Suppr超能文献

不同关节内药物治疗颞下颌关节骨关节炎的疗效是否存在差异?一项随机对照试验的系统评价。

Is there a difference in treatment effect of different intra-articular drugs for temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Sep;50(9):1233-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.019. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

Abstract

A systematic review based on the PRISMA guidelines was conducted to investigate and compare treatment with hyaluronic acid (HA), corticosteroids, and blood products in patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA). The MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles published until September 25, 2019. Articles met the inclusion criteria if they reported patients with TMJOA, a comparison group, and a follow-up period of at least 6 months. The mean and standard deviation for TMJ pain and maximum mouth opening (MMO) were reported. Nine studies involving 443 patients were included. Injectables and Ringer's lactate solution or normal saline were reported to significantly improve TMJ pain and MMO. Regarding TMJ pain, two studies showed a significant superiority of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF)/platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections with or without arthrocentesis over HA, but HA showed a significant improvement compared to corticosteroids. For MMO, no injectable was found to be superior to Ringer's lactate or a normal saline control, but arthrocentesis + PRP resulted in MMO improvement compared to arthrocentesis + HA. Overall, all injectables in conjunction with arthrocentesis were efficient in alleviating pain and improving MMO in TMJOA patients; however, a meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity across studies.

摘要

一项基于 PRISMA 指南的系统评价调查并比较了透明质酸 (HA)、皮质类固醇和血液制品治疗颞下颌关节骨关节炎 (TMJOA) 的效果。检索了 MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,以获取截至 2019 年 9 月 25 日发表的文章。如果文章报告了 TMJOA 患者、对照组和至少 6 个月的随访期,则符合纳入标准。报告了 TMJ 疼痛和最大张口度 (MMO) 的平均值和标准差。纳入了 9 项涉及 443 名患者的研究。注射剂和林格氏乳酸溶液或生理盐水被报道能显著改善 TMJ 疼痛和 MMO。关于 TMJ 疼痛,两项研究显示富含生长因子的血浆 (PRGF)/富血小板血浆 (PRP) 注射联合或不联合关节穿刺术在缓解疼痛方面明显优于 HA,但与皮质类固醇相比,HA 显示出显著改善。对于 MMO,没有发现任何一种注射剂优于林格氏乳酸或生理盐水对照剂,但关节穿刺术+PRP 与关节穿刺术+HA 相比,能改善 MMO。总的来说,所有联合关节穿刺术的注射剂在缓解 TMJOA 患者疼痛和改善 MMO 方面都很有效;然而,由于研究之间存在异质性,因此无法进行荟萃分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验