• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雅培BinaxNOW快速抗原检测在马萨诸塞州一个高通量免下车社区检测点的性能与实施评估

Performance and Implementation Evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test in a High-Throughput Drive-Through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts.

作者信息

Pollock Nira R, Jacobs Jesica R, Tran Kristine, Cranston Amber E, Smith Sita, O'Kane Claire Y, Roady Tyler J, Moran Anne, Scarry Alison, Carroll Melissa, Volinsky Leila, Perez Gloria, Patel Pinal, Gabriel Stacey, Lennon Niall J, Madoff Lawrence C, Brown Catherine, Smole Sandra C

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00083-21.

DOI:10.1128/JCM.00083-21
PMID:33622768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8091851/
Abstract

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (Ag) that can be performed at point of care (POC) can supplement molecular testing and help mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. Deployment of an Ag RDT requires an understanding of its operational and performance characteristics under real-world conditions and in relevant subpopulations. We evaluated the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag card in a high-throughput, drive-through, free community testing site in Massachusetts using anterior nasal (AN) swab reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) for clinical testing. Individuals presenting for molecular testing in two of seven lanes were offered the opportunity to also receive BinaxNOW testing. Dual AN swabs were collected from symptomatic and asymptomatic children (≤18 years of age) and adults. BinaxNOW testing was performed in a testing pod with temperature/humidity monitoring. One individual performed testing and official result reporting for each test, but most tests had a second independent reading to assess interoperator agreement. Positive BinaxNOW results were scored as faint, medium, or strong. Positive BinaxNOW results were reported to patients by phone, and they were instructed to isolate pending RT-PCR results. The paired RT-PCR result was the reference for sensitivity and specificity calculations. Of 2,482 participants, 1,380 adults and 928 children had paired RT-PCR/BinaxNOW results and complete symptom data. In this study, 974/1,380 (71%) adults and 829/928 (89%) children were asymptomatic. BinaxNOW had 96.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.0 to 99.3) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI, 98.6 to 100.0) specificity in adults within 7 days of symptoms and 84.6% (95% CI, 65.1 to 95.6) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI, 94.5 to 100.0) specificity in children within 7 days of symptoms. Sensitivity and specificity in asymptomatic adults were 70.2% (95% CI, 56.6 to 81.6) and 99.6% (95% CI, 98.9 to 99.9), respectively, and in asymptomatic children, they were 65.4% (95% CI, 55.6 to 74.4) and 99.0% (95% CI, 98.0 to 99.6), respectively. By cycle threshold ( ) value cutoff, sensitivity in all subgroups combined ( = 292 RT-PCR-positive individuals) was 99.3% with values of ≤25, 95.8% with values of ≤30, and 81.2% with values of ≤35. Twelve false-positive BinaxNOW results (out of 2,308 tests) were observed; in all 12, the test bands were faint but otherwise normal and were noted by both readers. One invalid BinaxNOW result was identified. Interoperator agreement (positive versus negative BinaxNOW result) was 100% ( = 2,230/2,230 double reads). Each operator was able to process 20 RDTs per hour. In a separate set of 30 specimens (from individuals with symptoms ≤7 days) run at temperatures below the manufacturer's recommended range (46 to 58.5°F), sensitivity was 66.7% and specificity 95.2%. BinaxNOW had very high specificity in both adults and children and very high sensitivity in newly symptomatic adults. Overall, 95.8% sensitivity was observed with values of ≤30. These data support public health recommendations for use of the BinaxNOW test in adults with symptoms for ≤7 days without RT-PCR confirmation. Excellent interoperator agreement indicates that an individual can perform and read the BinaxNOW test alone. A skilled laboratorian can perform and read 20 tests per hour. Careful attention to temperature is critical.

