Goyal Hemant, Kopel Jonathan, Perisetti Abhilash, Mann Rupinder, Ali Aman, Tharian Benjamin, Saligram Shreyas, Inamdar Sumant
The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, 501 South Washington Avenue, Scranton, PA 18505, USA.
Department of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan 24;14:2631774520984627. doi: 10.1177/2631774520984627. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Obesity remains a growing public health epidemic that has increased healthcare costs and related comorbidities. Current treatment guidelines encourage a multidisciplinary approach starting from patient selection, interventions, and long-term follow-up to maintain weight loss. However, these conservative interventions are largely ineffective at reducing body weight due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. Recently, endoscopic bariatric therapies have become an attractive alternative to traditional invasive bariatric surgeries due to their improved efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Endoscopic bariatric therapies include intragastric balloon placement, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, gastric bypass revision, and aspiration therapy. These procedures fall into two separate categories depending on the primary mechanism involved: restrictive or malabsorptive. Restrictive methods, such as the Orbera and ReShape™ intragastric balloons, increase satiation and delay gastric emptying while decreasing the amount of food that can be ingested. In contrast, malabsorptive devices, such as the EndoBarrier, interfere with the small intestine's ability to absorb food while restoring normal gastrointestinal hormone levels regulating satiation. Together, these techniques provide useful alternatives for patients in whom pharmacological or lifestyle modifications have proven ineffective. Despite these advantages, the long-term effects of these procedures on metabolic changes remain to be studied. Furthermore, the management of complications from these procedures continues to evolve. In this review, we aim to elaborate on the clinical indications and efficacy of the endobariatric procedures, together with various types of available endoscopic bariatric therapy procedures.
肥胖仍然是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,增加了医疗成本和相关合并症。当前的治疗指南鼓励采用多学科方法,从患者选择、干预措施到长期随访,以维持体重减轻。然而,由于对治疗方案的依从性较低,这些保守干预措施在减轻体重方面大多无效。最近,内镜减肥疗法因其疗效提高、安全性好和成本效益高,已成为传统侵入性减肥手术的一种有吸引力的替代方法。内镜减肥疗法包括胃内球囊置入术、内镜袖状胃成形术、胃旁路修复术和抽吸疗法。根据所涉及的主要机制,这些手术可分为两类:限制型或吸收不良型。限制型方法,如奥贝拉和重塑™ 胃内球囊,可增加饱腹感,延迟胃排空,同时减少可摄入的食物量。相比之下,吸收不良型装置,如内屏障,会干扰小肠吸收食物的能力,同时恢复调节饱腹感的正常胃肠激素水平。总之,这些技术为药物治疗或生活方式改变已被证明无效的患者提供了有用的替代方案。尽管有这些优点,但这些手术对代谢变化的长期影响仍有待研究。此外,这些手术并发症的管理仍在不断发展。在这篇综述中,我们旨在详细阐述内镜减肥手术的临床适应症和疗效,以及各种可用的内镜减肥治疗手术。