IPMA-Portuguese Institute for the Sea and Atmosphere, Av. Brasília, 1449-006 Lisbon, Portugal; Biology Department and CESAM, Aveiro University, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Biology Department and CESAM, Aveiro University, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 1;767:144887. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144887. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
This study aims to assess and compare the kinetics (accumulation/elimination) of the marine biotoxins okadaic acid (OA) and dinophysistoxin-1 (DTX1), between native (Ruditapes decussatus) and invasive (Ruditapes philippinarum) clam species, and their genotoxic effects and DNA recover capacity after, exposure to toxic dinoflagellates Prorocentrum lima. Clams were fed with P. lima for 5 days and then to non-toxic algae (post-exposure) during other 5 days. Toxin concentrations determined in clams by LC-MS/MS were related with DNA damage and repair assessment through the comet and base excision repair (BER) assays, respectively. Differential accumulation patterns were observed between the invasive and native species. The invasive species consistently and progressively accumulated the toxins during the first 24 h of exposure, while the native clams showed drastic variations in the toxin accumulation. Nevertheless, at the end of a 5 days of exposure period, the native clams presented higher toxin concentrations, nearly reaching the legal regulatory limit for human consumption. In addition, native clams were vastly affected by OA and DTX1, presenting an increment in the DNA damage since the first day, with a correspondent increase in the repair activity. On the other hand, invasive clams were not affected by the dinoflagellate toxins, exhibiting only some signs of the challenge, namely an increase in the DNA repair mechanisms in the post-exposure period. Invasive clams R. philippinarum are better adapted to cope with harmful algal blooms and OA-group toxins than native species. These results may increase farming interest and may lead to new introductions of the invasive clams. In sympatry sites, exposure to OA-group toxins may unbalance clams species biomass and distribution as exposure to toxic dinoflagellates affects the native clams from cellular to a population level, representing a significant threat to development and maintenance of R. decussatus populations.
本研究旨在评估和比较海洋生物毒素 okadaic 酸 (OA) 和 dinophysistoxin-1 (DTX1) 在本地 (Ruditapes decussatus) 和入侵 (Ruditapes philippinarum) 贻贝物种之间的动力学 (积累/消除),以及它们在暴露于有毒甲藻 Prorocentrum lima 后的遗传毒性效应和 DNA 恢复能力。贻贝在 5 天内用 P. lima 喂养,然后在其他 5 天内用非毒性藻类喂养 (暴露后)。通过 LC-MS/MS 测定贻贝中的毒素浓度,分别通过彗星和碱基切除修复 (BER) 测定法与 DNA 损伤和修复评估相关。在入侵和本地物种之间观察到不同的积累模式。入侵物种在暴露的前 24 小时内持续且逐渐积累毒素,而本地贻贝在毒素积累方面表现出剧烈变化。然而,在 5 天的暴露期结束时,本地贻贝呈现更高的毒素浓度,几乎达到人类消费的法定监管限制。此外,本地贻贝受到 OA 和 DTX1 的严重影响,从第一天开始 DNA 损伤增加,修复活性相应增加。另一方面,入侵贻贝不受甲藻毒素的影响,仅在暴露后表现出一些挑战的迹象,即 DNA 修复机制增加。入侵贻贝 R. philippinarum 比本地物种更能适应有害藻类大量繁殖和 OA 组毒素的影响。这些结果可能会增加养殖兴趣,并可能导致入侵贻贝的新引入。在同域地点,暴露于 OA 组毒素可能会使贻贝物种的生物量和分布失去平衡,因为暴露于有毒甲藻会影响本地贻贝从细胞到种群水平,这对 R. decussatus 种群的发展和维持构成重大威胁。