摘要

用于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗原(Ag)的快速诊断测试(RDT)可在护理点(POC)进行,能够补充分子检测并有助于缓解2019冠状病毒病大流行。部署抗原快速诊断测试需要了解其在实际条件下和相关亚人群中的操作及性能特征。我们在马萨诸塞州一个高通量、免下车的免费社区检测点,使用前鼻(AN)拭子逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)进行临床检测,对雅培BinaxNOW 2019冠状病毒病抗原检测卡进行了评估。在七个检测通道中的两个通道进行分子检测的个体,也有机会接受BinaxNOW检测。对有症状和无症状的儿童(≤18岁)及成人采集双份前鼻拭子。BinaxNOW检测在一个有温度/湿度监测的检测舱内进行。每次检测由一人进行检测及报告正式结果,但大多数检测有第二次独立判读以评估不同操作人员之间的一致性。BinaxNOW检测呈阳性的结果分为弱阳性、中等阳性或强阳性。BinaxNOW检测呈阳性的结果通过电话告知患者,并指示他们在等待RT-PCR结果期间进行隔离。配对的RT-PCR结果作为敏感性和特异性计算的参考。在2482名参与者中,1380名成人和928名儿童有配对的RT-PCR/BinaxNOW结果及完整的症状数据。在本研究中,974/1380(71%)的成人和829/928(89%)的儿童无症状。BinaxNOW在症状出现7天内的成人中的敏感性为96.5%(95%置信区间[CI],90.0至99.3),特异性为100%(95%CI,98.6至100.0);在症状出现7天内的儿童中的敏感性为84.6%(95%CI,65.1至95.6),特异性为100%(95%CI,94.5至100.0)。无症状成人的敏感性和特异性分别为70.2%(95%CI,56.6至81.6)和99.6%(95%CI,98.9至99.9),无症状儿童的敏感性和特异性分别为65.4%(95%CI,55.6至74.4)和99.0%(95%CI,98.0至99.6)。根据循环阈值( )值截断,所有亚组合并( = 292例RT-PCR阳性个体)时,当 值≤25时敏感性为99.3%,当 值≤30时敏感性为95.8%,当 值≤35时敏感性为81.2%。观察到12例假阳性BinaxNOW结果(在2308次检测中);在所有12例中,检测条带为弱阳性但其他方面正常,两位判读者均有记录。识别出1例无效的BinaxNOW结果。不同操作人员之间的一致性(BinaxNOW检测结果阳性与阴性)为100%( = 2230/2230次双份判读)。每个操作人员每小时能够处理20次快速诊断测试。在另一组30份标本(来自症状出现≤7天的个体)中,在低于制造商推荐范围(46至58.5°F)的温度下进行检测,敏感性为66.7%,特异性为95.2%。BinaxNOW在成人和儿童中均具有非常高的特异性,在新出现症状的成人中具有非常高的敏感性。总体而言,当 值≤30时观察到敏感性为95.8%。这些数据支持在无RT-PCR确认的情况下,对症状出现≤7天的成人使用BinaxNOW检测的公共卫生建议。出色的不同操作人员之间一致性表明一个人可以单独进行和判读BinaxNOW检测。一名熟练的检验人员每小时能够进行并判读20次检测。仔细注意温度至关重要。

