Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭患者的心房颤动负荷与临床结局:CASTLE-AF试验

Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure: The CASTLE-AF Trial.

作者信息

Brachmann Johannes, Sohns Christian, Andresen Dietrich, Siebels Jürgen, Sehner Susanne, Boersma Luca, Merkely Béla, Pokushalov Evgeny, Sanders Prashanthan, Schunkert Heribert, Bänsch Dietmar, Dagher Lilas, Zhao Yan, Mahnkopf Christian, Wegscheider Karl, Marrouche Nassir F

机构信息

Department of Cardiology Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany.

Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.

出版信息

JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 May;7(5):594-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.11.021. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This subanalysis of the CASTLE-AF (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF) trial aimed to address the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, AF burden, and hard clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with AF.

BACKGROUND

The CASTLE-AF trial demonstrated the benefit of CA compared to pharmacological treatment in decreasing mortality and CV hospitalizations in patients with AF and HFrEF. However, the impact of AF recurrence and AF burden after ablation on long-term treatment benefit remains unknown.

METHODS

The CASTLE-AF protocol randomized 363 patients with coexisting HF and AF in a multicenter prospective controlled fashion to catheter ablation (n = 179) versus pharmacological therapy (n = 184). Two hundred eighty patients were included in this subanalysis (as-treated), 128 of them underwent ablation and 152 received pharmacological treatment. All patients had implanted dual chamber or biventricular implantable defibrillators with activated home monitoring capabilities. The individual AF burden was calculated as the percentage of the atrial arrhythmia time per day.

RESULTS

AF burden at baseline was not predictive of the primary endpoint (p = 0.473) or all-cause mortality (p = 0.446). AF recurrence (defined as any episode >30 s) did not show any relationship with the primary endpoints of mortality and occurrence of HF, irrespective of the treatment arm. An AF burden below 50% after 6 months of catheter ablation, was associated with a significant decrease in primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15 to 0.71; p = 0.014) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.71; p = 0.031). The risk of the primary endpoint or mortality was directly related to a low (<50%) or high (≥50%) AF burden at 6 months post-ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

AF burden at 6 months was predictive of hard clinical outcomes in HF patients with AF. The first recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia episode >30 s after ablation was not associated with improvement in mortality and hospitalization for HF. (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF [CASTLE-AF]; NCT00643188).

摘要

目的

本对CASTLE-AF(左心室功能不全合并房颤患者的导管消融与标准传统治疗)试验的亚分析旨在探讨房颤复发、房颤负荷与心力衰竭(HF)合并房颤患者的严重临床结局之间的关联。

背景

CASTLE-AF试验表明,与药物治疗相比,导管消融在降低房颤合并射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的死亡率和心血管住院率方面具有益处。然而,消融后房颤复发和房颤负荷对长期治疗益处的影响仍不清楚。

方法

CASTLE-AF试验以多中心前瞻性对照方式将363例合并HF和房颤的患者随机分为导管消融组(n = 179)和药物治疗组(n = 184)。本亚分析纳入了280例患者(按实际治疗情况),其中128例接受了消融,152例接受了药物治疗。所有患者均植入了具有激活家庭监测功能的双腔或双心室植入式除颤器。个体房颤负荷计算为每日房性心律失常时间的百分比。

结果

基线时的房颤负荷不能预测主要终点(p = 0.473)或全因死亡率(p = 0.446)。房颤复发(定义为任何持续时间>30秒的发作)与死亡率和HF发生的主要终点均无任何关系,无论治疗组如何。导管消融6个月后房颤负荷低于50%,与主要复合结局显著降低相关(风险比[HR]:0.33;95%置信区间[CI]:0.15至0.71;p = 0.014)及全因死亡率降低相关(HR:0.23;95%CI:0.07至0.71;p = 0.031)。主要终点或死亡率的风险与消融后6个月时低(<50%)或高(≥50%)房颤负荷直接相关。

结论

6个月时的房颤负荷可预测HF合并房颤患者的严重临床结局。消融后首次复发的房性快速性心律失常发作>30秒与死亡率改善及HF住院无关。(左心室功能不全合并房颤患者的导管消融与标准传统治疗[CASTLE-AF];NCT00643188)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验