Suppr超能文献

活体供者评估工具(LDAT):土耳其的有效性和可靠性研究。

Live Donor Assessment Tool (LDAT): A Turkish validity and reliability study.

机构信息

Division of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Psychiatry, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2020 Dec;31(12):917-922. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2020.19980.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Psychosocial and psychiatric evaluations are crucial components of the assessment of a live donor candidate. The Live Donor Assessment Tool (LDAT) was developed for this purpose. This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of LDAT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

132 live kidney or liver donor were referred to assess their psychosocial/psychiatric appropriateness for donation and were randomized for clinical evaluation as usual or with LDAT. The internal consistency of LDAT was measured by Chronbach's alpha coefficient. Inter-rater reliability was measured by using Spearman's correlation coefficient. The potential validity of LDAT was assessed by comparing LDAT scores to clinical decisions. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare LDAT scores across two clinically classified groups (acceptable/declined). Logistic regression was performed using LDAT scores to predict the clinical decision.

RESULTS

The Turkish version of LDAT items demonstrate good internal consistency (α=0.773). Inter-rater reliability of LDAT demonstrated strong correlation (ICC=0.72). LDAT scores differentiated the accepted/declined groups, and strongly predicted the clinical decision. With a cut-off score of 60.5, LDAT was found to have high sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of LDAT was found to be a valid and reliable tool. LDAT could be an appropriate tool to assess live donor candidates.

摘要

背景/目的:心理社会和精神评估是评估活体供体候选人的重要组成部分。为此目的开发了活体供体评估工具(LDAT)。本研究旨在评估 LDAT 土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。

材料和方法

132 名活体肾脏或肝脏供体被转介进行心理社会/精神适宜性评估,并随机分为临床评估常规组或 LDAT 组。LDAT 的内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha 系数进行测量。通过使用 Spearman 相关系数测量评分者间信度。通过将 LDAT 评分与临床决策进行比较来评估 LDAT 的潜在有效性。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较两个临床分类组(可接受/拒绝)的 LDAT 评分。使用 LDAT 评分进行逻辑回归以预测临床决策。

结果

LDAT 土耳其语版本的项目显示出良好的内部一致性(α=0.773)。LDAT 的评分者间信度显示出强烈的相关性(ICC=0.72)。LDAT 评分区分了可接受/拒绝的组,并且强烈预测了临床决策。当截断分数为 60.5 时,LDAT 具有高灵敏度和特异性。

结论

LDAT 土耳其语版本被发现是一种有效且可靠的工具。LDAT 可以成为评估活体供体候选人的合适工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验