• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

历史城市垃圾填埋场渗滤液中的新兴关注有机污染物。

Organic contaminants of emerging concern in leachate of historic municipal landfills.

机构信息

School of Earth, Environment and Society, McMaster University, Canada.

Water Science and Technology Directorate, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canada.

出版信息

Environ Pollut. 2021 May 1;276:116474. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116474. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116474
PMID:33639486
Abstract

Many types of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), including per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), have been found in leachate of operating municipal landfills. However, there is only limited information on CECs presence in leachate of historic landfills (≥3 decades since closure, often lacking engineered liners or leachate collection systems) at concentrations that may pose a risk to nearby wells and surface water ecosystems. In this study, 48 samples of leachate-impacted groundwater were collected from 20 historic landfills in Ontario, Canada. The CECs measured included artificial sweeteners (ASs), PFAS, organophosphate esters (OPE), pharmaceuticals, bisphenols, sulfamic acid, perchlorate, and substituted phenols. The common presence of the AS saccharin, a known indicator of old landfill leachate, combined with mostly negligible levels of the AS acesulfame, an indicator of modern wastewater, revealed that most samples were strongly influenced by leachate and not cross-contaminated by wastewater (which can contain these same CECs). Several landfills, including ones closed in the 1960s, had total PFAS concentrations similar to those previously measured at modern landfills, with a maximum observed here of 12.7 μg/L. Notably elevated concentrations of several OPE, sulfamic acid, cotinine, and bisphenols A and S were found at many 30-60 year-old landfills. There was little indication of declining concentrations with landfill age, suggesting historic landfills can be long-term sources of CECs to groundwater and that certain CECs may be useful tracers for historic landfill leachate. These findings provide guidance on which CECs may require monitoring at historic landfill sites and wastewater treatment plants receiving their effluent.

摘要

许多新兴关注污染物(CECs)类型,包括全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS),已在运行中的城市垃圾填埋场的渗滤液中被发现。然而,有关历史垃圾填埋场(关闭时间超过 30 年,通常缺乏工程衬垫或渗滤液收集系统)渗滤液中 CECs 存在情况的信息有限,这些污染物的浓度可能对附近的水井和地表水生态系统构成风险。在这项研究中,从加拿大安大略省的 20 个历史垃圾填埋场采集了 48 份受渗滤液影响的地下水样本。测量的 CECs 包括人工甜味剂(ASs)、PFAS、磷酸酯(OPE)、药品、双酚、氨基磺酸、高氯酸盐和取代酚。甜味剂糖精的普遍存在,这是旧垃圾渗滤液的已知指标,再加上含量可忽略不计的乙酰磺胺酸钾,这是现代废水的指标,表明大多数样本受到渗滤液的强烈影响,而不是受到废水的交叉污染(废水中可能含有这些相同的 CECs)。包括那些在 20 世纪 60 年代关闭的垃圾填埋场在内的几个垃圾填埋场,其总 PFAS 浓度与之前在现代垃圾填埋场测量的浓度相似,这里观察到的最高浓度为 12.7μg/L。在许多 30 至 60 年的旧垃圾填埋场中,发现了几种 OPE、氨基磺酸、可替宁、双酚 A 和 S 的浓度显著升高。随着垃圾填埋场年龄的增长,浓度下降的迹象很少,这表明历史垃圾填埋场可能是地下水 CECs 的长期来源,某些 CECs 可能是历史垃圾渗滤液的有用示踪剂。这些发现为哪些 CECs 可能需要在历史垃圾填埋场和接收其废水的污水处理厂进行监测提供了指导。

