强迫症之间有重叠吗?横断面研究的结果和 12 项和 4 项强迫性量表(OCI-12 和 OCI-4)的验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04119-3.
7
The Polish version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (PL-DOS) and its comparison with the English version of the DOS (E-DOS).《杜塞尔多夫正食症量表》波兰语版(PL-DOS)及其与英文版(E-DOS)的比较。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 May;26(4):1223-1232. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-01025-z. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
8
Relationship between disgust and orthorexia nervosa and psychometric properties of the Italian Dusseldorf orthorexia scale in a general population sample.一般人群样本中厌恶感与神经性正食症的关系以及意大利版杜塞尔多夫正食症量表的心理测量特性
J Eat Disord. 2023 Oct 3;11(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00899-5.
9
Validation of the Arabic version of the Dusseldorf Orthorexia Scale (DOS) among Lebanese adolescents.黎巴嫩青少年中杜塞尔多夫正食症量表(DOS)阿拉伯语版本的验证
J Eat Disord. 2021 Oct 16;9(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00488-4.
10
Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the DOS questionnaire for the detection of orthorexic nervosa behavior.适应和验证西班牙语版 DOS 问卷用于检测饮食强迫症行为。
PLoS One. 2019 May 7;14(5):e0216583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216583. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Orthorexia nervosa in dietitians and dietetics students-prevalence, risk factors, and interventions: a scoping review using a systematic approach.营养师和营养学专业学生中的orthorexia nervosa——患病率、风险因素及干预措施:一项采用系统方法的范围综述
Nutr Rev. 2025 Feb 1;83(2):382-396. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae009.
2
Maternal Bonding as a Protective Factor for Orthorexia Nervosa Risk in Dietetics Students.母婴联系作为饮食失调症风险的保护因素。
Nutrients. 2023 Aug 14;15(16):3577. doi: 10.3390/nu15163577.
3
Nutrition knowledge, diet quality and orthorexic behaviors in Polish students-a pre-post repeated cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
To further understand orthorexia nervosa: DOS validity for the Portuguese population and its relationship with psychological indicators, sex, BMI and dietary pattern.为了进一步了解饮食失调强迫症:DOS 在葡萄牙人群中的有效性及其与心理指标、性别、BMI 和饮食模式的关系。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Oct;26(7):2127-2134. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-01058-4. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
2
The Polish version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (PL-DOS) and its comparison with the English version of the DOS (E-DOS).《杜塞尔多夫正食症量表》波兰语版(PL-DOS)及其与英文版(E-DOS)的比较。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 May;26(4):1223-1232. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-01025-z. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
波兰学生的营养知识、饮食质量和饮食强迫症行为:一项前后重复的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0287165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287165. eCollection 2023.
The psychometric properties of Orthorexia Nervosa assessment scales: A systematic review and reliability generalization.
饮食强迫症评估量表的心理计量学特性:系统评价和可靠性综合。
Appetite. 2020 Dec 1;155:104797. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104797. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
4
Orthorexia nervosa: A review of psychosocial risk factors.神经性食欲失调症:心理社会风险因素综述。
Appetite. 2019 Sep 1;140:50-75. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 7.
5
Orthorexia nervosa: A behavioral complex or a psychological condition?饮食强迫症:一种行为复杂还是一种心理状况?
J Behav Addict. 2018 Dec 1;7(4):1143-1156. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.129. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
6
Definition and diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa: a narrative review of the literature.神经性正食症的定义与诊断标准:文献综述
Eat Weight Disord. 2019 Apr;24(2):209-246. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0606-y. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the English version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexie Scale (DOS) and the prevalence of orthorexia nervosa among a U.S. student sample.杜塞尔多夫健康饮食强迫症量表(DOS)英文版的心理测量评估及美国学生样本中健康饮食强迫症的患病率
Eat Weight Disord. 2019 Apr;24(2):275-281. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0570-6. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
8
Is the prevalence of orthorexia nervosa in an Australian university population 6.5%?澳大利亚大学生群体中正食癖的患病率是6.5%吗?
Eat Weight Disord. 2018 Aug;23(4):453-458. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0535-9. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
9
Measuring Orthorexia Nervosa: Psychometric Limitations of the ORTO-15.测量正食症:ORTO-15量表的心理测量局限性。
Span J Psychol. 2017 Sep 20;20:E41. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2017.36.
10
Orthorexic eating behaviour as a coping strategy in patients with anorexia nervosa.正食癖饮食行为作为神经性厌食症患者的一种应对策略。
Eat Weight Disord. 2017 Jun;22(2):269-276. doi: 10.1007/s40519-016-0329-x. Epub 2016 Oct 24.