University of Padova , Padova, Italy.
Catholic University Sacro Cuore , Milano, Italy.
Am J Clin Hypn. 2021 Jan;63(3):202-216. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2020.1797623.
Scarce literature has been dedicated to the psychological treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, there have been some encouraging findings, such as in hypnosis-based studies, which revealed patient improvements in anxiety, depression and quality of life (QoL). We replicated such a design of a pragmatic study on empathy-based supportive counseling treatment in four weekly domiciliary sessions. Twenty-one people with ALS (pALS) consecutively attending the Motor Neuron Disease Center of Padova University were recruited to the study; in total, 21 pALS who did not undergo any kind of psychological treatment served as the control group. In the treatment group, depression, anxiety and QoL (measured respectively with the HADS-D, HADS-A and ALSSQOL-R) were assessed at pre- and post-treatment levels and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Statistical mixed-model regression analyses revealed that in the treated group, perceived conditions of anxiety, depression and QoL were significantly stable compared to worsening in the control patients. Interestingly, there were improvements in the QoL domains "Interaction", "Emotion" and "Physical" at the 6-month follow-up. Overall, even if not directly comparable, our current results on support-based counseling, though interesting, seem not to reach the efficacy of a hypnosis-based study in which the observed dimensions were significantly improved with respect to the baseline. The implications of our results from a psychodynamic perspective are highlighted.
关于肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的心理治疗,相关文献较为匮乏。然而,一些基于催眠的研究发现了一些令人鼓舞的结果,例如患者的焦虑、抑郁和生活质量(QoL)得到了改善。我们复制了一项基于同理心的支持性咨询治疗的实用研究设计,共进行了 4 周的家庭治疗。我们连续招募了 21 名在帕多瓦大学运动神经元疾病中心就诊的肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者(pALS);共有 21 名未接受任何心理治疗的 pALS 作为对照组。在治疗组中,在治疗前后以及 3 个月和 6 个月的随访中,分别使用 HADS-D、HADS-A 和 ALSSQOL-R 评估抑郁、焦虑和 QoL。统计混合模型回归分析显示,与对照组相比,治疗组患者的焦虑、抑郁和 QoL 状况明显稳定。有趣的是,在 6 个月的随访中,“互动”、“情绪”和“身体”等 QoL 领域得到了改善。总体而言,尽管我们目前的支持性咨询结果很有趣,但与基于催眠的研究相比,虽然无法直接比较,但似乎并未达到观察到的维度相对于基线显著改善的效果。从心理动力学的角度强调了我们研究结果的意义。