相似文献

1
Performance and Implementation Evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test in a High-Throughput Drive-Through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts.雅培BinaxNOW快速抗原检测在马萨诸塞州一个高通量免下车社区检测点的性能与实施评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00083-21.
2
Performance and Operational Evaluation of the Access Bio CareStart Rapid Antigen Test in a High-Throughput Drive-Through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州一个高通量免下车社区检测点的Access Bio CareStart快速抗原检测的性能和操作评估
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 May 26;8(7):ofab243. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab243. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原和基于分子的检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2.
4
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction and BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Tests at a Community Site During an Omicron Surge : A Cross-Sectional Study.在奥密克戎疫情期间社区检测点比较 SARS-CoV-2 逆转录酶聚合酶链反应和 BinaxNOW 快速抗原检测:一项横断面研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 May;175(5):682-690. doi: 10.7326/M22-0202. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
5
Implementation and Accuracy of BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen COVID-19 Test in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Populations in a High-Volume Self-Referred Testing Site.高流量自我转诊检测点中无症状和有症状人群中 BinaxNOW 快速抗原 COVID-19 检测的实施和准确性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0100821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01008-21. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
6
Evaluation of the INDICAID COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test in Symptomatic Populations and Asymptomatic Community Testing.评估 INDICAID COVID-19 快速抗原检测在有症状人群和无症状社区检测中的应用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0034221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00342-21. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
7
Evaluation of Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test for SARS-CoV-2 Infection at Two Community-Based Testing Sites - Pima County, Arizona, November 3-17, 2020.亚利桑那州皮马县 2020 年 11 月 3 日至 17 日在两个社区检测点评估 Abbott BinaxNOW 快速抗原检测对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的效果。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 22;70(3):100-105. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7003e3.
8
Performance Characteristics of the Abbott BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test in Comparison to Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR and Viral Culture in Community Testing Sites during November 2020.2020 年 11 月社区检测点中 Abbott BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测与实时逆转录聚合酶链反应和病毒培养的比较性能特征。
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Jan 19;60(1):e0174221. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01742-21. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
9
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
10
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card Test, Puerto Rico.雅培 BinaxNOW COVID-19 抗原检测卡在波多黎各的诊断准确性。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Jul;18(7):e13305. doi: 10.1111/irv.13305.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of a Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test with Real-Time PCR.一种新型冠状病毒2型快速抗原检测与实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应的比较
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol. 2024 Dec 19;6(4):298-305. doi: 10.36519/idcm.2024.421. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Performance of self-performed SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自行进行的 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 18;12:1402949. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1402949. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 compared to the viral genetic test in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较 COVID-19 快速抗原检测与成人病毒基因检测的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Oct 1;22(10):1939-2002. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00291.
4
Advancements in SARS-CoV-2 detection: Navigating the molecular landscape and diagnostic technologies.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测的进展:探索分子领域与诊断技术
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 21;10(9):e29909. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29909. eCollection 2024 May 15.
5
Screening Strategies to Reduce COVID-19 Mortality in Nursing Homes.养老院降低 COVID-19 死亡率的筛查策略。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240688. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0688.
6
Comparison of the i-test COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test with Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR.i-test新冠病毒快速抗原检测与实时逆转录聚合酶链反应的比较。
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol. 2024 Mar 8;6(1):66-69. doi: 10.36519/idcm.2024.295. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Testing for SARS-CoV-2: lessons learned and current use cases.SARS-CoV-2 检测:经验教训和当前应用案例。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Jun 13;37(2):e0007223. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00072-23. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
8
At-home testing for respiratory viruses: a minireview of the current landscape.家庭呼吸道病毒检测:当前现状简述。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 May 8;62(5):e0031223. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00312-23. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
9
COVID-19 passenger screening to reduce travel risk and translocation of disease.新冠病毒肺炎旅客筛查以降低旅行风险和疾病传播。
Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Feb 8;152:e36. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824000220.
10
The New Normal: Delayed Peak SARS-CoV-2 Viral Loads Relative to Symptom Onset and Implications for COVID-19 Testing Programs.新常态:与症状出现相比,SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量延迟达到峰值,对 COVID-19 检测计划的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 17;78(2):301-307. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad582.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study.七种商业化 SARS-CoV-2 快速即时检测抗原试剂盒的比较:一项单中心实验室评估研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Jul;2(7):e311-e319. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00056-2. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
2
Clinical Evaluation of Roche SD Biosensor Rapid Antigen Test for SARS-CoV-2 in Municipal Health Service Testing Site, the Netherlands.罗氏 SD 生物传感器快速抗原检测试剂盒用于市政卫生服务检测点的 SARS-CoV-2 临床评估,荷兰。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 May;27(5):1323-1329. doi: 10.3201/eid2705.204688. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
3
Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.唾液、咽拭子和鼻拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02881-20.
4
Antigen-Based Testing but Not Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Correlates With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Viral Culture.抗原检测与实时聚合酶链反应相关,但与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 病毒培养不相关。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2861-e2866. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1706.
5
Correlation of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Antigen and RNA Concentrations in Nasopharyngeal Samples from Children and Adults Using an Ultrasensitive and Quantitative Antigen Assay.使用超灵敏定量抗原检测法对儿童和成人鼻咽样本中SARS-CoV-2核衣壳抗原与RNA浓度的相关性研究
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Mar 19;59(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.03077-20.
6
Performance Characteristics of a Rapid Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Antigen Detection Assay at a Public Plaza Testing Site in San Francisco.旧金山广场检测点快速严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 抗原检测的性能特征。
J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 8;223(7):1139-1144. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa802.
7
Head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with self-collected nasal swab professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab.SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测快速检测与自采鼻拭子和专业采集鼻咽拭子的头对头比较。
Eur Respir J. 2021 Apr 15;57(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.03961-2020. Print 2021 Apr.
8
Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres.基层医疗机构中一种用于 COVID-19 诊断的快速抗原检测试剂(Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device)的现场评估。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):472.e7-472.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
9
The Challenges of Expanding Rapid Tests to Curb COVID-19.扩大快速检测以遏制新冠疫情面临的挑战
JAMA. 2020 Nov 10;324(18):1813-1815. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.21106.
10
Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020.2020 年 1 月至 5 月期间,英国 COVID-19 病例的传染性持续时间及其与 RT-PCR 循环阈值的相关性。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Aug;25(32). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.32.2001483.