Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Maryland at College Park.
Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA.
J Sex Res. 2021 May-Jun;58(5):638-647. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.1886228. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
Homophobia is associated with sexual risk among sexual minorities, including Black sexual minority men, though experienced homophobia may differ across sexual identities. We conducted latent class analysis of sexual identities and experienced homophobia associated with sexual risk, and tested mediators of this association. We used longitudinal data from the HIV Prevention Trials Network Study 061 (n = 1,553). We generated rate ratios between baseline latent classes of experienced homophobia and sexual identity and 12-month outcomes: Condomless receptive anal intercourse (CRAI), number of partners, and transactional sex. Mediators included 6-month internalized homophobia, depression, social support, and substance use. We selected the following 7-class model: "Bisexual, rare homophobia" (reference), "Mixed identities, mixed homophobia", "Bisexual, frequent homophobia", "Heterosexual/Same-gender loving, frequent homophobia", "Gay, frequent homophobia", " Gay/Same-gender loving, frequent homophobia," and "Gay, rare homophobia." All other classes had greater CRAI than the reference. For bisexual/mixed/heterosexual classes, approximately 20% of this association was positively mediated through our mediators ( < .05). The Heterosexual/Same-gender loving class had the largest proportion mediated through internalized homophobia. For gay-identifying classes, mediation was marginally significant (.05 < < .10). Classes of sexual identity and experienced homophobia were associated with CRAI among Black sexual minority men, partially mediated through internalized homophobia, depression, social support, and substance use.
恐同与性少数群体的性风险相关,包括黑人男同性恋者,但性少数群体经历的恐同可能因性身份而异。我们对性身份和经历的恐同与性风险之间的关系进行了潜在类别分析,并检验了这种关系的中介因素。我们使用了 HIV 预防试验网络研究 061(n=1553)的纵向数据。我们生成了基线经历的恐同和性身份与 12 个月结果之间的比率比:无保护的接受性肛交(CRAI)、性伴侣数量和交易性性行为。中介因素包括 6 个月的内化恐同、抑郁、社会支持和物质使用。我们选择了以下 7 类模型:“双性恋,罕见的恐同”(参照)、“混合身份,混合的恐同”、“双性恋,频繁的恐同”、“异性恋/同性爱人,频繁的恐同”、“同性恋,频繁的恐同”、“同性恋/同性爱人,频繁的恐同”和“同性恋,罕见的恐同”。所有其他类别都比参照有更高的 CRAI。对于双性恋/混合/异性恋群体,大约 20%的关联通过我们的中介因素呈正相关(<0.05)。异性恋/同性爱人群体通过内化恐同的比例最大。对于同性恋身份群体,中介作用具有边缘显著性(0.05< <0.10)。性身份和经历的恐同类别与黑人男同性恋者的 CRAI 相关,部分通过内化的恐同、抑郁、社会支持和物质使用来介导。