Wang Xiaotao, Feng Xiaotian
School of Social Development, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.
School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 9;12:610482. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610482. eCollection 2021.
The One-Child Policy dramatically changed the Chinese family structure, and the literature indicates that only children may have an advantage in terms of family resource dilution. Moreover, as Chinese families traditionally prioritize investing in sons, only daughters are found to have been empowered by the policy because they did not need to compete with their brothers for parental investment. However, the literature is limited to only teenage children when they were still living in their parents' homes. It is unclear whether-when the generation of only children grew up and married-their family structure differed from that of children with siblings and whether married only daughters retained more family resources from their parents. Based on the data analysis of a 2016 survey, "Study of Youths in 12 Cities of Mainland China," including a sample of 1,007 fathers and 2,168 mothers born between 1975 and 1985, this study explores the empowerment of married only daughters, employing the theory of family resource dilution in expanded Chinese families. Using educational investment in children as an example, and with random intercept models, this study presents empirical evidence that the dilution of family resources in Chinese expanded families still benefits males and patrilineal practices. Thus, this study demonstrates that Chinese families still tend to sacrifice the interests of married daughters to ensure support for their adult sons. However, it also illustrates that married only daughters could still connect to their parents' resources, giving them a relatively dominant position for decision-making regarding the family's educational expenditure on her own children. Thus, this study extends our understanding of the family resource dilution theory to Chinese expanded families, underscoring the need for further research on Chinese only children after they marry and form families of their own.
独生子女政策极大地改变了中国的家庭结构,文献表明独生子女在家庭资源稀释方面可能具有优势。此外,由于中国家庭传统上优先投资儿子,研究发现只有女儿因该政策而获得了权力,因为她们无需与兄弟竞争父母的投资。然而,现有文献仅限于独生子女在仍与父母同住时的青少年时期。尚不清楚当独生子女一代长大结婚后,他们的家庭结构是否与有兄弟姐妹的孩子不同,以及已婚独生女是否从父母那里保留了更多家庭资源。基于对2016年一项名为“中国大陆12个城市青少年研究”的调查数据分析,该调查样本包括1975年至1985年出生的1007名父亲和2168名母亲,本研究运用大家庭中家庭资源稀释理论,探讨已婚独生女的赋权情况。以对子女的教育投资为例,并使用随机截距模型,本研究提供了实证证据,表明中国大家庭中的家庭资源稀释仍然有利于男性和父系传承。因此,本研究表明中国家庭仍然倾向于牺牲已婚女儿的利益以确保对成年儿子的支持。然而,研究还表明,已婚独生女仍可与父母的资源建立联系,这使她们在决定家庭对自己子女的教育支出方面拥有相对主导的地位。因此,本研究将我们对家庭资源稀释理论的理解扩展到了中国大家庭,强调了对中国独生子女婚后组建自己家庭后的情况进行进一步研究的必要性。