• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Intensive Care Psychological Assessment Tool (IPAT): Turkish validity and reliability study.重症监护心理评估工具(IPAT):土耳其的有效性和可靠性研究。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Aug 8;49(4):1236-1242. doi: 10.3906/sag-1812-164.
2
Detecting acute distress and risk of future psychological morbidity in critically ill patients: validation of the intensive care psychological assessment tool.检测重症患者的急性应激及未来发生心理疾病的风险:重症监护心理评估工具的验证
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 24;18(5):519. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0519-8.
3
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire. caregiver 自我评估问卷土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3250-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587525. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
4
The validity and reliability of the Antenatal Perceived Stress Inventory Turkish version: A methodological study.产前感知压力量表土耳其语版的效度与信度:一项方法学研究。
Health Care Women Int. 2018 Oct;39(10):1140-1157. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2018.1469635. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
5
Turkish adaptation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score and its validity and reliability.盆腔器官脱垂症状评分的土耳其语改编版及其有效性和可靠性。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Aug;28(8):1217-1222. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3251-x. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
6
Moral distress in Turkish intensive care nurses.土耳其重症监护护士的道德困扰
Nurs Ethics. 2017 Mar;24(2):209-224. doi: 10.1177/0969733015593408. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
7
The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the bipolar depression rating scale.双相情感障碍抑郁评定量表土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;55(6):1448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.020. Epub 2014 May 4.
8
Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale.烧伤特异性疼痛焦虑量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度
J Burn Care Res. 2019 Oct 16;40(6):818-822. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz091.
9
Validation of the Chinese version of the resilience scale and its cutoff score for detecting low resilience in Chinese cancer patients.中文版本的韧性量表及其用于检测中国癌症患者低韧性的截断分数的验证。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 May;21(5):1497-502. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1699-x. Epub 2012 Dec 30.
10
Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of Olerud-Molander Ankle Score in Patients With Malleolar Fracture.奥勒鲁德-莫兰德踝关节评分土耳其语版本在踝关节骨折患者中的效度和信度
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Nov-Dec;56(6):1209-1212. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
[Cross-cultural adaptation to Spanish of the Signs of Depression Scale (SODS) to the early assessment of mood in patients admitted to a Stroke Unit].[用于卒中单元住院患者情绪早期评估的抑郁症状量表(SODS)的西班牙语跨文化适应性研究]
Rev Neurol. 2022 Mar 16;74(6):175-180. doi: 10.33588/rn.7406.2021420.

本文引用的文献

1
Detecting acute distress and risk of future psychological morbidity in critically ill patients: validation of the intensive care psychological assessment tool.检测重症患者的急性应激及未来发生心理疾病的风险:重症监护心理评估工具的验证
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 24;18(5):519. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0519-8.
2
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)
Codas. 2013;25(2):191-2. doi: 10.1590/s2317-17822013000200017.
3
Depression, anxiety and alcohol abuse in a gastroenterology intensive care unit: prevalence and detection.胃肠病学重症监护病房中的抑郁、焦虑及酒精滥用:患病率与检测情况
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2010 Jul 8;6:47-52. doi: 10.2174/1745017901006010047.
4
Psychiatric disorders and the ICU: gaps and opportunities.
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Dec;34(12):2136-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1261-y. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
5
Recognition of depression by non-psychiatric physicians--a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.非精神科医生对抑郁症的识别——一项系统的文献综述和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23(1):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0428-5. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
6
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the Child Uncertainty in Illness Scale among children with chronic illness.慢性病患儿疾病不确定性儿童量表的探索性与验证性因素分析
J Pediatr Psychol. 2007 Apr;32(3):288-96. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsl021. Epub 2006 Jul 13.
7
The intensive care experience: development of the ICE questionnaire.重症监护体验:ICE问卷的编制
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Jul;47(1):64-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03066.x.
8
Critical care nursing practice regarding patient anxiety assessment and management.危重症护理实践中关于患者焦虑评估与管理的内容。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2003 Oct;19(5):276-88. doi: 10.1016/s0964-3397(03)00061-2.
9
Prevalence, detection and treatment of anxiety, depression, and delirium in the adult critical care unit.成人重症监护病房中焦虑、抑郁和谵妄的患病率、检测与治疗
Psychosomatics. 2001 Sep-Oct;42(5):391-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.42.5.391.
10
Survival, morbidity, and quality of life after discharge from intensive care.重症监护病房出院后的生存、发病率及生活质量
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2293-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200007000-00018.

重症监护心理评估工具(IPAT):土耳其的有效性和可靠性研究。

Intensive Care Psychological Assessment Tool (IPAT): Turkish validity and reliability study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Division of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital,University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey

出版信息

Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Aug 8;49(4):1236-1242. doi: 10.3906/sag-1812-164.

DOI:10.3906/sag-1812-164
PMID:31408296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7018335/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: It is of crucial importantance to be able to detect acute psychological distress in patients. The Intensive Care Psychological Assessment Tool (IPAT) was developed for this purpose in intensive care units. This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of IPAT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 98 patients were included. To assess concurrent validity, the Intensive Care Experiences Scale (ICES) and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale were performed. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to estimate internal consistency. Interitem and item-total score correlations were also performed. Sensitivity and specificity were derived for concurrent anxiety and depression.

RESULTS

The internal reliability was good. Cronbach’s a = 0.85. Items were well-correlated, with an average interitem correlation of 0.38. The concurrent validity of IPAT was good. Correlation between IPAT scores, anxiety, depression, ICES, and the diagnosis of delirium were as follows, respectively: r = 0.61, P < 0.01, r = 0.54, P < 0.01, r = −0.66, P < 0.01, r = 0.37, P < 0.01. With a cutoff score of ≥ 6, IPAT showed 85% sensitivity and 61% specificity to detect concurrent anxiety, and 74% sensitivity and 82% specificity to detect concurrent depression [AUC = 0.77 (95% CI, 0.68–0.87) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76–0.92), respectively].

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of IPAT was found to be a valid and reliable tool to assess acute psychological distress among patients in intensive care units.

摘要

背景/目的:能够检测患者的急性心理困扰至关重要。为此,在重症监护病房开发了重症监护心理评估工具(IPAT)。本研究旨在评估 IPAT 的土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。

材料和方法

共纳入 98 例患者。为了评估同时效度,进行了重症监护体验量表(ICES)和医院焦虑抑郁量表评估。采用克朗巴赫 α 系数评估内部一致性。还进行了条目间和条目总分相关性分析。得出了同时焦虑和抑郁的敏感性和特异性。

结果

内部可靠性良好。克朗巴赫 α = 0.85。条目相关性良好,平均条目间相关性为 0.38。IPAT 的同时效度良好。IPAT 评分与焦虑、抑郁、ICES 和谵妄诊断之间的相关性分别为:r = 0.61,P < 0.01,r = 0.54,P < 0.01,r = −0.66,P < 0.01,r = 0.37,P < 0.01。截断值为≥6 时,IPAT 检测同时焦虑的敏感性为 85%,特异性为 61%,检测同时抑郁的敏感性为 74%,特异性为 82%[AUC = 0.77(95%CI,0.68–0.87)和 0.84(95%CI,0.76–0.92)]。

结论

土耳其语版 IPAT 是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于评估重症监护病房患者的急性心理困扰。