Zeng Xueyun, Sui Mingjie, Liu Rui, Qian Xinyu, Li Wenfeng, Zheng Erwei, Yang Jinjin, Li Jinmei, Huang Weidong, Yang Hongbin, Yu Hongjuan, Luo Nan
School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
National University Singapore Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, 117549, Singapore.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Feb 27;19(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01711-1.
This study aimed to assess the health utility of leukemia patients in China using the EQ-5D-5L, compare it with the population norms, and identify the potential factors associated with health utility.
A hospital based cross-sectional survey was conducted in three tertiary hospitals from July 2015 to February 2016. A total of 186 patients with leukemia completed the EQ-5D-5L and their health utility scores were calculated using the Chinese value set. EQ-5D-5L utility and dimensions scores of leukemia patients were compared with China's population norms using Kruskal-Wallis test and chi square test. Potential factors associated with health utility were identified using Tobit regression.
The mean EQ-5D-5L utility scores of patients with leukemia, grouped by either gender or age, were significantly lower than those of the general population (p < 0.001). The same results were found for individual dimensions of EQ-5D-5L, where leukemia patients reported more health problems than the general population (p < 0.001). The utility score of leukemia patients was found to be significantly related to medical insurance, religious belief, comorbidities, social support and ECOG performance status.
This study indicated that leukemia patients have worse health status compared to the general population of China and that multiple factors affect the health utility of the patients. The utility scores reported in this study could be useful in future cost-utility analysis.
本研究旨在使用EQ-5D-5L评估中国白血病患者的健康效用,将其与总体规范进行比较,并确定与健康效用相关的潜在因素。
2015年7月至2016年2月在三家三级医院进行了一项基于医院的横断面调查。共有186例白血病患者完成了EQ-5D-5L,并使用中国价值集计算了他们的健康效用得分。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和卡方检验将白血病患者的EQ-5D-5L效用和维度得分与中国总体规范进行比较。使用Tobit回归确定与健康效用相关的潜在因素。
按性别或年龄分组的白血病患者的平均EQ-5D-5L效用得分显著低于普通人群(p<0.001)。EQ-5D-5L的各个维度也得到了相同的结果,白血病患者报告的健康问题比普通人群更多(p<0.001)。发现白血病患者的效用得分与医疗保险、宗教信仰、合并症、社会支持和ECOG表现状态显著相关。
本研究表明,与中国普通人群相比,白血病患者的健康状况更差,并且多种因素影响患者的健康效用。本研究报告的效用得分可能对未来的成本-效用分析有用。