相似文献

1
Organic contaminants of emerging concern in leachate of historic municipal landfills.历史城市垃圾填埋场渗滤液中的新兴关注有机污染物。
Environ Pollut. 2021 May 1;276:116474. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116474. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
2
Contaminants of emerging concern in fresh leachate from landfills in the conterminous United States.美国本土垃圾填埋场新鲜渗滤液中新兴关注污染物
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2014;16(10):2335-54. doi: 10.1039/c4em00124a.
3
Artificial sweeteners as potential tracers of municipal landfill leachate.人工甜味剂作为城市垃圾渗滤液的潜在示踪剂。
Environ Pollut. 2014 Jan;184:89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
4
Landfill leachate as a mirror of today's disposable society: Pharmaceuticals and other contaminants of emerging concern in final leachate from landfills in the conterminous United States.垃圾填埋场渗滤液:当今一次性社会的写照——美国本土垃圾填埋场最终渗滤液中的药物及其他新出现的关注污染物
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2016 Apr;35(4):906-18. doi: 10.1002/etc.3219. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
5
Identification of groundwater pollution sources in a landfill site using artificial sweeteners, multivariate analysis and transport modeling.利用人工甜味剂、多元分析和运移模拟技术对垃圾填埋场地下水污染源进行识别。
Waste Manag. 2019 Jul 15;95:116-128. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
Evaluation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in leachate, gas condensate, stormwater and groundwater at landfills.评估垃圾填埋场渗滤液、气体凝析物、雨水和地下水中的全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS)。
Chemosphere. 2023 Mar;318:137903. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137903. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
7
Non-target, suspect and target screening of chemicals of emerging concern in landfill leachates and groundwater in Guangzhou, South China.非目标、疑似目标和目标筛查华南广州垃圾渗滤液和地下水中的新兴关注化学物质。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 1;837:155705. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155705. Epub 2022 May 3.
8
Contamination of groundwater with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from legacy landfills in an urban re-development precinct.受遗留垃圾填埋场影响,城市再开发区地下水中的全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)受到污染。
Environ Pollut. 2019 May;248:101-113. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.018. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
9
Factors influencing groundwater contamination near municipal solid waste landfill sites in the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau.青藏高原城市生活垃圾填埋场附近地下水污染的影响因素。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 Mar 15;211:111913. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111913. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
10
Presence of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Landfill Adjacent Surface Waters in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州垃圾填埋场附近地表水中全氟烷基物质的存在情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 4;20(15):6524. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156524.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Distribution, Ecotoxicity, and Treatment Technologies of Emerging Contaminants in Aquatic Environments: A Recent Five-Year Review.水生环境中新兴污染物的全球分布、生态毒性及处理技术:近五年综述
Toxics. 2025 Jul 24;13(8):616. doi: 10.3390/toxics13080616.
2
Evaluation of potentially toxic elements and pharmaceutical compounds in leachate and exhaust air from non-incineration medical waste treatment devices.非焚烧医疗废物处理装置渗滤液和废气中潜在有毒元素及药物化合物的评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 21;15(1):6395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81032-7.
3
Insights into In Situ Benthic Caging Tests for Ecotoxicity Assessments Targeting Discharging Groundwater Contaminant Plumes.
针对排放地下水污染物羽流的生态毒性评估的原位底栖围栏试验的新见解。
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2024 Jul;87(1):78-93. doi: 10.1007/s00244-024-01075-9. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
4
Utilization of microbial fuel cells as a dual approach for landfill leachate treatment and power production: a review.利用微生物燃料电池作为处理垃圾渗滤液和发电的双重方法:综述。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jun;31(29):41683-41733. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30841-w. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
5
Prevalence and Source Tracing of PFAS in Shallow Groundwater Used for Drinking Water in Wisconsin, USA.美国威斯康星州浅层地下水用作饮用水的全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的流行程度和来源追踪。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Nov 14;57(45):17415-17426. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c02826. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
6
Assessing the Fate of Dissolved Organic Compounds in Landfill Leachate and Wastewater Treatment Systems.评估垃圾渗滤液和废水处理系统中溶解性有机化合物的归宿
ACS ES T Water. 2022 Dec 9;2(12):2502-2509. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.2c00320. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
7
A Recent Progress in the Leachate Pretreatment Methods Coupled with Anaerobic Digestion for Enhanced Biogas Production: Feasibility, Trends, and Techno-Economic Evaluation.渗滤液预处理方法与厌氧消化耦合强化沼气生产的最新进展:可行性、趋势和技术经济评价。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 1;24(1):763. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010763.
8
Global distributions, source-type dependencies, and concentration ranges of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in groundwater.地下水中超/全氟烷基物质的全球分布、来源类型依赖性和浓度范围。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 1;841:156602. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156602. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
9
Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in the Canadian Freshwater Environment.加拿大淡水环境中的全氟烷基物质 (PFASs)。
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2022 May;82(4):581-591. doi: 10.1007/s00244-022-00922-x. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
10
Non-persistent exposures from plasticizers or plastic constituents in remote Arctic communities: a case for further research.偏远北极社区中增塑剂或塑料成分的非持续性暴露:进一步研究的案例。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2022 May;32(3):400-407. doi: 10.1038/s41370-022-00425-w. Epub 2022 Mar 28.