Pitathawatchai Pittayapon, Chaichulee Sitthichok, Kirtsreesakul Virat
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.
Int J Audiol. 2022 Jan;61(1):66-77. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1884909. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
To assess the accuracy and reliability of a machine learning (ML) algorithm for predicting the full audiograms of hearing-impaired children relative to the common approach (CA).
Retrospective study.
There were 206 audiograms included from 206 children with sensorineural hearing loss. Nested cross-validation was used for evaluating the performance of the CA and ML. Six audiogram prediction simulations were performed in which either one or two thresholds across 0.5-4 kHz from complete audiograms in the dataset were labelled. Missing thresholds at the remaining frequencies were then predicted using the CA and ML in each simulation. The accuracy of the ML algorithm was determined by comparing the median average absolute threshold differences between the CA and ML using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The reliability between runs of the ML was also assessed with Cronbach's alphas.
The median average absolute threshold differences in ML (5-8 dBHL) were statistically significantly lower than those in CA (6.25-10 dBHL) in all six simulations ( value < 0.05). The ML algorithm was also found to be reliable to predict the audiograms in all six simulations ( > 0.9).
Using the ML to predict the children's audiograms was reliable and more accurate than using the CA.
评估一种机器学习(ML)算法相对于传统方法(CA)预测听力受损儿童完整听力图的准确性和可靠性。
回顾性研究。
纳入了206名感音神经性听力损失儿童的206份听力图。采用嵌套交叉验证来评估CA和ML的性能。进行了六次听力图预测模拟,在数据集中完整听力图的0.5 - 4kHz范围内标记一个或两个阈值。然后在每次模拟中使用CA和ML预测其余频率处缺失的阈值。通过使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较CA和ML之间的中位数平均绝对阈值差异来确定ML算法的准确性。还使用Cronbach's alphas评估了ML各次运行之间的可靠性。
在所有六次模拟中,ML的中位数平均绝对阈值差异(5 - 8 dBHL)在统计学上显著低于CA(6.25 - 10 dBHL)( 值<0.05)。还发现ML算法在所有六次模拟中预测听力图都是可靠的(>0.9)。
使用ML预测儿童听力图比使用CA更可靠、更准确。