Sander Uwe, Biedermann Irina, Emmert Martin, Haaf Hans-Günter, Hofmann Anna-Lena, Hopf Felix, Kiss Susann, Parthier Katrin, Schindler Anja, Patzelt Christiane
Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Apr;161:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.12.007. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
Feedback from patients about aspects of rehabilitation services is increasingly provided online, for example, on specialized hospital comparison websites. Therefore, we examined which kind of online statements from rehabilitation patients published on the leading hospital comparison website "Klinikbewertungen.de" (KB) is associated with a positive recommendation of a rehabilitation clinic and which negative aspects are associated with a non-recommendation.
For eight indication groups stratified online statements of rehabilitants at KB were evaluated qualitatively using content analysis. The relationship between positive (negative) statements and the (non-) recommendation was examined.
Content analysis of 911 experience reports revealed 20 categories. Most often, it was the "rehabilitation success" perceived by rehabilitation patients that was significantly associated with a recommendation or a non-recommendation of a hospital, and in five quality assurance (QA) comparison groups the category "catering" was associated with a positive or negative recommendation. In all QS comparison groups, there was an association with at least one of the following process-oriented rehabilitation categories: "rehabilitation measures", "rehabilitation plan and rehabilitation goals" and / or "diagnosis to discharge".
Patient experiences with the perceived "rehabilitation success" and with the central processes of rehabilitation are particularly important for the recommendation or non-recommendation of a hospital for patients in all eight indication groups. On the basis of these results, rehabilitation hospitals can specifically identify the aspects of care that are important when patients recommend a hospital for rehabilitation. Online narratives of patients provide additional insights into the reasons for patients' satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their rehabilitation. These narratives are available to potential rehabilitation patients as a low-threshold source of information and decision-making aid.
患者越来越多地在网上提供有关康复服务各方面的反馈,例如在专门的医院比较网站上。因此,我们研究了在领先的医院比较网站“Klinikbewertungen.de”(KB)上发布的康复患者的哪种在线陈述与康复诊所的积极推荐相关,以及哪些负面方面与不推荐相关。
对八个适应症组在KB上康复者的分层在线陈述进行定性内容分析评估。研究了积极(消极)陈述与(不)推荐之间的关系。
对911份经验报告的内容分析揭示了20个类别。最常见的是,康复患者所感知到的“康复成功”与医院的推荐或不推荐显著相关,并且在五个质量保证(QA)比较组中,“餐饮”类别与积极或消极推荐相关。在所有QS比较组中,与以下至少一个以过程为导向的康复类别存在关联:“康复措施”、“康复计划和康复目标”以及/或者“从诊断到出院”。
患者对所感知到的“康复成功”以及康复核心过程的体验对于所有八个适应症组患者对医院的推荐或不推荐尤为重要。基于这些结果,康复医院可以具体确定患者推荐医院进行康复时重要的护理方面。患者的在线叙述为患者对康复满意或不满意的原因提供了额外的见解。这些叙述作为一种低门槛的信息来源和决策辅助工具可供潜在的康复患者使用。