• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Behavioural responses to influenza pandemics: what do we know?对流感大流行的行为反应:我们了解什么?
PLoS Curr. 2009 Sep 9;1:RRN1037. doi: 10.1371/currents.rrn1037.
2
Community Mitigation Guidelines to Prevent Pandemic Influenza - United States, 2017.《2017年美国预防大流行性流感的社区缓解指南》
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2017 Apr 21;66(1):1-34. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6601a1.
3
The 2009 pandemic in Mexico: Experience and lessons regarding national preparedness policies for seasonal and epidemic influenza.2009年墨西哥大流行:关于季节性流感和流行性感冒国家防范政策的经验与教训。
Gac Med Mex. 2017 Jan-Feb;153(1):102-110.
4
Influenza-Related Communication and Community Mitigation Strategies: Results From the 2015 Pandemic Influenza Readiness Assessment.流感相关沟通与社区缓解策略:2015年大流行性流感准备情况评估结果
Health Promot Pract. 2019 May;20(3):338-343. doi: 10.1177/1524839919826582. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
5
H1N1 Influenza Pandemic in Italy Revisited: Has the Willingness to Get Vaccinated Suffered in the Long Run?意大利甲型H1N1流感大流行再探讨:从长远来看,接种疫苗的意愿是否受到了影响?
J Public Health Res. 2015 Sep 4;4(2):559. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.559. eCollection 2015 Jul 16.
6
A Tale of Three Recent Pandemics: Influenza, HIV and SARS-CoV-2.近期三大疫情之故事:流感、艾滋病毒与新型冠状病毒2019
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jun 2;13:889643. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.889643. eCollection 2022.
7
The Socio-Cultural Factors Influencing the Level of Public Compliance with Infection Control Measures during the 1918 Influenza Pandemic in Italy: A Historical Approach.影响意大利1918年流感大流行期间公众遵守感染控制措施水平的社会文化因素:一种历史研究方法
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 20;12(6):694. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060694.
8
Anticipation and response: pandemic influenza in Malawi, 2009.预期与应对:2009年马拉维的甲型H1N1流感大流行
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1341225. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1341225.
9
[Monitoring and non pharmacologic measures during a pandemic virus (H1N1) 2009 in Spain].
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2010 Sep-Oct;84(5):497-506. doi: 10.1590/s1135-57272010000500004.
10
[Prevention and control of infectious diseases with pandemic potential: the EU-project SARSControl].[具有大流行潜力的传染病防控:欧盟项目“非典防控”]
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Jun;71(6):351-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224103. Epub 2009 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Unifying human infectious disease models and real-time awareness of population- and subpopulation-level intervention effectiveness.统一人类传染病模型以及对人群和亚人群层面干预效果的实时认知。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jun 18;12(6):241964. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241964. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Exploring the impact of shielding advice on the wellbeing of individuals identified as clinically extremely vulnerable amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation.探讨在 COVID-19 大流行期间,针对被临床认定为极脆弱的个体的屏蔽建议对其健康的影响:一项混合方法评估。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 22;22(1):2145. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14368-2.
3
Teaching and learning lifestyle medicine during COVID-19: how has living during a pandemic influenced students' understanding and attitudes to self-care and population health? A qualitative analysis.在 COVID-19 期间教授和学习生活方式医学:在大流行期间生活如何影响学生对自我保健和人群健康的理解和态度?定性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 8;22(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03590-6.
4
Motivating Protective Behavior against COVID-19: Fear Versus Hope.激励针对 COVID-19 的保护行为:恐惧与希望。
J Aging Health. 2024 Jun;36(5-6):350-366. doi: 10.1177/08982643221089427. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
5
Restaurant Diners' Switching Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protection Motivation Theory.新冠疫情期间餐厅用餐者的转换行为:保护动机理论
Front Psychol. 2022 May 27;13:833627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833627. eCollection 2022.
6
The impact of a COVID-19 lockdown on work productivity under good and poor compliance.新冠疫情封锁对高、低合规度下工作效率的影响。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;31(5):1009-1015. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab138.
7
Individually optimal choices can be collectively disastrous in COVID-19 disease control.在新冠疫情防控中,个人的最优选择可能会导致集体性灾难。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 30;21(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10829-2.
8
Health anxiety, coping mechanisms and COVID 19: An Indian community sample at week 1 of lockdown.健康焦虑、应对机制和 COVID-19:封锁第一周的印度社区样本。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 21;16(4):e0250336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250336. eCollection 2021.
9
Human responses to Covid-19: The role of optimism bias, perceived severity, and anxiety.人类对新冠病毒的反应:乐观偏差、感知严重程度和焦虑的作用。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jul;176:110781. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110781. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
10
Measuring Italian citizens' engagement in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic containment measures: A cross-sectional study.衡量意大利公民在新冠疫情第一波防控措施中的参与度:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238613. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
The signature features of influenza pandemics--implications for policy.流感大流行的标志性特征——对政策的影响
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2595-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0903906. Epub 2009 May 7.
2
[Long-term effects of the influenza pandemic of 1918: a differential gender selection].[1918年流感大流行的长期影响:性别差异选择]
Cah Sociol Demogr Med. 2008 Jul-Sep;48(3):341-54.
3
Risk factors for SARS infection within hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam.越南河内医院内严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)感染的风险因素。
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2008 Sep;61(5):388-90.
4
Knowledge and anticipated behaviour of health-care workers in response to an outbreak of pandemic influenza in Georgia.格鲁吉亚医护人员针对甲型H1N1流感大流行疫情的认知与预期行为
World Hosp Health Serv. 2008;44(2):24-6.
5
Likely impact of school and childcare closures on public health workforce during an influenza pandemic: a survey.流感大流行期间学校和托儿所关闭对公共卫生人力的可能影响:一项调查
Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2008 Jun;32(2):261-2. doi: 10.33321/cdi.2008.32.26.
6
Twentieth century influenza pandemics in Singapore.20世纪新加坡的流感大流行。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2008 Jun;37(6):470-6.
7
Theodore E. Woodward award: non-pharmaceutical interventions employed by major American cities during the 1918-19 influenza pandemic.西奥多·E·伍德沃德奖:美国主要城市在1918 - 19年流感大流行期间采用的非药物干预措施
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2008;119:129-38; discussion 138-42.
8
Mitigating pandemic influenza: the ethics of implementing a school closure policy.减轻大流行性流感影响:实施学校关闭政策的伦理问题。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;14(4):372-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000324566.72533.0b.
9
Public response to community mitigation measures for pandemic influenza.公众对大流行性流感社区缓解措施的反应。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 May;14(5):778-86. doi: 10.3201/eid1405.071437.
10
Estimating the costs of school closure for mitigating an influenza pandemic.估算为缓解流感大流行而关闭学校的成本。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Apr 24;8:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-135.

