Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Chest. 2021 Jun;159(6):2191-2204. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.057. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
Since COVID-19 was identified, its clinical and biological heterogeneity has been recognized. Identifying COVID-19 phenotypes might help guide basic, clinical, and translational research efforts.
Does the clinical spectrum of patients with COVID-19 contain distinct phenotypes and subphenotypes?
We included adult patients (≥ 18 years) positive for laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from a prospective COVID-19 registry database in the Cleveland Clinic Health System in Ohio and Florida. The patients were split into training and testing sets. Using latent class analysis (LCA), we first identified phenotypic clusters of patients with COVID-19 based on demographics, comorbidities, and presenting symptoms. We then identified subphenotypes of hospitalized patients with additional blood biomarker data measured on hospital admission. The associations of phenotypes/subphenotypes and clinical outcomes were investigated. Multivariable prediction models were established to predict assignment to the LCA-defined phenotypes and subphenotypes and then evaluated on an independent testing set.
We analyzed data for 20,572 patients. Seven phenotypes were identified on the basis of different profiles of presenting COVID-19 symptoms and existing comorbidities, including the following groups: young, no symptoms; young, symptoms; middle-aged, no symptoms; middle-aged, symptoms; middle-aged, comorbidities; old, no symptoms; and old, symptoms. The rates of inpatient hospitalization for the phenotypes were significantly different (P < .001). Five subphenotypes were identified for the subgroup of hospitalized patients, including the following subgroups: young, elevated WBC and platelet counts; middle-aged, lymphopenic with elevated C-reactive protein; middle-aged, hyperinflammatory; old, leukopenic with comorbidities; and old, hyperinflammatory with kidney dysfunction. The hospital mortality and the times from hospitalization to ICU transfer or death were significantly different (P < .001). The models for predicting the LCA-defined phenotypes and subphenotypes showed high discrimination (concordance index, 0.92 and 0.91).
Hypothesis-free LCA-defined phenotypes and subphenotypes of patients with COVID-19 can be identified. These may help clinical investigators conduct stratified analyses in clinical trials and assist basic science researchers in characterizing the pathobiology of the spectrum of COVID-19 presentations.
自 COVID-19 被发现以来,其临床表现和生物学异质性已得到认可。确定 COVID-19 的表型特征可能有助于指导基础、临床和转化研究工作。
COVID-19 患者的临床表现是否存在不同的表型和亚型?
我们纳入了来自俄亥俄州克利夫兰诊所健康系统和佛罗里达州前瞻性 COVID-19 注册数据库的成年患者(≥18 岁),这些患者的实验室检测结果均为 SARS-CoV-2 感染阳性。患者被分为训练集和测试集。我们首先使用潜在类别分析(LCA),根据患者的人口统计学、合并症和首发症状,确定 COVID-19 患者的表型聚类。然后,我们根据入院时测量的额外血液生物标志物数据,确定住院患者的亚表型。我们研究了表型/亚表型与临床结局的相关性。我们建立了多变量预测模型,以预测患者在 LCA 定义的表型中的分配情况,并在独立的测试集中进行了评估。
我们分析了 20572 名患者的数据。根据不同的 COVID-19 首发症状和合并症,确定了 7 种表型,包括以下组:年轻、无症状;年轻、有症状;中年、无症状;中年、有症状;中年、合并症;年老、无症状;年老、有症状。各表型的住院率差异有统计学意义(P<.001)。对于住院患者亚组,确定了 5 种亚表型,包括以下亚组:年轻、白细胞和血小板计数升高;中年、淋巴细胞减少、C 反应蛋白升高;中年、炎症反应活跃;年老、合并症、白细胞减少;年老、炎症反应活跃、肾功能障碍。住院死亡率和从住院到转入 ICU 或死亡的时间差异有统计学意义(P<.001)。用于预测 LCA 定义的表型和亚表型的模型具有较高的区分度(一致性指数为 0.92 和 0.91)。
可以确定 COVID-19 患者的无假设 LCA 定义表型和亚表型。这可能有助于临床研究者在临床试验中进行分层分析,并帮助基础科学研究人员描述 COVID-19 各种表现的病理生物学特征。