• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士数字能力问卷的心理测量学验证

Psychometric Validation of the Digital Competence Questionnaire for Nurses.

作者信息

Golz Christoph, Hahn Sabine, Zwakhalen Sandra M G

机构信息

School of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Oct 1;10:23779608241272641. doi: 10.1177/23779608241272641. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/23779608241272641
PMID:39484227
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11526274/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

No brief questionnaire comprising knowledge, skills, and attitudes is available to measure digital competence among clinical practice nurses.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the structural validity and internal consistency of the Digital Competence Questionnaire (DCQ) for Clinical Practice Nurses.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with English-speaking clinical practice nurses. Twenty-six items from an initial item pool, developed in a prior conducted Delphi Study, were included. Exploratory factor analysis for structural validity with "oblimin" rotation and a two-factor solution as well as internal consistency test using Cronbach's alpha were conducted.

RESULTS

Data from 185 nurses was obtained. The final questionnaire comprised of 12 items allocated to two factors: knowledge & skills and attitude. Factor "attitude" explained 33% of the variance and factor "knowledge & skills" 24%, resulting in a cumulative explanation of the variance of 57% by both factors. Internal consistency per factor was satisfactory, with 0.81 and 0.91, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The DCQ for clinical practice nurses is valid and has satisfactory internal consistency. Researchers and nurse managers can use it to assess the level of digital competence among clinical practice nurses. Future psychometric validation of the DCQ for clinical practice nurses is required to allow a conclusion on the goodness of fit and reliability.

摘要

引言

目前尚无包含知识、技能和态度的简短问卷来衡量临床实践护士的数字能力。

目的

旨在评估临床实践护士数字能力问卷(DCQ)的结构效度和内部一致性。

方法

对讲英语的临床实践护士进行了一项横断面研究。纳入了先前德尔菲研究中初步项目库中的26个项目。采用“斜交旋转”和双因素解决方案进行探索性因素分析以评估结构效度,并使用克朗巴哈系数进行内部一致性检验。

结果

获得了185名护士的数据。最终问卷由12个项目组成,分为两个因素:知识与技能和态度。“态度”因素解释了33%的方差,“知识与技能”因素解释了24%的方差,两个因素对方差的累积解释率为57%。每个因素的内部一致性都令人满意,分别为0.81和0.91。

结论

临床实践护士数字能力问卷有效且具有令人满意的内部一致性。研究人员和护士管理人员可使用它来评估临床实践护士的数字能力水平。未来需要对临床实践护士数字能力问卷进行心理测量学验证,以便得出关于拟合优度和可靠性的结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ddd/11526274/868590bbe826/10.1177_23779608241272641-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ddd/11526274/3824e2434ad8/10.1177_23779608241272641-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ddd/11526274/868590bbe826/10.1177_23779608241272641-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ddd/11526274/3824e2434ad8/10.1177_23779608241272641-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ddd/11526274/868590bbe826/10.1177_23779608241272641-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric Validation of the Digital Competence Questionnaire for Nurses.护士数字能力问卷的心理测量学验证
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Oct 1;10:23779608241272641. doi: 10.1177/23779608241272641. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Content Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure Digital Competence of Nurses in Clinical Practice.一份用于衡量护士临床实践中数字能力的问卷的内容效度验证。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Dec 1;41(12):949-956. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001037.
3
Development and psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire on nurses' clinical competence eye care in intensive care unit patients.开发并心理计量评估了一份关于 ICU 患者眼科护理的护士临床能力问卷。
Nurs Crit Care. 2017 May;22(3):169-175. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12113. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
4
Nurses' knowledge, skills and personal attributes for competent health education practice: An instrument development and psychometric validation study.护士进行健康教育实践所需的知识、技能和个人特质:工具的开发和心理测量验证研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Feb;77(2):715-728. doi: 10.1111/jan.14632. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
5
Core Competence in Fundamental Nursing Practicum Scale: A validity and reliability analysis.基础护理实践核心能力量表:效度和信度分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Jul;62:103352. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103352. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Gratitude at Work Scale in Employed Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.工作感恩量表中文版在在职护士中的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
J Nurs Res. 2024 Aug 1;32(4):e336. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000620.
7
The biosafety incident response competence scale for clinical nursing staff: a development and validation study.临床护理人员生物安全事件应对能力量表的编制与验证研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 14;23(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01848-6.
8
The Internal Reliability and Construct Validity of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ): Evidence from Healthcare Professionals in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.基于证据的实践问卷(EBPQ)的内部信度和结构效度:来自东地中海地区医疗保健专业人员的证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;11(15):2168. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152168.
9
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.
10
The Development and Psychometric Testing on Psychiatric Nurses of a Nurse Case Management Competence Scale in Taiwan.台湾地区精神科护理人员个案管理能力量表的编制与心理计量学测试。
J Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;26(2):72-79. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000230.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploration of the Application Rules and Clinical Significance of Acupoints in Acupuncture Treatment of Migraine Based on Data Mining [Response to Letter].基于数据挖掘的穴位在偏头痛针灸治疗中的应用规律及临床意义探索[对信件的回复]
J Pain Res. 2025 Jul 10;18:3541-3542. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S551020. eCollection 2025.
2
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Digital Competence Questionnaire for clinical nurses.临床护士数字能力问卷中文版的翻译及心理测量学评估
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 10;11:20552076251332987. doi: 10.1177/20552076251332987. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Content Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure Digital Competence of Nurses in Clinical Practice.一份用于衡量护士临床实践中数字能力的问卷的内容效度验证。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Dec 1;41(12):949-956. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001037.
2
Technostress and Digital Competence Among Health Professionals in Swiss Psychiatric Hospitals: Cross-sectional Study.瑞士精神病医院医护人员的技术压力与数字能力:横断面研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Nov 4;8(11):e31408. doi: 10.2196/31408.
3
Approaches for defining and assessing nursing informatics competencies: a scoping review.
定义和评估护理信息学能力的方法:范围综述。
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Apr;19(4):794-841. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00100.
4
Work-related stress among health professionals in Swiss acute care and rehabilitation hospitals-A cross-sectional study.瑞士急性护理和康复医院卫生专业人员的工作相关压力:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Aug;29(15-16):3064-3081. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15340. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
5
Is Facebook a viable recruitment tool?脸书(Facebook)是一种可行的招聘工具吗?
Nurse Res. 2020 Jun 17;28(2):9-13. doi: 10.7748/nr.2019.e1682. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
6
Healthcare staff digital literacy levels and their attitudes towards information systems.医护人员数字素养水平及其对信息系统的态度。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Mar;26(1):592-612. doi: 10.1177/1460458219839613. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
7
Healthcare professionals' competence in digitalisation: A systematic review.医护人员的数字化能力:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Mar;28(5-6):745-761. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14710. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
8
Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: a systematic review.定义、症状与技术压力风险:系统综述。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 Jan;92(1):13-35. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1352-1. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
9
Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform - TIGER.技术信息指导教育改革——TIGER
Methods Inf Med. 2018 Jun;57(S 01):e30-e42. doi: 10.3414/ME17-01-0155. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Canadian Nurse Informatics Competency Assessment Scale.加拿大护士信息学能力评估量表的心理测量特性。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2018 Jul;36(7):359-365. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000437.