对流感大流行的行为反应:我们了解什么?

Behavioural responses to influenza pandemics: what do we know?

作者信息

Balinska Marta, Rizzo Caterina

机构信息

Istituto superiore di sanita, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS Curr. 2009 Sep 9;1:RRN1037. doi: 10.1371/currents.rrn1037.

DOI:10.1371/currents.rrn1037
PMID:20025201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2762764/
Abstract

The emergence of the novel A/H1N1 virus has made pandemic preparedness a crucial issue for public health worldwide. Although the epidemiological aspects of the three 20th century influenza pandemics have been widely investigated, little is known about population behaviour in a pandemic situation. Such knowledge is however critical, notably for predicting population compliance with non pharmaceutical interventions. This paper reviews the relevant scientific literature for the 1918-1920, 1957-1958, 1969-1969 influenza epidemics and the 2003 SARS outbreak. Although the evidence base of most non pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and personal protection measures is debated, it appears on the basis of past experience that NPIs implemented the most systematically, the earliest, and for the longest time could reduce overall mortality rates and spread out epidemic peaks. Adequate, transparent, and targeted communication on the part of public health authorities would be also of crucial importance in the event of a serious influenza pandemic.

摘要

新型甲型H1N1病毒的出现使全球大流行防范成为公共卫生领域的关键问题。尽管对20世纪三次流感大流行的流行病学情况已进行了广泛研究,但对于大流行情况下的人群行为却知之甚少。然而,此类知识至关重要,特别是对于预测人群对非药物干预措施的依从性而言。本文回顾了1918 - 1920年、1957 - 1958年、1969 - 1969年流感疫情以及2003年非典疫情的相关科学文献。尽管大多数非药物干预措施(NPIs)和个人防护措施的证据基础存在争议,但根据以往经验,最系统、最早且最长时间实施的非药物干预措施似乎可以降低总体死亡率并分散疫情高峰。在发生严重流感大流行时,公共卫生当局进行充分、透明且有针对性的沟通也将至关重要。