Department of Pharmacy, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021 Apr;9(2):e00725. doi: 10.1002/prp2.725.
Acute phase hyperglycemia and exaggerated glucose fluctuation may be associated with poor outcomes in diabetic patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to determine whether intervention by clinical pharmacists can mitigate blood glucose and glucose fluctuations in these fragile patients. This retrospective study enrolled patients with diabetes and AMI, from 1 January 2019 to 30 June 2020 in our institution. Blood glucose and glucose fluctuations were calculated before and after the pharmacist's intervention and between patients who underwent intervention and those who did not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the impact of patient characteristics on the results. A total of 170 patients were included in our primary analysis, including 29 patients who received the pharmacist intervention and 141 patients who did not. After the pharmacist's intervention, blood glucose (fasting blood glucose-FBG, from 11.9 to 9.8; postprandial blood glucose-PBG, from 15.3 to 13.2; mean blood glucose-BG, 14.5 to 12.3 mmol/L; p < .001), and glucose fluctuations (standard deviation of blood glucose-SDBG, from 3.8 to 3.0, mmol/L, p = .005) were significantly improved. Before PSM, no clear effects were found in intervention versus nonintervention patients, in terms of blood glucose and glucose fluctuation indicators, except for FBG (9.3 vs. 8.0. mmol/L, p = .005). Further analysis indicated a high incidence of FBG <7.8 mmol/L in nonintervention versus intervention patients (51.5% vs. 27.6%, p = .003). After PSM, a significant reduction in blood glucose fluctuation (SDBG, 3.0 vs. 4.1, p = .031; PBGE, 2.1 vs. 4.1, p = .017; LAGE, 4.7 vs. 7.2, mmol/L, p = .004), and PBG (11.1 vs. 13.0, mmol/L, p = .048) was observed in the intervention group than in the nonintervention group. The clinical pharmacist intervention contributed to improved outcomes, specifically, in reducing blood glucose fluctuations and potential hypoglycemia risk.
急性相高血糖和血糖波动加剧可能与急性心肌梗死后糖尿病患者的不良预后相关。本研究旨在确定临床药师的干预是否可以减轻这些脆弱患者的血糖和血糖波动。这项回顾性研究纳入了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 6 月 30 日在我院就诊的糖尿病合并急性心肌梗死患者。在药师干预前后和干预组与未干预组之间计算血糖和血糖波动。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来降低患者特征对结果的影响。我们的主要分析共纳入 170 例患者,其中 29 例接受了药师干预,141 例未接受干预。在药师干预后,血糖(空腹血糖-FBG,从 11.9 降至 9.8mmol/L;餐后血糖-PBG,从 15.3 降至 13.2mmol/L;平均血糖-BG,从 14.5 降至 12.3mmol/L;p<0.001)和血糖波动(血糖标准差-SDBG,从 3.8 降至 3.0mmol/L,p=0.005)均显著改善。在 PSM 之前,干预组与非干预组在血糖和血糖波动指标方面,除了 FBG(9.3 与 8.0mmol/L,p=0.005)外,没有明显的效果。进一步分析表明,非干预组患者的 FBG<7.8mmol/L 发生率明显高于干预组(51.5%与 27.6%,p=0.003)。PSM 后,干预组的血糖波动(SDBG,3.0 与 4.1mmol/L,p=0.031;PBGE,2.1 与 4.1mmol/L,p=0.017;LAGE,4.7 与 7.2mmol/L,p=0.004)和 PBG(11.1 与 13.0mmol/L,p=0.048)显著降低。临床药师干预有助于改善结局,特别是降低血糖波动和潜在的低血糖风险。