Benedetti I, Spinelli D, Callegari T, Bonometti R, Molinaro E, Novara E, Cassinari M, Frino C, Guaschino R, Boverio R, Lauritano E C
Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Feb;25(3):1743-1751. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202102_24885.
This study evaluated the ability of mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) to identify disease severity in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in comparison to conventional inflammatory biomarkers and clinical scores.
In an observational trial, COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients were enrolled. MR-proADM, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and lactic acid (LA) were measured in all patients at admission (T0), at 24 hours (T1) and in the third (T3) and fifth day (T5) of hospitalization. The aims of this study were to determine the role of MR-proADM to detect patients with high risk of mortality and compare the prognostic value of MR-proADM with commonly used clinical scores (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score - SOFA score, Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II score - APACHE II score, and Simplified Acute Physiological score II - SAPS II score).
Twenty-one COVID-19 ARDS patients admitted to the Intermediate Care Unit (IMCU) were enrolled. The median MR-proADM values were 2.28, 2.41, 1.96 and 1.89 nmol/L at T0, T1, T3 and T5, respectively. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 52.4%. Mean MR-proADM T0 value was significantly higher in non-survivors compared with survivors (3.5 vs. 1.1 nmol/L, p < 0.05). No significant differences were found for the other inflammatory biomarkers. In terms of the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), MR-proADM showed a similar discriminatory power compared with APACHE II, SOFA and SAPS II score (0.81, 0.91, 0.70 and 0.78, respectively). The optimal MR-proADM cut-point cut-off point was 1.07 nmol/L, which corresponds to a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 71%.
MR-proADM, in addition to the clinical scores, could be useful to predict outcome in COVID-19 ARDS patients.
本研究评估了中段肾上腺髓质素原(MR-proADM)与传统炎症生物标志物及临床评分相比,在识别2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者疾病严重程度方面的能力。
在一项观察性试验中,纳入了COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者。在所有患者入院时(T0)、24小时(T1)、住院第三天(T3)和第五天(T5)测量MR-proADM、C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)和乳酸(LA)。本研究的目的是确定MR-proADM在检测高死亡风险患者中的作用,并将MR-proADM的预后价值与常用临床评分(序贯器官衰竭评估评分 - SOFA评分、急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II评分 - APACHE II评分以及简化急性生理评分II - SAPS II评分)进行比较。
21名入住中级护理病房(IMCU)的COVID-19 ARDS患者被纳入研究。T0、T1、T3和T5时MR-proADM的中位数分别为2.28、2.41、1.96和1.89 nmol/L。30天全因死亡率为52.4%。非幸存者的MR-proADM T0平均水平显著高于幸存者(3.5对1.1 nmol/L,p < 0.05)。其他炎症生物标志物未发现显著差异。在受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积方面,MR-proADM与APACHE II、SOFA和SAPS II评分相比显示出相似的鉴别能力(分别为0.81、0.91、0.70和0.78)。MR-proADM的最佳切点为1.07 nmol/L,对应灵敏度为91%,特异性为71%。
除临床评分外,MR-proADM可能有助于预测COVID-19 ARDS患者的预后。