Nakagawa-Kogan H, Garber A, Jarrett M, Egan K J, Hendershot S
Department of Psychosocial Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
Res Nurs Health. 1988 Apr;11(2):105-15. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770110206.
The purpose of this study was to determine which borderline hypertension subjects could succeed in self-regulating blood pressure, and to distinguish the psychologic and physiologic variables that predicted success. Thirty-four white, male, unmedicated, borderline hypertensive subjects participated in a 14-session biofeedback/cognitive self-management training program. Of these, 22 exited with diastolic pressure below 90 mm Hg; 12 exited equal to or above 90 mm Hg. Both groups exited with scores markedly lower on the Symptoms Checklist-90 (SCL-90). The successful group began and ended on all cognitive/affective subscales at a lower level than the unsuccessful group. A discriminant analysis revealed that lower scores on the SCL-90, lower systolic blood pressures, and higher heart rates during a mental task at the beginning of treatment distinguished those who succeeded in self-regulation from those who could not succeed. The possible mechanisms for blood pressure control/change as a consequence of biofeedback are discussed.
本研究的目的是确定哪些临界高血压患者能够成功实现血压自我调节,并区分预测成功的心理和生理变量。34名未接受药物治疗的白人男性临界高血压患者参加了一个为期14节的生物反馈/认知自我管理训练项目。其中,22人的舒张压降至90毫米汞柱以下;12人的舒张压等于或高于90毫米汞柱。两组患者退出时症状自评量表90(SCL-90)的得分均显著降低。成功组在所有认知/情感子量表上的起始和结束水平均低于未成功组。判别分析显示,治疗开始时SCL-90得分较低、收缩压较低以及在心理任务期间心率较高,这些因素可区分出能够成功自我调节的患者和未能成功的患者。文中还讨论了生物反馈导致血压控制/变化的可能机制。