环境保健诊断：通过护理分类法进行的系统评价。
Diagnostics of care about environment: A systematic review through nursing taxonomies.
机构信息
Research Group MISKC, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Henares University Hospital, Community of Madrid Health Service, Madrid, Spain.
出版信息
Nurs Open. 2021 Sep;8(5):2272-2283. doi: 10.1002/nop2.829. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
AIM
To analyse the representation of the environment in nursing diagnostic taxonomies.
DESIGN
Systematic scoping review through nursing taxonomies.
METHODS
The first phase identified nursing diagnostic taxonomies by systematic review. The diagnoses were associated with the environment by analysis of terms into the diagnosis label and definition. Data analysis was quantitative with frequency measurements. The second phase mapped the identified diagnoses to establish equivalences using analysis by terms in the diagnostic labels. Finally, the findings obtained in the first phase were compared with the OMAHA System.
RESULTS
The bibliographic search identified 112 studies and 16 standardized languages for diagnoses. NANDA-I and ICNP were the most frequent taxonomies; ATIC, the most recent; and OMAHA, the oldest. 2,062 diagnoses from four diagnostic taxonomies were analysed, and 361 associations corresponding to 352 environmental diagnoses were identified. All taxonomies included the environment but with different weight relative to the interpersonal and geopolitical category.
目的
分析护理诊断分类法中环境的表现形式。
设计
通过护理分类法进行系统范围界定审查。
方法
第一阶段通过系统评价确定护理诊断分类法。通过分析诊断标签和定义中的术语，将诊断与环境联系起来。数据分析采用定量方法，进行频率测量。第二阶段对确定的诊断进行映射，以使用诊断标签中的术语分析建立等效关系。最后，将第一阶段的发现与 OMAHA 系统进行比较。
结果
文献检索确定了 112 项研究和 16 种标准化语言用于诊断。NANDA-I 和 ICNP 是最常见的分类法；ATIC 是最新的分类法；而 OMAHA 是最古老的分类法。从四个诊断分类法中分析了 2062 个诊断，确定了 361 个与 352 个环境诊断相对应的关联。所有分类法都包含环境，但相对于人际和地缘政治类别，其权重不同。
Zotero 插件