Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Value Health. 2021 Mar;24(3):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.021. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
While the United States does not have a method for assessing the added therapeutic benefit of drugs, France, Canada, and Germany do. We examined the added therapeutic benefit of the most expensive drugs prescribed to Medicare Part D beneficiaries in the United States.
We identified ultra-expensive drugs with annual Medicare spending that exceeded $62 794 (United States GDP per capita in 2018) using Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Spending and Utilization Data. We used added therapeutic benefit ratings assessed by health technology assessment agencies in France, Canada, and Germany.
We identified 122 ultra-expensive drugs in 2018. Sixty-five percent of these drugs (n = 79) were assessed by at least one of the countries. Based on these assessments, approximately 75% received a low added therapeutic benefit rating.
Most ultra-expensive drugs prescribed in the United States and assessed by France, Canada, and Germany provide low added therapeutic benefit. Policy reforms in the United States could use added therapeutic benefit to inform coverage and pricing decisions for ultra-expensive drugs. Similar to Germany, one approach would be to allow the company to set a market price for a limited period of time before requiring a price reduction if the added therapeutic benefit is below a certain threshold. Another approach would be to identify when drug prices are substantially more expensive in the United States and conduct an added therapeutic benefit assessment and price review on these drugs.
美国没有评估药物附加治疗效益的方法,而法国、加拿大和德国有。我们考察了美国医疗保险处方药受益人群中开出的最昂贵药物的附加治疗效益。
我们使用医疗保险处方药支出和利用数据,确定了年医疗保险支出超过 62794 美元(2018 年美国人均国内生产总值)的超昂贵药物。我们使用法国、加拿大和德国的卫生技术评估机构评估的附加治疗效益评级。
我们在 2018 年确定了 122 种超昂贵药物。其中 65%(n=79)至少被其中一个国家评估。根据这些评估,约 75%的药物获得了低附加治疗效益评级。
在美国开出的、且被法国、加拿大和德国评估的大多数超昂贵药物提供的附加治疗效益较低。美国的政策改革可以利用附加治疗效益来为超昂贵药物的覆盖范围和定价决策提供信息。与德国类似,一种方法是允许公司在设定的时间段内设定市场价格,如果附加治疗效益低于一定阈值,则要求降价。另一种方法是确定美国的药品价格大幅高于其他国家的情况,并对这些药物进行附加治疗效益评估和价格审查。