• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神障碍诊断分类的分类学和实用性。

Taxonomy and utility in the diagnostic classification of mental disorders.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.

Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2021 Sep;77(9):1921-1936. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23125. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1002/jclp.23125
PMID:33638149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8387502/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

One strategy for improving the clinical utility of mental health diagnostic systems is to better align them with how clinicians conceptualize psychopathology in practice. This approach was used in International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) development, but its underlying assumption-a link between taxonomic "fit" and clinical utility-remains untested.

METHODS

Using data from global mental health clinician samples (combined N = 5404), we investigated the association between taxonomic fit and clinical utility in mental disorder categories.

RESULTS

The overall association between fit and utility was positive (r = 0.19) but statistically not different from zero (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.06, 0.43) in this small sample (N = 39 ICD/DSM categories). However, a positive association became clear after correcting for outliers (r = 0.34 [0.05, 0.58] or higher). Further insights were apparent for specific diagnoses given their locations in the scatterplot.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest a positive link between taxonomic fit and clinical utility in mental disorder diagnoses, highlighting future research directions.

摘要

目的

提高心理健康诊断系统临床实用性的一种策略是使其与临床医生在实践中对精神病理学的概念化更好地保持一致。这一方法被用于国际疾病分类第 11 版(ICD-11)的制定,但它背后的假设——分类“契合度”与临床实用性之间的联系——仍未经检验。

方法

我们利用来自全球心理健康临床医生样本(合并 N=5404)的数据,研究了精神障碍类别中分类契合度和临床实用性之间的关联。

结果

在这个小样本(N=39 个 ICD/DSM 类别)中,整体上契合度与实用性之间存在正相关(r=0.19),但在统计学上与零无差异(95%置信区间:-0.06,0.43)。然而,在纠正离群值后,这种正相关变得明显(r=0.34 [0.05,0.58]或更高)。从散点图中特定诊断的位置可以明显看出,具体诊断的结果更为清晰。

结论

结果表明,精神障碍诊断中分类契合度与临床实用性之间存在正相关,这突出了未来的研究方向。

相似文献

1
Taxonomy and utility in the diagnostic classification of mental disorders.精神障碍诊断分类的分类学和实用性。
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Sep;77(9):1921-1936. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23125. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
2
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
3
[ICD-11: New revision and impact of this classification in psychiatry].[《国际疾病分类第11版:这一分类在精神病学中的新修订及影响》]
Encephale. 2024 Jun;50(3):329-338. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2023.10.003. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
4
Letter to the Editor: EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE ICD-11 CHAPTER ON MENTAL DISORDERS.致编辑的信:与 ICD-11 精神障碍章节相关的教育活动。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):291-292. doi: 10.5080/u26898.
5
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍:寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
6
Legal and Policy Considerations in Lebanon Related to Proposals for Paraphilic Disorders in World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases Manual, 11th Version.黎巴嫩与世界卫生组织《国际疾病分类》第 11 版有关恋物癖障碍提案相关的法律和政策考虑。
J Sex Med. 2020 Mar;17(3):491-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
7
[The revision process of diagnostic systems in psychiatry: differences between ICD-11 and DSM-5].[精神病学诊断系统的修订过程:国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)与精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)之间的差异]
Riv Psichiatr. 2020 Nov-Dec;55(6):323-330. doi: 10.1708/3503.34889.
8
Classification systems in psychiatry: diagnosis and global mental health in the era of DSM-5 and ICD-11.精神病学分类系统:DSM-5 和 ICD-11 时代的诊断和全球精神卫生。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;26(5):493-7. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283642dfd.
9
A global clinicians' map of mental disorders to improve ICD-11: analysing meta-structure to enhance clinical utility.改善《国际疾病分类第 11 版》的全球临床医生精神障碍图谱:分析元结构以提高临床实用性。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;24(6):578-90. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2012.736368.
10
Beyond the boundaries: Transitioning from categorical to dimensional paradigms in mental health diagnostics.超越界限:心理健康诊断从分类范式向维度范式的转变
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2024 Dec;33(12):1295-1301. doi: 10.17219/acem/197425.

引用本文的文献

1
Maladaptive daydreaming should be included as a dissociative disorder in psychiatric manuals: position paper.适应不良性白日梦应被纳入精神科手册中的解离性障碍:立场文件。
Br J Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;226(4):238-242. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.279. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
Conditional cash transfers and mortality in people hospitalised with psychiatric disorders: A cohort study of the Brazilian Bolsa Família Programme.有条件现金转移支付与精神疾病住院患者的死亡率:巴西家庭补助金计划的队列研究
PLoS Med. 2024 Dec 2;21(12):e1004486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004486. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
How pharmacology can aid in the diagnosis of mental disorders.药理学如何辅助精神障碍的诊断。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Feb;398(2):1099-1110. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03413-z. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
4
The harmonium model and its unified system view of psychopathology: a validation study by means of a convolutional neural network.手风琴模型及其精神病理学的统一系统观:通过卷积神经网络进行验证研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 16;12(1):21789. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26054-9.

本文引用的文献

1
An organization- and category-level comparison of diagnostic requirements for mental disorders in ICD-11 and DSM-5.《国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)与精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)中精神障碍诊断要求的组织层面和类别层面比较》
World Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;20(1):34-51. doi: 10.1002/wps.20825.
2
Diagnostic classification of irritability and oppositionality in youth: a global field study comparing ICD-11 with ICD-10 and DSM-5.儿童激惹和对立行为的诊断分类:比较 ICD-11 与 ICD-10 和 DSM-5 的全球现场研究。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;62(3):303-312. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13244. Epub 2020 May 12.
3
Evidence-based treatment of Tourette's disorder and chronic tic disorders.基于证据的妥瑞氏症和慢性抽动障碍的治疗。
Expert Rev Neurother. 2019 Nov;19(11):1103-1115. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1643236. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
4
Conduct disorder.品行障碍。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Jun 27;5(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0095-y.
5
The Development of the ICD-11 Classification of Personality Disorders: An Amalgam of Science, Pragmatism, and Politics.《ICD-11 人格障碍分类的发展:科学、实用主义与政治的融合》
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:481-502. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
6
Clinical utility of ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for high-burden mental disorders: results from mental health settings in 13 countries.国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)中高负担精神障碍诊断指南的临床实用性:来自13个国家心理健康机构的结果
World Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;17(3):306-315. doi: 10.1002/wps.20581.
7
Do mental health professionals use diagnostic classifications the way we think they do? A global survey.心理健康专业人员使用诊断分类的方式是我们所认为的那样吗?一项全球调查。
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):187-195. doi: 10.1002/wps.20525.
8
Progress in developing a classification of personality disorders for ICD-11.国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)人格障碍分类的发展进展。
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):227-229. doi: 10.1002/wps.20533.
9
Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC).理解和分类精神障碍的三种方法:ICD-11、DSM-5 和国家精神卫生研究所的研究领域标准 (RDoC)。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 Sep;18(2):72-145. doi: 10.1177/1529100617727266.
10
Adjustment disorder: A diagnosis whose time has come.适应障碍:是时候做出这个诊断了。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:243-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.034. Epub 2017 Oct 23.