Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan.
Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 20;13(9):e072926. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072926.
Knowledge of the clinical liver anatomy has evolved with advanced imaging modalities and laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, precise anatomical resection knowledge has become the standard treatment for primary and secondary liver cancer. Segmentectomy, a parenchymal-preserving approach, is regarded as an option for anatomical resections in patients with impaired liver. Indocyanine green (ICG) staining is a promising method for understanding the anatomical borders of the liver segments. There are two methods of ICG staining (positive and negative), and the superiority of either approach has not been determined to date.
This is a prospective randomised controlled superiority clinical trial performed in a single centre tertiary hospital in Japan. A comparison between the accuracy of positive and negative ICG staining in guiding laparoscopic anatomical liver resection is planned in this study. Possible candidates are patients with liver malignant tumours in whom laparoscopic monosegmentectomy or subsegmentectomy is planned. Fifty patients will be prospectively allocated into the following two groups: group A, ICG-negative staining group, and group B, ICG-positive staining group. The optimal dose of ICG for positive staining will be determined during the preparation phase. To assess the ability of the ICG fluorescence guidance in anatomical resection, the primary endpoint is the success rate of ICG staining, which consists of a SOS based on three components: superficial demarcation in the liver surface, visualisation of the parenchymal borders and consistency with the preoperative three-dimensional simulation. The secondary endpoints are the evaluation of short-term surgical outcomes and recurrence-free survival.
The study was approved by Ageo Central General Hospital Clinical Research Ethical Committee (No: 1044) and it carried out following the Declaration of Helsinki (2013 revision). Informed consent will be taken from the patients before participating. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific meetings and conferences.
UMIN000049815.
随着先进的成像方式和腹腔镜手术的发展,人们对临床肝脏解剖学的认识也在不断发展。因此,精确的解剖性肝切除术知识已成为原发性和继发性肝癌的标准治疗方法。节段切除术作为一种保留肝实质的方法,被认为是肝功能受损患者进行解剖性肝切除的一种选择。吲哚菁绿(ICG)染色是了解肝段解剖边界的一种很有前途的方法。ICG 染色有两种方法(阳性和阴性),但到目前为止,还没有确定哪种方法具有优势。
这是一项在日本一家单中心三级医院进行的前瞻性随机对照优效性临床试验。本研究计划比较 ICG 阳性和阴性染色在指导腹腔镜解剖性肝切除中的准确性。可能的候选者是计划行腹腔镜单段或亚段切除术的肝脏恶性肿瘤患者。50 名患者将前瞻性分配到以下两组:A 组,ICG 阴性染色组;B 组,ICG 阳性染色组。在准备阶段将确定 ICG 阳性染色的最佳剂量。为了评估 ICG 荧光引导在解剖性肝切除中的能力,主要终点是 ICG 染色成功率,它基于三个组成部分的 SOS:肝表面的浅层边界、实质边界的可视化和与术前三维模拟的一致性。次要终点是评估短期手术结果和无复发生存率。
该研究得到了上尾中央综合医院临床研究伦理委员会的批准(编号:1044),并按照《赫尔辛基宣言》(2013 年修订版)进行。患者在参与之前将获得知情同意。研究结果将通过同行评议的出版物、科学会议和会议进行传播。
UMIN000049815。