Suppr超能文献

女性生殖器整形手术(FGCS):对 YouTube 视频的评估。

Female genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS): Evaluation of YouTube videos.

机构信息

Near East University Medical Faculty, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Near East Boulevard, 99138, Nicosia, Cyprus.

出版信息

J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Apr;50(4):102102. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102102. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of our study is to evaluate the information available on YouTube regarding FGCS procedures in terms of content, accuracy, reliability and quality.

METHODS

Videos were listed on YouTube on 01.10.2020 by searching the terms "plastic surgery for female genital", "vaginoplasty", "labiaplasty" and selecting their relevance from the filtering options. Among these listed videos, the 50 most watched videos were listed and recorded excluding commercials, repeating videos, those shorter than 60s and non-English ones. The videos were scored by two researchers using DISCERN and JAMA scales. The DISCERN scale varies between 0-75 points and according to the scores obtained from the scale, videos are classified as 63-75: (excellent); as 51-62: (good); as 39-50: (moderate) as 28- 38: poor and as <28 very poor. JAMA scale is a scale that evaluates the accuracy, usefulness and reliability of video sources between 0-4. Insufficient data on 1 point video source obtained from the scale, refers to. 2-3 (partially sufficient data) and 4: (completely sufficient data).

RESULTS

The evaluation on DISCERN scores given to the videos revealed that the average DISCERN score of the first researcher was 45.65±13.271 and the average of the second researcher's DISCERN score was 44.65±14.235. The average of JAMA scores was 2.67±0.826 for the first researcher and 2.49±0.845 for the second researcher. Accordingly, a statistically significant linear relationship was found between DISCERN (r=0.812) scores and JAMA (r=0.622) scores by the researchers.

CONCLUSION

We found that YouTube has the potential to provide patients with easy access to a large amount of information on FGCS, although almost all of the videos we included in the study were uploaded by health professionals, the overall quality of the content on the subject was moderate. We strongly suggest that any videos on health should be uploaded by experts and these videos should definitely be reviewed by a referee.

摘要

目的

我们的研究旨在评估 YouTube 上关于 FGCS 手术的信息在内容、准确性、可靠性和质量方面的情况。

方法

我们于 2020 年 10 月 1 日在 YouTube 上搜索“女性生殖器整形”“阴道成形术”“阴唇整形术”等术语,并通过过滤选项选择相关内容,列出了视频。在这些列出的视频中,我们列出并记录了前 50 个观看次数最多的视频,排除了广告、重复视频、少于 60 秒的视频和非英语视频。两位研究人员使用 DISCERN 和 JAMA 量表对视频进行评分。DISCERN 量表的分值范围为 0-75 分,根据量表得分,视频被分为以下几类:63-75 分(优秀);51-62 分(良好);39-50 分(中等);28-38 分(差);<28 分(很差)。JAMA 量表是一个评估视频来源准确性、有用性和可靠性的量表,分值范围为 0-4。量表中获得的 1 分视频来源表示“数据不足”,2-3 分表示“部分数据充足”,4 分表示“完全数据充足”。

结果

对视频的 DISCERN 评分评估显示,第一位研究人员的平均 DISCERN 得分为 45.65±13.271,第二位研究人员的平均 DISCERN 得分为 44.65±14.235。第一位研究人员的 JAMA 平均得分为 2.67±0.826,第二位研究人员的 JAMA 平均得分为 2.49±0.845。因此,研究人员发现,DISCERN(r=0.812)评分和 JAMA(r=0.622)评分之间存在统计学上显著的线性关系。

结论

我们发现,YouTube 有可能为患者提供便捷的途径,获取大量关于 FGCS 的信息,尽管我们纳入研究的所有视频几乎都是由医疗保健专业人员上传的,但关于该主题的内容整体质量中等。我们强烈建议,任何关于健康的视频都应由专家上传,并且这些视频肯定需要经过评审。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验