Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚地区和偏远地区的国家癌症控制指标是否满足患者体验?一项对因治疗而旅行的癌症幸存者的横断面研究。

Are National Cancer Control Indicators for patient experiences being met in regional and remote Australia? A cross-sectional study of cancer survivors who travelled for treatment.

机构信息

Cancer Council Queensland, Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):e042507. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042507.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the health services experience of patients with cancer from regional and remote Australia using the Australian National Cancer Control Indicators (NCCI) guidelines as an assessment framework.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Queensland non-for-profit cancer accommodation lodges.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were patients with cancer who travelled for treatment from rural and remote Queensland to major urban centres (n=518; age mean=64.6, SD=11.18).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Assessments included NCCI patient indicators, quality of life (QoL), psychological distress and unmet supportive care needs.

RESULTS

The frequency at which NCCI indicators were met ranged from 37.5% for receiving an assessment and care plan to 97.3% for understanding explanations about diagnosis. Geographical considerations did not impact patient experience, whereas middle school educated participants were more likely than those with senior-level education or higher to receive an assessment and care plan (OR=1.90, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.91) and to report having their views on treatment taken into account (OR=2.22, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.33). Patients with breast or prostate cancer reported better communication and patient involvement and information and services provision (=p<0.001) compared with those with skin and head and neck cancer. When compared with information and service provision, communication and patient involvement showed stronger positive associations with QoL (=2.03, p=0.042), psychosocial (=2.05, p=0.040) and patient care (=2.00, p=0.046) outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The patient care experience varies across the NCCI indicators by sociodemographic and clinical factors that likely reflect healthcare system biases. Perceptions about communication and involvement appear most critical for optimal outcomes and should be a priority action area for cancer control.

摘要

目的

根据澳大利亚国家癌症控制指标(NCCI)指南,从区域和偏远地区澳大利亚癌症患者的健康服务体验进行评估。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

昆士兰非营利性癌症住宿旅馆。

参与者

参与者是从昆士兰农村和偏远地区前往主要城市中心接受治疗的癌症患者(n=518;年龄平均值=64.6,标准差=11.18)。

结果测量

评估包括 NCCI 患者指标、生活质量(QoL)、心理困扰和未满足的支持性护理需求。

结果

满足 NCCI 指标的频率从接受评估和护理计划的 37.5%到理解诊断解释的 97.3%不等。地理因素对患者体验没有影响,而接受过中学教育的参与者比接受过高级教育或更高教育的参与者更有可能接受评估和护理计划(OR=1.90,95%CI 1.23-2.91),并报告将他们对治疗的看法考虑在内(OR=2.22,95%CI 1.49-3.33)。与皮肤和头颈部癌症患者相比,患有乳腺癌或前列腺癌的患者报告沟通和患者参与度更好,以及信息和服务提供更好(=p<0.001)。与信息和服务提供相比,沟通和患者参与与 QoL(=2.03,p=0.042)、心理社会(=2.05,p=0.040)和患者护理(=2.00,p=0.046)的结果有更强的正相关关系。

结论

NCCI 指标的患者护理体验因社会人口和临床因素而异,这些因素可能反映了医疗保健系统的偏见。对沟通和参与的看法似乎对最佳结果最为关键,应成为癌症控制的优先行动领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7903096/f6152a6f1cc2/bmjopen-2020-042507f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验