COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Laboratory Leadership Service, Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Jan 19;60(1):e0174221. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01742-21. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
Point-of-care antigen tests are an important tool for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Antigen tests are less sensitive than real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR). Data on the performance of the BinaxNOW antigen test compared to rRT-PCR and viral culture by symptom and known exposure status, timing during disease, or exposure period and demographic variables are limited. During 3 to 17 November 2020, we collected paired upper respiratory swab specimens to test for SARS-CoV-2 by rRT-PCR and Abbott BinaxNOW antigen test at two community testing sites in Pima County, Arizona. We administered a questionnaire to capture symptoms, known exposure status, and previous SARS-CoV-2 test results. Specimens positive by either test were analyzed by viral culture. Previously we showed overall BinaxNOW sensitivity was 52.5%. Here, we showed BinaxNOW sensitivity increased to 65.7% among currently symptomatic individuals reporting a known exposure. BinaxNOW sensitivity was lower among participants with a known exposure and previously symptomatic (32.4%) or never symptomatic (47.1%) within 14 days of testing. Sensitivity was 71.1% in participants within a week of symptom onset. In participants with a known exposure, sensitivity was highest 8 to 10 days postexposure (75%). The positive predictive value for recovery of virus in cell culture was 56.7% for BinaxNOW-positive and 35.4% for rRT-PCR-positive specimens. Result reporting time was 2.5 h for BinaxNOW and 26 h for rRT-PCR. Point-of-care antigen tests have a shorter turnaround time than laboratory-based nucleic acid amplification tests, which allows for more rapid identification of infected individuals. Antigen test sensitivity limitations are important to consider when developing a testing program.
即时检测抗原检测是 SARS-CoV-2 检测的重要工具。抗原检测的敏感性低于实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)。关于 BinaxNOW 抗原检测与 rRT-PCR 和病毒培养相比的性能数据,按症状和已知暴露状态、疾病发生期间或暴露期和人口统计学变量进行分层的数据有限。在 2020 年 11 月 3 日至 17 日期间,我们在亚利桑那州皮马县的两个社区检测点收集了配对的上呼吸道拭子样本,通过 rRT-PCR 和 Abbott BinaxNOW 抗原检测进行 SARS-CoV-2 检测。我们进行了问卷调查,以获取症状、已知暴露状态和之前的 SARS-CoV-2 检测结果。用两种检测方法均为阳性的样本进行病毒培养分析。之前我们发现总体 BinaxNOW 敏感性为 52.5%。在这里,我们发现,在报告已知暴露且目前有症状的个体中,BinaxNOW 的敏感性增加到 65.7%。在有已知暴露且在检测前 14 天内有症状(32.4%)或无症状(47.1%)的参与者中,BinaxNOW 的敏感性较低。在症状发作后一周内的参与者中,敏感性为 71.1%。在有已知暴露的参与者中,敏感性在暴露后 8 至 10 天最高(75%)。BinaxNOW 阳性和 rRT-PCR 阳性样本中病毒在细胞培养中恢复的阳性预测值分别为 56.7%和 35.4%。BinaxNOW 的报告时间为 2.5 小时,rRT-PCR 为 26 小时。即时检测抗原检测比基于实验室的核酸扩增检测具有更短的周转时间,这可以更快速地识别感染个体。在制定检测计划时,需要考虑抗原检测的敏感性限制。